https://twitter.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1702141886578704719

One of the aspects of government input into coverage of issues that I find most noxious is that it was done surreptitiously. Done this way, it is tantamount to mind control… encouraging the citizenry to believe that the majority has a certain belief, when in fact it is merely that other beliefs are being suppressed by an “invisible hand”.

I have generally no problem with government use of the bully pulpit, although I know that Jackson and others seem to think it is insufficient to protect the public. Influence over the public discourse in this way seems to be a natural consequence of electoral success. But exercising control surreptitiously is another matter entirely. That strikes me as simply fraudulent.

I wish SCOTUS would ask the government why in their view influence over social media (etc.) must be hidden?! I cannot think of any truthfully logical reason besides “So we can exercise influence without you being aware of it!”

Someone should ask Associate Justice Jackson the same question!

It’s like an employee at McDonalds complaining that the counter limits the ability of the paying customers to flip hamburgers for the staff. Except the hamburgers are our natural rights and the counter is the Constitution.

Having zero military experience himself, he feels free to tell Israel’s combat hardened leadership how to conduct the war in Gaza.

It’s time for the IDF to annihilate Hamas.

—- compelling evidence that DEI hires for SCOTUS are a very bad idea.

Debunking Biden and companies’ bullshit.

Justice Jackson’s comments are very … disturbing.