“Nixon refused to consider contesting the election, feeling a lengthy controversy would diminish the United States in the eyes of the world and that the uncertainty would hurt U.S. interests.”

After a friend shared this article with me – please see link below – decided to do some research, and this is what I shared with him:

1) Nixon did not publicly challenge the theft, but his campaign did so privately and tried to prove the theft before the electoral votes were cast.

2) Agree with the author that it was a significant mistake by Nixon to not challenge the theft – PUBLICLY – but note the Dem/ Left/ MSM narrative is so prevailing that even this author is repeating it (i.e., …for good of country)

3) Some citizens refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of the abnormalities & questions – the same criteria used to question elections in other countries – as long someone they did not like, and his supporters, were harmed. They gave no consideration to the harm done to the country.

https://amgreatness.com/2021/04/09/blame-it-on-richard-nixon/

@ physicsguy 100% agree: “The focus of the Dems is complete control at the federal level. And they are almost there. Combine that with the blue states and the country is gone.” See history. However, I am not without hope.

@ miguel cervantes 100% agree: “they stole the election to destroy the country, and yet we pretend otherwise, ”

@ IrishOtter49 100% agree: “The Electoral College system is pure genius ” + “The history of the Roman Republic…”

@ huxley 100% agree: “I don’t see that many Dems pulling the R-lever, but enough could sit on their hands, disgusted with Biden and the Party, to make the difference.” I am not without hope.

@ Aggie 100% agree – especially this: “I don’t expect the 2020 result to ever be accurately characterized for posterity, and I don’t see enough changes to think that any election going forward isn’t going to be gamed to the absolute max.”

@ Abraxas Nice work: “closely aligned on immigration, trade, and foreign intervention” + “closely aligned on immigration, trade, and foreign intervention.” + “the “uniparty” label isn’t entirely wrong, though it can be taken too far.”