<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sowell on multiculturalism	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gringo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gringo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wendy Laubach
&lt;blockquote&gt;The other was the only class I was ever subjected to that was basically sensitivity training. The trainer was shocked to learn that several of us would level harsh criticism at a specimen of flabby, muddy writing even though the author was black. We felt it would be an intolerable insult to do otherwise.&lt;/blockquote&gt;My take on &lt;b&gt;1619&lt;/b&gt; is that if it were submitted as a college term paper in, in the days when grades had to be earned and if the grader were unaware of her race,  Hannah-Jones would have gotten a C+ to B- for &lt;b&gt;1619&lt;/b&gt;. I was going to say, &quot;how can the NYT let such sloppy writing get into print?&quot; but  I have seen other disasters published in the NYT.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy Laubach</p>
<blockquote><p>The other was the only class I was ever subjected to that was basically sensitivity training. The trainer was shocked to learn that several of us would level harsh criticism at a specimen of flabby, muddy writing even though the author was black. We felt it would be an intolerable insult to do otherwise.</p></blockquote>
<p>My take on <b>1619</b> is that if it were submitted as a college term paper in, in the days when grades had to be earned and if the grader were unaware of her race,  Hannah-Jones would have gotten a C+ to B- for <b>1619</b>. I was going to say, &#8220;how can the NYT let such sloppy writing get into print?&#8221; but  I have seen other disasters published in the NYT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wendy Laubach		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendy Laubach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having retired in 1999, I mostly missed diversity re-education.  I can remember barking my shins on the general topic twice and feeling alarm.  One was when a senior colleague took offense at my skepticism about affirmative action.  It seemed like a great idea to be careful in interviewing candidates not to make the mistake of overestimating the abilities of someone who simply &quot;looked like us.&quot;  I tried to be careful to hunt for the true qualities of success rather than what would make someone&#039;s company or conversation comfortably familiar because of shared interests in non-professional areas.  It&#039;s also good to expand the search pool to include sources we might have overlooked.  But the idea that we&#039;d hire someone who clearly lacked the necessary horsepower because he or she was a member of a targeted racial group struck me as suicidal for the firm and unfair to the hiree.

The other was the only class I was ever subjected to that was basically sensitivity training. The trainer was shocked to learn that several of us would level harsh criticism at a specimen of flabby, muddy writing even though the author was black.  We felt it would be an intolerable insult to do otherwise.  What should the message be, this is gobbledegook, but we&#039;re not going to say so because it&#039;s the best we could expect from someone who belongs to a societal splinter we expect not to measure up?  You don&#039;t deserve to be judged by the same standards we apply to our august selves?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having retired in 1999, I mostly missed diversity re-education.  I can remember barking my shins on the general topic twice and feeling alarm.  One was when a senior colleague took offense at my skepticism about affirmative action.  It seemed like a great idea to be careful in interviewing candidates not to make the mistake of overestimating the abilities of someone who simply &#8220;looked like us.&#8221;  I tried to be careful to hunt for the true qualities of success rather than what would make someone&#8217;s company or conversation comfortably familiar because of shared interests in non-professional areas.  It&#8217;s also good to expand the search pool to include sources we might have overlooked.  But the idea that we&#8217;d hire someone who clearly lacked the necessary horsepower because he or she was a member of a targeted racial group struck me as suicidal for the firm and unfair to the hiree.</p>
<p>The other was the only class I was ever subjected to that was basically sensitivity training. The trainer was shocked to learn that several of us would level harsh criticism at a specimen of flabby, muddy writing even though the author was black.  We felt it would be an intolerable insult to do otherwise.  What should the message be, this is gobbledegook, but we&#8217;re not going to say so because it&#8217;s the best we could expect from someone who belongs to a societal splinter we expect not to measure up?  You don&#8217;t deserve to be judged by the same standards we apply to our august selves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Martin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Me: “Kids, don’t go out (in the winter) with a wet head. Let your hair dry first.”

Children: (eye roll).

Another tactic. Not communist though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: “Kids, don’t go out (in the winter) with a wet head. Let your hair dry first.”</p>
<p>Children: (eye roll).</p>
<p>Another tactic. Not communist though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 16:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;It’s a long-used tactic by the Communist International &lt;/i&gt;

[eyeroll]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s a long-used tactic by the Communist International </i></p>
<p>[eyeroll]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suspect that compared with most national politicians, Quayle was not that bright. An opinion journalist who met him described him as the sort of person who repeats the punchlines of jokes in less subtle terms.  He didn&#039;t last long as a working lawyer; after a couple of years he was assigned to a position in the family newspaper business.   He was a bad fit for an executive position where he would be the principal decision-maker, so not the optimal choice for the position as VP.  It&#039;s a stupid 5th wheel job which ought to be abolished, of course.  Since the person who holds it has a 25% chance of succeeding to the presidency, you should stick someone in the position who is familiar with the work of an executive.  Per Fred Barnes, George Bush the Elder picked someone consequent to his being touted by a couple of his aides.  George Bush the Elder had his virtues, but his decision-making was not error free.

Quayle wasn&#039;t an idiot, though.  Idiots do not pass the Indiana bar exam on their first attempt. (John Kennedy Jr required three attempts to pass the New York bar exam).  He didn&#039;t have any obtrusive character defects.  So, the media set about a full-court information op to denigrate him which extended to attacks on his wife.  If our appellate courts hadn&#039;t granted a warm little gift to the media by gutting defamation law, some outlets would have been liable.  The articles about his military service record were repulsive as were the &lt;i&gt;Doonesbury&lt;/i&gt; cartoons retailing the fictions of one Brett Kimberlein.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that compared with most national politicians, Quayle was not that bright. An opinion journalist who met him described him as the sort of person who repeats the punchlines of jokes in less subtle terms.  He didn&#8217;t last long as a working lawyer; after a couple of years he was assigned to a position in the family newspaper business.   He was a bad fit for an executive position where he would be the principal decision-maker, so not the optimal choice for the position as VP.  It&#8217;s a stupid 5th wheel job which ought to be abolished, of course.  Since the person who holds it has a 25% chance of succeeding to the presidency, you should stick someone in the position who is familiar with the work of an executive.  Per Fred Barnes, George Bush the Elder picked someone consequent to his being touted by a couple of his aides.  George Bush the Elder had his virtues, but his decision-making was not error free.</p>
<p>Quayle wasn&#8217;t an idiot, though.  Idiots do not pass the Indiana bar exam on their first attempt. (John Kennedy Jr required three attempts to pass the New York bar exam).  He didn&#8217;t have any obtrusive character defects.  So, the media set about a full-court information op to denigrate him which extended to attacks on his wife.  If our appellate courts hadn&#8217;t granted a warm little gift to the media by gutting defamation law, some outlets would have been liable.  The articles about his military service record were repulsive as were the <i>Doonesbury</i> cartoons retailing the fictions of one Brett Kimberlein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The greatest scandal about the Dan Quayle episode was that the school had been supplied with and didn&#039;t notice a flashcard that misspelled potato.  Either that or they left off the last letter of potatoes.  Trying to bring this up at the time elicited blank stares or &quot;Well maybe, but...&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest scandal about the Dan Quayle episode was that the school had been supplied with and didn&#8217;t notice a flashcard that misspelled potato.  Either that or they left off the last letter of potatoes.  Trying to bring this up at the time elicited blank stares or &#8220;Well maybe, but&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steph		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert Hughes (art critic, liberal, author of Shock of the New) also wrote a critique of multiculturalism, &quot;Culture of Complaint - The Fraying of America&quot; published in 1993, and is still relevant today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Hughes (art critic, liberal, author of Shock of the New) also wrote a critique of multiculturalism, &#8220;Culture of Complaint &#8211; The Fraying of America&#8221; published in 1993, and is still relevant today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Thats why lyou have all the courses in basket weaving, pottery, journalism, and teacher education. (couldn’t resist taking a dig at teachers)&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re not going to find courses in basket weaving outside of odd redoubts like the School of American Crafts at RIT. J-schools and teachers colleges may be sinkholes of studpidity; the former have been around for three generations and the latter for five generations.  

Again, what you&#039;re not noticing is that a far larger segment of the young adult population is traipsing through these institutions than was the case 50 years ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Thats why lyou have all the courses in basket weaving, pottery, journalism, and teacher education. (couldn’t resist taking a dig at teachers)</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re not going to find courses in basket weaving outside of odd redoubts like the School of American Crafts at RIT. J-schools and teachers colleges may be sinkholes of studpidity; the former have been around for three generations and the latter for five generations.  </p>
<p>Again, what you&#8217;re not noticing is that a far larger segment of the young adult population is traipsing through these institutions than was the case 50 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Martin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s a long-used tactic by the Communist International (the first Globalist organization) to divide and undermine societies around the world to set the stage for revolution of the proletariat. It’s old news, rebranded, by a multi-headed movement that they and their fellow travelers never gave up. It wasn’t a Russian movement… it started in England in the late 19th century but the first place it ever succeeded was in Russia, post-WWI in 1919. The Soviets became its protector and chief sponsor … it consumed more than the Soviet military budget prior to WWII. The point is all these tactics (DEI,DSG,BLM,Antifa, ungendering, Alinsky’s rules, etc) are from a playbook that has been in use since the ‘20’s. It’s being used now with more success as the collapse of the original place the revolution succeeded recedes in history, beyond the keen of the young and uneducated (and I’m speaking here of Ivy League grads too). We get our dander up and confront each tactic one-by-one without facing the reality of the movement. The fellow travelers just shift to the next tactic, knowing they can rebrand and come back to the one just abandoned eventually. You can fool some of the people all of the time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a long-used tactic by the Communist International (the first Globalist organization) to divide and undermine societies around the world to set the stage for revolution of the proletariat. It’s old news, rebranded, by a multi-headed movement that they and their fellow travelers never gave up. It wasn’t a Russian movement… it started in England in the late 19th century but the first place it ever succeeded was in Russia, post-WWI in 1919. The Soviets became its protector and chief sponsor … it consumed more than the Soviet military budget prior to WWII. The point is all these tactics (DEI,DSG,BLM,Antifa, ungendering, Alinsky’s rules, etc) are from a playbook that has been in use since the ‘20’s. It’s being used now with more success as the collapse of the original place the revolution succeeded recedes in history, beyond the keen of the young and uneducated (and I’m speaking here of Ivy League grads too). We get our dander up and confront each tactic one-by-one without facing the reality of the movement. The fellow travelers just shift to the next tactic, knowing they can rebrand and come back to the one just abandoned eventually. You can fool some of the people all of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2023/02/14/sowell-on-multiculturalism/#comment-2666753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=124140#comment-2666753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good summary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
