Which is exactly what the liberals in congress are charging mr. Trump with.
And which the leftists in DOJ will no doubt use to indict him when so charged by congress, in fact probably have been preparing to do for the last several years.
They’re just waiting for the right moment, and what better date than 6 January 2023, on the anniversary of the supposed insurrection, to arrest mr. Trump and drag him off to prison for a speedy trial and conviction.

Bingo. Nothing less will suffice. Highly unlikely to happen however, so the corruption persists.

VivaFrei talked about it this am. I haven’t been able to find a pdf of the judge’s order allowing two of her claims to go forward but dismissing the other eight.

SCOTUS had no available legal remedy for the election fraud problem. That is why I have hammered home the message that prevention is the only way.

My opinion is that, if the Constitution is the guide, it doesn’t matter if the executive branch is in cahoots with the action. It would still be prohibited.

If I do understand his argument correctly, the Legislative branch of government has no business—no right—to “invade the space” of the Executive branch, i.e., to do what ONLY the Executive branch is allowed—by the Constitution—to do.

Leaving aside the pitifully dismissive regard that the current administration has for the Constitution, WHAT IF the Executive branch (IOW the all-encompassing “Biden”) is absolutely FINE with the “Biden”-controlled Legislative branch’s effort to draw and quarter Trump?
(“FINE” as in, “Make OUR day; CRUCIFY the bas***d!!”)

IOW, would such a “separation of powers” be a non-sequitur given that the Legislative branch is doing PRECISELY WHAT the Executive branch would like to do; i.e., PRECISELY WHAT the Executive branch wants the Legislative branch to do.

So I guess the question is, Would such a bizarre, corrupt situation STILL prevent—according to the Constitution—the Legislative branch from persecuting Trump?

“Musk Asks Schiff If He Approved ‘State Censorship’; Advocates Modern ‘Church Commission’ To Investigate FBI Corruption”—
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/musk-asks-schiff-if-he-approved-state-censorship-advocates-modern-church-commission

The above (link) is a formidable posting, set up by a “wild and crazy guy”(TM) who just happens to be one of the richest individuals on the planet and has an extraordinarily whimsical sense of humor—oh, and who by buying Twitter now owns the keys to the realm of some ultra-sensitive information that he’s NOT SUPPOSED TO HAVE let alone PUBLICIZE.

In this posting the 1975 Church Commission, is discussed (including the suggestion that the Church-inspired laws need to be seriously updated for the 21st century) along with an extraordinary video of Frank Church—in 1975!!—explaining the need for the commission and the laws intended to limit the extent of snooping on American citizens.
https://twitter.com/TyCardon/status/1604913025651298305
This is MUST viewing.

All of Church’s efforts were blown out of the water as the result of 9/11 and its aftermath—where snooping power was returned, in spades, to the alphabet agencies to prevent future attacks (though one could well argue that as a result of a questionable interpretation of Church’s efforts, “walls” built up between FBI and CIA intelligence gathering greatly assisted in bin-Laden’s success).

This awesome power was then turned on American citizens—i.e., subverted by Obama and his gang leading to such outrages as the IRS scandal (much more of which we should be seeing in the near future—in its new, turbo-charged incarnation), Russiagate and everything in its aftermath.

IRONIC—or maybe that’s not quite the right word—that the snooping laws, expanded as a result of Osama bin-Laden’s insidious attack on America, have been manipulated and exploited even more insidiously by Obama and his henchmen to FINISH bin-Laden’s goal…of America’s destruction…or, if you prefer, “transformation”.

As they say in the Casbah, INSHALLAH.