<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:09:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian E		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 00:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I mentioned Barr to emphasize my point-- just because you can doesn&#039;t mean you should, using Hillary as the example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned Barr to emphasize my point&#8211; just because you can doesn&#8217;t mean you should, using Hillary as the example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[remember matt whitaker, he had a really acid skepticism about this whole travisham, recall what they did to him, they brought the ftc and the doj against him what they did to guiliani, who brought us much of this samizdat info,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remember matt whitaker, he had a really acid skepticism about this whole travisham, recall what they did to him, they brought the ftc and the doj against him what they did to guiliani, who brought us much of this samizdat info,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: avi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[avi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted,&quot;

He also felt that Lon Horuichi is one swell guy. Barr is a traitor like his father.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted,&#8221;</p>
<p>He also felt that Lon Horuichi is one swell guy. Barr is a traitor like his father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: avi		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[avi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised Garfinkle didnt pick another goose-stepping nazi like Robert Müller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised Garfinkle didnt pick another goose-stepping nazi like Robert Müller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 20:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted,&lt;/i&gt;

What does Bill Barr think about Jeffrey Epstein&#039;s fractured hyoid bone?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted,</i></p>
<p>What does Bill Barr think about Jeffrey Epstein&#8217;s fractured hyoid bone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kurt		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some of us are old enough to remember in late 2019 and early 2020 when the Democrats said that asking a foreign leader to investigate possible crimes committed by a potential political component was tantamount to illegal election interference and an impeachable offense.  So what does that make it when the Attorney General announces the appointment of a special prosecutor to examine an actual, declared political candidate?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of us are old enough to remember in late 2019 and early 2020 when the Democrats said that asking a foreign leader to investigate possible crimes committed by a potential political component was tantamount to illegal election interference and an impeachable offense.  So what does that make it when the Attorney General announces the appointment of a special prosecutor to examine an actual, declared political candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian E		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Well, Sundance may have jumped the shark. Time will tell.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; -om

Maybe. But given the fact that congressmen have already had their phones siezed by the fbi, it makes sense that any incoming MAGA representative will be treated to the Washington DC &quot;welcome wagon.&quot;

Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted, but just because they can, doesn&#039;t mean they should. Think Comey&#039;s assessment of Hillary&#039;s crime.

&lt;b&gt;&quot;A bombshell report released on Thursday reveals that former FBI Director James Comey’s memo on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said there was “evidence to support a conclusion” that she committed a felony before subordinates removed multiple references of incriminating terms and deleted mentions of evidence that supported felony and misdemeanor criminal acts.

The website of Senate Homeland and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) released the full draft of Comey’s memo on Clinton, including the edits to the draft. The Hill reports:

The full draft, with edits, leaves little doubt that Comey originally wrote on May 2, 2016 that there was evidence that Clinton and top aides may have violated both felony and misdemeanor statutes, though he did not believe he could prove intent before a jury.&quot;&lt;/b&gt;

I don&#039;t think they&#039;re going to focus on MAL, though. They already revealed that with leaked information to the Washington Post that there were no national secrets that Trump could profit on in the documents.

From what we know at this point, nothing being done to reject or seat alternate electors is a crime though.  

https://www.dailywire.com/news/comey-memo-bombshell-evidence-hillary-committed-ryan-saavedra]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Well, Sundance may have jumped the shark. Time will tell.&#8221;</i> -om</p>
<p>Maybe. But given the fact that congressmen have already had their phones siezed by the fbi, it makes sense that any incoming MAGA representative will be treated to the Washington DC &#8220;welcome wagon.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bill Barr thinks Trump will be legitimately indicted, but just because they can, doesn&#8217;t mean they should. Think Comey&#8217;s assessment of Hillary&#8217;s crime.</p>
<p><b>&#8220;A bombshell report released on Thursday reveals that former FBI Director James Comey’s memo on former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said there was “evidence to support a conclusion” that she committed a felony before subordinates removed multiple references of incriminating terms and deleted mentions of evidence that supported felony and misdemeanor criminal acts.</p>
<p>The website of Senate Homeland and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) released the full draft of Comey’s memo on Clinton, including the edits to the draft. The Hill reports:</p>
<p>The full draft, with edits, leaves little doubt that Comey originally wrote on May 2, 2016 that there was evidence that Clinton and top aides may have violated both felony and misdemeanor statutes, though he did not believe he could prove intent before a jury.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re going to focus on MAL, though. They already revealed that with leaked information to the Washington Post that there were no national secrets that Trump could profit on in the documents.</p>
<p>From what we know at this point, nothing being done to reject or seat alternate electors is a crime though.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/comey-memo-bombshell-evidence-hillary-committed-ryan-saavedra" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.dailywire.com/news/comey-memo-bombshell-evidence-hillary-committed-ryan-saavedra</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray SoCa		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654035</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray SoCa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 16:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654035</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Trumps Wrath for the gop that voted for his impeachment as demonstrated by the defeat, or decision not to run again in the midterms, I’m sure has had an impact…

I agree most congressional gop want him gone, but they can’t be too open about it. 

The abandonment of the Jan 6th useful idiots by the Gop speaks loudly, but they hoped to use it to get Trump and destroy Maga.

&lt;i&gt; That kind of depends on how much of the GOP leadership, and some of the Republicans in Congress, side with Biden instead of Trump.
Neither group wants him back.
&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trumps Wrath for the gop that voted for his impeachment as demonstrated by the defeat, or decision not to run again in the midterms, I’m sure has had an impact…</p>
<p>I agree most congressional gop want him gone, but they can’t be too open about it. </p>
<p>The abandonment of the Jan 6th useful idiots by the Gop speaks loudly, but they hoped to use it to get Trump and destroy Maga.</p>
<p><i> That kind of depends on how much of the GOP leadership, and some of the Republicans in Congress, side with Biden instead of Trump.<br />
Neither group wants him back.<br />
</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654005</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654005</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also (2) - Andrea Widburg agrees with Bob Hoge.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Today’s we-now-live-in-a-3rd-world-dictatorship news from the Biden administration is Merrick Garland’s breathtaking announcement that he has named a special counsel to conduct a criminal investigation into Donald Trump. Given the complete absence of evidence of any wrongdoing, it’s very clear that the Democrats are terrified of Trump and that they will do anything they can to destroy his candidacy. &lt;b&gt;My suspicion is that this will backfire and, instead, solidify Trump&#039;s support.&lt;/b&gt;

When Biden was asked about Trump’s plan to run again for president, there were lots of standard things he could have said, such as saying that he looks forward to a hard-fought campaign or that he doesn’t think Trump can win or that the American people won’t stand for yet another Trump term in office. Biden, however, said none of those things. Instead, Biden said something bizarre and fundamentally un-American: “Well, we just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by—if we—if he does run. I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.”

Ignore the obligatory cover language about “our Constitution.” &lt;b&gt;The key words are “I’m making sure he…does not become the next President again.” Today, we learned what Biden’s insurance policy is, and it has nothing to do with the Constitution. &lt;/b&gt;Instead, the Department of Justice is preparing the groundwork to bring criminal charges against Trump. That these charges are baseless is irrelevant. The point is to sideline the man Biden fears most.
...
January 6 is a well the left keeps going back to, but it’s been dry from the beginning. Trump wanted more security in D.C., but Pelosi refused. Trump told people only to exercise their First Amendment rights and to do so “peacefully and patriotically.” That is, Trump did nothing to foment criminal activity.

More importantly, we know that, thanks to people such as Ray Epps, many attendees at the rally were already induced to head to the Capitol even as Trump was still speaking. In the same vein, there’s footage showing people in whom the FBI mysteriously has no interest systematically removing all barriers and signage that would have alerted the crowd that they were in a prohibited area. Add to this the fact that we’ve learned that the FBI had agents and informers all over the place on January 6 and the word “entrapment” is the first thing that comes to mind.

Put another way: January 6 wasn’t criminal activity on Trump’s part, but it might have been criminal activity on the government’s part.

&lt;b&gt;They’ve got nothing on Trump, and they’ve never had anything on Trump—but the Biden administration is determined to use the process to destroy Trump. They’re fools because Trump has emerged stronger from every attack, and I’m betting he will this time too.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That kind of depends on how much of the GOP leadership, and some of the Republicans in Congress, side with Biden instead of Trump.
Neither group wants him back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also (2) &#8211; Andrea Widburg agrees with Bob Hoge.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Today’s we-now-live-in-a-3rd-world-dictatorship news from the Biden administration is Merrick Garland’s breathtaking announcement that he has named a special counsel to conduct a criminal investigation into Donald Trump. Given the complete absence of evidence of any wrongdoing, it’s very clear that the Democrats are terrified of Trump and that they will do anything they can to destroy his candidacy. <b>My suspicion is that this will backfire and, instead, solidify Trump&#8217;s support.</b></p>
<p>When Biden was asked about Trump’s plan to run again for president, there were lots of standard things he could have said, such as saying that he looks forward to a hard-fought campaign or that he doesn’t think Trump can win or that the American people won’t stand for yet another Trump term in office. Biden, however, said none of those things. Instead, Biden said something bizarre and fundamentally un-American: “Well, we just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by—if we—if he does run. I’m making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again.”</p>
<p>Ignore the obligatory cover language about “our Constitution.” <b>The key words are “I’m making sure he…does not become the next President again.” Today, we learned what Biden’s insurance policy is, and it has nothing to do with the Constitution. </b>Instead, the Department of Justice is preparing the groundwork to bring criminal charges against Trump. That these charges are baseless is irrelevant. The point is to sideline the man Biden fears most.<br />
&#8230;<br />
January 6 is a well the left keeps going back to, but it’s been dry from the beginning. Trump wanted more security in D.C., but Pelosi refused. Trump told people only to exercise their First Amendment rights and to do so “peacefully and patriotically.” That is, Trump did nothing to foment criminal activity.</p>
<p>More importantly, we know that, thanks to people such as Ray Epps, many attendees at the rally were already induced to head to the Capitol even as Trump was still speaking. In the same vein, there’s footage showing people in whom the FBI mysteriously has no interest systematically removing all barriers and signage that would have alerted the crowd that they were in a prohibited area. Add to this the fact that we’ve learned that the FBI had agents and informers all over the place on January 6 and the word “entrapment” is the first thing that comes to mind.</p>
<p>Put another way: January 6 wasn’t criminal activity on Trump’s part, but it might have been criminal activity on the government’s part.</p>
<p><b>They’ve got nothing on Trump, and they’ve never had anything on Trump—but the Biden administration is determined to use the process to destroy Trump. They’re fools because Trump has emerged stronger from every attack, and I’m betting he will this time too.</b></p></blockquote>
<p>That kind of depends on how much of the GOP leadership, and some of the Republicans in Congress, side with Biden instead of Trump.<br />
Neither group wants him back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/11/18/roundup-67/#comment-2654004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=122205#comment-2654004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In re (2) special counsel - Bob Hoge has some thoughts.
https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/11/19/could-dojs-special-counsel-actually-fire-up-support-for-donald-trump-n661197
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Voters, especially Trump’s base, could find renewed energy as they witness yet another overzealous prosecution of Orange Man Bad, and after watching so many failed efforts, they could (correctly) conclude that the Justice Department is simply an untrustworthy, politicized, partisan Democrat operation. In other words, Joe Biden’s enforcement arm:
...

Get this: back in the 1970s, Smith was a federal prosecutor who helped investigate The Donald for possible fraud charges. The case closed—wait for it… without charges. So if Trump has somewhat of a case of a persecution complex, you’d certainly understand why. This guy Smith has been after him for fifty years.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re (2) special counsel &#8211; Bob Hoge has some thoughts.<br />
<a href="https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/11/19/could-dojs-special-counsel-actually-fire-up-support-for-donald-trump-n661197" rel="nofollow ugc">https://redstate.com/bobhoge/2022/11/19/could-dojs-special-counsel-actually-fire-up-support-for-donald-trump-n661197</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
Voters, especially Trump’s base, could find renewed energy as they witness yet another overzealous prosecution of Orange Man Bad, and after watching so many failed efforts, they could (correctly) conclude that the Justice Department is simply an untrustworthy, politicized, partisan Democrat operation. In other words, Joe Biden’s enforcement arm:<br />
&#8230;</p>
<p>Get this: back in the 1970s, Smith was a federal prosecutor who helped investigate The Donald for possible fraud charges. The case closed—wait for it… without charges. So if Trump has somewhat of a case of a persecution complex, you’d certainly understand why. This guy Smith has been after him for fifty years.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
