Nope.

I was just thinking today about the increase in suburban women shifting to Republican candidates right now, ditto Blacks and Hispanics.

The second and third groups are, I think, seriously noting that their values and interests really are more aligned with the Right.
The first is looking around and seeing what a mess the Democrats made of their own lives and voting for Republicans to come in and fix things.
After which they will go right back to voting for the Democrats.

Much like refugees from Blue States who move to a better environment under conservative government, and promptly vote for the same party and policies that ruined the state they left.

It’s like they just can’t connect the dots.

Not only is it non-transferable, it’s not allowed.

Remember, Neo — The Liberal Midnight Reset Button®…

The Liberal Midnight Reset Button®The Liberal Midnight Reset Button® operates to protect Officially Accepted Liberal Dogma® from challenges to the latters’ “integrity”.

https://monsterhunternation.com/2020/11/09/election-2020-the-more-fuckery-update/#comment-99392

“Experience” which flies in the face of Officially Accepted Liberal Dogma® is ALWAYS removed from the memory files at the end of the day.

This is the main justification I’ve made for the notion that liberals are all “widiots”:

If there was a “WQ” test to match the “IQ” test, then self-defined liberals would all consistently measure in the lower 1/3rd of the resulting Normal distribution curve. They consistently would rate out as “widiots”.

Wisdom is how you learn from experience, just as IQ is how you learn from books. And liberals never learn from experience, which explains their incessant efforts to keep pushing the same fuckwit ideas like big government, light rail, and Marxism, no matter how many times it blows up in their faces.

American Thinker has a 11-yo piece where a gentleman by the name of Dov Fischer (which apparently there are at least two of who are notable of sorts — one is an accounting chairman at Brooklyn College, and the other, who wrote the article, is clearly not the same guy: “Dov Fischer, adjunct professor of law at Loyola Law School, is a columnist for several online magazines and is rabbi of Young Israel of Orange County.”)

The relevance of the background is significant to the nature of the latter’s comments in the article.

This description of the author is from his byline on The Federalist:
Dov Fischer, formerly Chief Articles Editor of UCLA Law Review and an adjunct professor of law at two Southern California law schools, is Senior Contributing Editor at The American Spectator

Now, the key issue with Obama is they keep saying “he’s so smart… blah blah blah blah”, but they refuse to allow you to see his transcripts which might make a case for that being the truth. A proper skeptic then needs to wonder… is he really?

June 1, 2011
Stop It Already — He’s Not So Smart
By Dov Fischer
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/06/stop_it_already_–_hes_not_so_smart.html

Quick selection of the Meat of it:

… So it is time to say it: Stop it already. We know that Barack Obama has unique gifts that elude many of us. For example, he manifestly avoids holding banister rails when he descends steps at airports because, unlike Republicans Gerald Ford and Bob Dole, he never slips. We are very impressed, those of us who keep our hands near the banister just in case. We know that he is professorial, says “uh” when thinking, drinks beer with professors. We are very impressed.

We would be more impressed if our transparent President would allow us to see his transcript from Columbia University and share with us how he managed to finance his education there. Or if he would allow us to read his senior thesis. Or allow us to see his transcript from Harvard Law School. Yes, we know he rose to be the president of Law Review, but there is a question that nags on that one, too:

I was Chief Articles Editor of UCLA Law Review and later had the honor of clerking for the Hon. Danny Julian Boggs of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, one of the nation’s most brilliant jurists, who later rose to become Chief Judge of the Sixth Circuit. To be selected as Chief Articles Editor, I had to research and write the Law Review Comment of a lifetime. In time, it was published and deemed good enough that I was named law review chief articles editor. In the years that followed, that Law Review Comment has been cited by federal courts in at least seven published judicial opinions, and in several other unpublished opinions. It has been cited and quoted often in other people’s legal scholarship.

And that is “how it works.” To be a law review editor-in-chief, a Chief Articles Editor, a Chief Comments Editor of a law review, it is a sine qua non that you publish something fabulous, a real scholarly piece of work. Many dozens of America’s finest law students do exactly that every year. Those articles later become part of a vast searchable electronic library of legal scholarship.

The thing is, I cannot find Barack Obama’s great piece of work, the scholarship one would presume he researched, drafted, crafted, and honed, that earned him the presidency of the Harvard Law Review. The name “Obama” is the kind of search term that should do the job. But I cannot find any scholarship published by him that reveals the exceptional brilliance that paved the way to his achievement. So there is no published scholarship that refutes the increasing sense so many of us share that we Americans elected a President who maybe is not so smart as the media’s campaign hype suggested…

The point is, maybe, just maybe, it’s “all fucking bullshit”?

And as an honest skeptic, one sorta-kinda needs to see some actual evidence of the claim?

Because he made a really stupid blunder with the “57 states” thing. And seriously? He did not understand how to pronounce “corpsman”?

Then add to that his rather lame head of state gifts — more than one — despite there being actual people whose JOB IT IS to pick these things out and advise on them?

And then there’s the bowing to other heads of state…

There are just soooo many things that anyone “that smart” would have picked up on during a lifetime of 45+ years of education and cultural learning.

Jus’ Sayin’… maybe we need to stop repeating what we’ve been TOLD.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/04/14/a_new_foundation_for_the_economy_obama_48911.html

Paul Rahe wrote for Powerline quite a bit early in Obama’s presidency. He had some fascinating insights about his use of gestures to insult his opponents – a series of pieces that provided a unique perspective on the man.

I have said that pretty much all of the anti-Trump feelings from them was “mean tweets”, at least that I heard.

Just a thought: Things were going so well under Trump, and much of that, without offsets, helped suburban white women, so that there was nothing to complain about. But the good stuff…just happened. Wasn’t anybody’s doing.
Just happened.
Which left mean tweets sort of hanging there in isolation, ready for the self-righteous who had nothing else to complain about.

it’s arguable where the near east expeditions ran aground, clinton did precious little, maybe w did too much, it was stark arrogance to think we could run countries as heterodox from our experience as afghanistan and iraq,