Comments on: Nobody, but nobody, wants Biden to run in 2024

By: miguel cervantes

miguel cervantes — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:42:54 +0000

They really hate us that much to subject us to her ramblings

By: Geoffrey Britain

Geoffrey Britain — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 15:35:35 +0000

Biden’s departure prior to 2024 puts Harris in the oval office. Which would ensure the loss of the WH in 2024.
Biden will not be allowed to run for reelection. Harris will lose the 2024 nomination to Newsome.

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 08:03:34 +0000

This seems unjust:
“National Black Farmers Association leader blasts Biden for ‘breaking promises’;
“Through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), Biden attempted to cancel $4 billion in debt owed by farmers of color.”—
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/national-black-farmers-association-leader-blasts-biden-breaking-promises

Don’t they know that “POTUS” can’t remember a thing, that remembering “stuff” is NOT in fact part of “his” job description and that “he” is fully entitled to make things up as “he” goes along?

Astonishing that they haven’t been paying attention.

(Maybe they should consider changing their name to the “National We-Ain’t-Black Farmers Association”…)

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 06:38:37 +0000

Looks like we have a “Quote of the day” (“Can’t see the forest for the trees” edition):

‘…“What if I want to go that way?” the president appears to ask at one point, to which someone responds off camera, “You can go that way if you want.”
“You can do whatever you want,” another staffer assures the president….’
https://nypost.com/2022/10/25/biden-appears-to-get-lost-after-white-house-tree-planting-event/
Yep, the Emperor of Ice Cream can do whatever he wants.
Or rather…
“He” can do whatever “he” wants….

Any repercussions at the “polling booths”?
Certainly should be…but I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
And hope…

By: Jordan Rivers

Jordan Rivers — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 04:24:25 +0000

I’d like to see Biden run in 2022, with a raw steak in his underwear and a couple of his vicious dogs chasing him!

By: PA+Cat

PA+Cat — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 02:56:06 +0000

“Running” is an odd verb to use for a guy who’s barely ambulatory. “Sleepwalking” would be a better description of a hypothetical Biden 2024 campaign: As one reporter noted, “The ‘president’ fell asleep on camera in the middle of a televised interview.”

https://legalinsurrection.com/2022/10/sleepy-biden-strikes-again-while-discussing-his-intention-to-run-in-2024/

By: Aggie

Aggie — Tue, 25 Oct 2022 02:22:41 +0000

This MSNBC Focus Group of Trump voters talked about Jan 6th.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jbaUt-lla4

Reasonably well-informed and mostly on top of issues; interesting, compared to the other group. But not very well-received by the team in the studio.

By: Jimmy

Jimmy — Mon, 24 Oct 2022 23:56:21 +0000

Nobody? I want him to run just to see him lose by 60-40 in the popular vote and 300 EVs.

By: Leland

Leland — Mon, 24 Oct 2022 20:33:15 +0000

Art Deco; that second paragraph of yours (@2:28p) is epic. Well done! Sad for our country that it is so true. A bad Democratic slate allows for a bad Republican one.

By: Rufus T. Firefly

Rufus T. Firefly — Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:50:47 +0000

Watching the clip I was struck by how absurd the whole production seems. It’s a format I’ve seen a million times; a “focus group” being interviewed by a “journalist.” But now, in the light of the myriad ways the media have diminished their profession in the past years, the tableau is beyond farce. The focus grip is fully aware of the scam and are no longer going along with it.

Ace recently posted a similar clip with a “journalist” interviewing a Republican, Democrat and Independent. The epitome of “regular folks,” just like the groups in this video, but none of them are drawn in by the pageantry. They see through the pomp and circumstance. They see behind the curtain and know these journalists are paid performers.

Good stuff!