I must disagree. If Trump is handled roughly while Biden’s son and thousands of real rioters are handled with kid gloves, a lot of us are going to want to teach Slow Joe a lesson he will never forget… okay, that’s a figure of speech, but you know what I mean!

https://mobile.twitter.com/mrddmia/status/1570961258891079680?cxt=HHwWgMDTgaK8ls0rAAAA

Whether Trump is indicted or not is irrelevant to control of Congress come January. If Republicans can’t takeover Congress, then the Supreme Court won’t be enough to protect our Republic. Already, Biden is creating EOs that appropriate hundreds of billions without a peep from Congress. With his speech, the weaponization of the DOJ, and the ability to spend money without legislative checks; we are already in a dictatorship. Trump’s indictment will only be the most recognizable start of the purging of undesirables.

any clearheaded observer, could see the doj didn’t have a case, but the Kultursmog (ht emmett tyrell) has reached northeaster dimensions,

They object to the master because that will result in the collapse of their propagandistic innuendo.

Leland,

“Already Trump is the discussion heading into the 2022 election, when the discussion should be about Biden and Democrats disastrous 2 years.”

No discussion is needed. Everyone knows of the oncoming disaster that the democrats have wrought and where responsibility for it rightfully lies. Those who now vote for democrats reveal that they place ideology over their fellow citizen’s livelihoods and even lives.

Those who seek to abrogate other people’s right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”… forfeit their own claim to those rights.

Of course McConnell has done “it” in previous cycles. What is this “it” whereof you speak? Of course he puts money where he thinks it’s best spent, and has a tendency to support more moderate candidates who both reflect his own positions and who are polling pretty well against their opponents. He’s also put money behind Trump-friendly and more extreme candidates.

I don’t think the evidence that this is some sort of sabotage by McConnell is very strong. I also don’t buy the idea that he doesn’t want the GOP to control the Senate. I just don’t see evidence of it that convinces me. Most of the chatter about it is destructive clickbait, IMHO. It’s an old story, and not just with McConnell.

I’d actually prefer someone more to the right of McConnell to be the leader of the GOP in the Senate, but I don’t demonize him to the extent that many people do.

I don’t know about Graham’s history on abortion, but Rubio has been a hardliner on the subject for a long long time. Whether their proposal is politically expedient (I don’t think it is) or not, I believe Rubio at least is quite sincere.

and you see how little he has cared to speak on a issue of fundamental fairness,
now graham who was snoring in some cloakroom now takes up the partial birth issue, as if he and rubio really cared about that,

I’m not a McConnell fan, but I don’t automatically assume this is happening for pernicious reasons – although of course it might be. However, the money is not unlimited, and they put it where they think they can get the most bang for their bucks at a certain time. Right now, for example, a lot of money is going to Vance and not to Masters, but they’re saying it will probably go to Masters later (I found an article on this yesterday but didn’t bookmark it, and can’t seem to find it again at the moment).