<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Traitor Trump	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I’m a known TEA Party member. I hand delivered a letter to Patty Murray back in 2009 during a TEA Party demonstration. And have written many e-mails since. But Susan DelBene, my representative, has been very sensitive about argumentative e-mails since Jan 6. Could be either one or both who have put the IRS on my case. I think they are trying to get me to commit some infraction, but if unable, to create a lot of stress and expense for me.

You get a notice from the IRS, and you wonder, what did I do wrong?&lt;/i&gt;

JJ:

Thanks for the response. I think you&#039;ve got your head on straight.

I got audited once when I was a leftist, but I&#039;m pretty sure it was because I also worked as a consultant and took deductions. Fortunately I kept my receipts.

I don&#039;t trust the bastids!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m a known TEA Party member. I hand delivered a letter to Patty Murray back in 2009 during a TEA Party demonstration. And have written many e-mails since. But Susan DelBene, my representative, has been very sensitive about argumentative e-mails since Jan 6. Could be either one or both who have put the IRS on my case. I think they are trying to get me to commit some infraction, but if unable, to create a lot of stress and expense for me.</p>
<p>You get a notice from the IRS, and you wonder, what did I do wrong?</i></p>
<p>JJ:</p>
<p>Thanks for the response. I think you&#8217;ve got your head on straight.</p>
<p>I got audited once when I was a leftist, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it was because I also worked as a consultant and took deductions. Fortunately I kept my receipts.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust the bastids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640720</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640720</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I’m also studying math, at this point trying to understand the logic of proofs.”&lt;/i&gt;

apple betty:

A cafe friend recommended Hammack&#039;s &quot;Book of Proof.&quot; The PDF is available free:

https://www.people.vcu.edu/~rhammack/BookOfProof/index.html

I&#039;ve only browsed it, but it looks good and you can&#039;t beat the price!

Recently I had the thought that calculus is hard because it&#039;s like climbing a major mountain peak -- there are multiple subgoals, each requiring different equipment and techniques. For instance, in calculus there are four different non-trivial notations, one must master:

Limits
Sigma (Summation)
Derivative/Differential 
Integral

It&#039;s not like high school algebra which boils down to addition, multiplication and variables, then everything after is just increasingly complex variations of those.

Calculus was a major project of mathematics, a group effort, rather like putting a man on the moon. And we certainly couldn&#039;t have put a man on the moon without calculus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m also studying math, at this point trying to understand the logic of proofs.”</i></p>
<p>apple betty:</p>
<p>A cafe friend recommended Hammack&#8217;s &#8220;Book of Proof.&#8221; The PDF is available free:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.people.vcu.edu/~rhammack/BookOfProof/index.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.people.vcu.edu/~rhammack/BookOfProof/index.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only browsed it, but it looks good and you can&#8217;t beat the price!</p>
<p>Recently I had the thought that calculus is hard because it&#8217;s like climbing a major mountain peak &#8212; there are multiple subgoals, each requiring different equipment and techniques. For instance, in calculus there are four different non-trivial notations, one must master:</p>
<p>Limits<br />
Sigma (Summation)<br />
Derivative/Differential<br />
Integral</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like high school algebra which boils down to addition, multiplication and variables, then everything after is just increasingly complex variations of those.</p>
<p>Calculus was a major project of mathematics, a group effort, rather like putting a man on the moon. And we certainly couldn&#8217;t have put a man on the moon without calculus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640663</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Andrew McCarthy is making the case for indicting Trump for &#039;causing false statements to be made&#039; and &#039;obstruction of justice&#039;.  Another self-licking ice cream cone from the Department of Justice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew McCarthy is making the case for indicting Trump for &#8216;causing false statements to be made&#8217; and &#8216;obstruction of justice&#8217;.  Another self-licking ice cream cone from the Department of Justice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jordan Rivers		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan Rivers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;...YEARS of lying, malfeasance, corruption, and at-best-borderline seditious behavior by elements in America’s law enforcement, judiciary, intelligence community, and federal bureaucracy when it comes to Donald Trump.&lt;/i&gt;

I would include elements of Congress and Media in this bucket of scum.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8230;YEARS of lying, malfeasance, corruption, and at-best-borderline seditious behavior by elements in America’s law enforcement, judiciary, intelligence community, and federal bureaucracy when it comes to Donald Trump.</i></p>
<p>I would include elements of Congress and Media in this bucket of scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: stan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640640</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bauxite,

You really ought to brush up on the facts. We KNOW there was no emergency because we know they talked about it for months and didn&#039;t execute for days. We know there&#039;s no claim of irreparable harm for a host of reasons. And we know this wasn&#039;t the least intrusive way to accomplish the goal because of the nature of the raid and the DOJ responses.

The documents could be critical -- like the names of assets working for enemy governments (like the Clintons sold), You can&#039;t possibly justify the raid on the basis of what any docs involve. Because that doesn&#039;t meet the requirement of irreparable harm. You have to show that the docs were headed somewhere into the hands of enemies. Mere possession doesn&#039;t do that.

Remember, the NSA, FBI, DOJ and Democrat contractors still monitor every communication by Trump or anyone he contacts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bauxite,</p>
<p>You really ought to brush up on the facts. We KNOW there was no emergency because we know they talked about it for months and didn&#8217;t execute for days. We know there&#8217;s no claim of irreparable harm for a host of reasons. And we know this wasn&#8217;t the least intrusive way to accomplish the goal because of the nature of the raid and the DOJ responses.</p>
<p>The documents could be critical &#8212; like the names of assets working for enemy governments (like the Clintons sold), You can&#8217;t possibly justify the raid on the basis of what any docs involve. Because that doesn&#8217;t meet the requirement of irreparable harm. You have to show that the docs were headed somewhere into the hands of enemies. Mere possession doesn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Remember, the NSA, FBI, DOJ and Democrat contractors still monitor every communication by Trump or anyone he contacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MBunge		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MBunge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;So the whole issue turns on what the documents are and whether Trump had a right to possess them.&quot;


No, that&#039;s NOT what the whole issue turns on.  What the whole issue turns on is YEARS of lying, malfeasance, corruption, and at-best-borderline seditious behavior by elements in America&#039;s law enforcement, judiciary, intelligence community, and federal bureaucracy when it comes to Donald Trump.

Of all the ills of modernity, the idiotic habit of defaulting to zero and ignoring everything that happened in the past is perhaps the most infuriating.

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So the whole issue turns on what the documents are and whether Trump had a right to possess them.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, that&#8217;s NOT what the whole issue turns on.  What the whole issue turns on is YEARS of lying, malfeasance, corruption, and at-best-borderline seditious behavior by elements in America&#8217;s law enforcement, judiciary, intelligence community, and federal bureaucracy when it comes to Donald Trump.</p>
<p>Of all the ills of modernity, the idiotic habit of defaulting to zero and ignoring everything that happened in the past is perhaps the most infuriating.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640629</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 17:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Art Deco – I understand that the criminal statutes cited by the DOJ don’t require that the documents be classified. &lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re stretching here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Art Deco – I understand that the criminal statutes cited by the DOJ don’t require that the documents be classified. </i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re stretching here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640628</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 17:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bauxite, the sage of equivalency.

As Humpty Dumpty said the important thing is who decides what words mean. Seems the GSxx fed employees in some alphabet agency are the ultimate deciders to Bauxite.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bauxite, the sage of equivalency.</p>
<p>As Humpty Dumpty said the important thing is who decides what words mean. Seems the GSxx fed employees in some alphabet agency are the ultimate deciders to Bauxite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 17:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Comprende? Poor Vlad, he means well.  Comprende, senor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comprende? Poor Vlad, he means well.  Comprende, senor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bauxite		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/31/traitor-trump/#comment-2640625</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bauxite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=120137#comment-2640625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[stan - I agree with your 3 part test, but don&#039;t think that you can know whether the DOJ meets that test without knowing the nature of the documents at MAL. That goes to your 1 and 2. As to 3, there are reports that there were informal requests and even a grand jury subpoena that were ignored. If that&#039;s true, whatever those documents are, it would be hard to argue that the government was going to take possession of them without executing a warrant. 

So the whole issue turns on what the documents are and whether Trump had a right to possess them. On that, we know nothing except by the leaks and propaganda coming from both sides.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stan &#8211; I agree with your 3 part test, but don&#8217;t think that you can know whether the DOJ meets that test without knowing the nature of the documents at MAL. That goes to your 1 and 2. As to 3, there are reports that there were informal requests and even a grand jury subpoena that were ignored. If that&#8217;s true, whatever those documents are, it would be hard to argue that the government was going to take possession of them without executing a warrant. </p>
<p>So the whole issue turns on what the documents are and whether Trump had a right to possess them. On that, we know nothing except by the leaks and propaganda coming from both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
