<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump&#8217;s lawyers describe the irregularities of the Mar-A-Lago raid	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: All About The Mar-A-Lago Raid &#124; Tai-Chi Policy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2639204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[All About The Mar-A-Lago Raid &#124; Tai-Chi Policy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 22:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2639204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Trump&#8217;s attorneys have a breakdown of the unusuality/likely illegality of the warrant. And they wanted the security cameras off and refused to turn over the warrant. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Trump&#8217;s attorneys have a breakdown of the unusuality/likely illegality of the warrant. And they wanted the security cameras off and refused to turn over the warrant. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Whitehall		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637252</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whitehall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637252</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tell us more about the second video, the one from a &quot;YouTube account that has now been TERMINATED.&quot;

That raises a lot of questions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell us more about the second video, the one from a &#8220;YouTube account that has now been TERMINATED.&#8221;</p>
<p>That raises a lot of questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TR		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 21:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi neo,
 Thanks for the information about the search warrant. 
 Yeah, I&#039;m wondering about when the warrant will be unsealed, + stuff like that. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi neo,<br />
 Thanks for the information about the search warrant.<br />
 Yeah, I&#8217;m wondering about when the warrant will be unsealed, + stuff like that. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[About the warrant --

The court has sealed it, and various entities are suing to get it unsealed.  It is not unusual to seal a warrant but ordinarily it&#039;s only done until the search occurs and then it&#039;s unsealed.  So extending the sealing is very unusual.  As far as I know, Trump was not given a copy; at least that&#039;s my impression from what I&#039;ve read so far.  If he did have a copy, I would assume he would not be allowed to show it, because of the sealing.  But I&#039;m not 100% sure that&#039;s how it would work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the warrant &#8212;</p>
<p>The court has sealed it, and various entities are suing to get it unsealed.  It is not unusual to seal a warrant but ordinarily it&#8217;s only done until the search occurs and then it&#8217;s unsealed.  So extending the sealing is very unusual.  As far as I know, Trump was not given a copy; at least that&#8217;s my impression from what I&#8217;ve read so far.  If he did have a copy, I would assume he would not be allowed to show it, because of the sealing.  But I&#8217;m not 100% sure that&#8217;s how it would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Another example of the FBI getting out of line.&lt;/i&gt;

 Stanley Levison and Jack O&#039;Dell were in the King entourage.  The FBI had a legitimate interest in keeping an eye on them given their history and intersection with a prominent extraparliamentary politician.  What they shouldn&#039;t have been doing was bag jobs without probable cause and judicial sanction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Another example of the FBI getting out of line.</i></p>
<p> Stanley Levison and Jack O&#8217;Dell were in the King entourage.  The FBI had a legitimate interest in keeping an eye on them given their history and intersection with a prominent extraparliamentary politician.  What they shouldn&#8217;t have been doing was bag jobs without probable cause and judicial sanction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TR		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi physicsguy,

 As I understand it, after reading the article that I mentioned above, is that-
 [The U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida] has sealed the search warrant, in this event.

 As I understand it-

 by SEALING the search warrant, the court has decided that the warrant [has sensitive information in it], and that means [the court says] this warrant can&#039;t be seen by the public, AND that if, in my opinion, if the court, or Trump, or anyone shows this warrant to the public, [while the warrant is still sealed], then these people are BREAKING THE LAW.

 Please, do we have a legal expert, reading this site?

 Is this what happens, when [a court seals a document?]

 Please tell us what you think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi physicsguy,</p>
<p> As I understand it, after reading the article that I mentioned above, is that-<br />
 [The U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Florida] has sealed the search warrant, in this event.</p>
<p> As I understand it-</p>
<p> by SEALING the search warrant, the court has decided that the warrant [has sensitive information in it], and that means [the court says] this warrant can&#8217;t be seen by the public, AND that if, in my opinion, if the court, or Trump, or anyone shows this warrant to the public, [while the warrant is still sealed], then these people are BREAKING THE LAW.</p>
<p> Please, do we have a legal expert, reading this site?</p>
<p> Is this what happens, when [a court seals a document?]</p>
<p> Please tell us what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike K		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One consequence of this raid is that it may have re-elected Trump.  On the other hand, it may now be down to assassination.  I hope he has good personal security.  I don&#039;t trust the Secret Service any more than the fbi.  Remember the SS agent (female) who said she would not take a bullet for Trump?

Remember the SS agent who retired when Reagan left office and continued as his personal friend and protector?  Those days are gone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One consequence of this raid is that it may have re-elected Trump.  On the other hand, it may now be down to assassination.  I hope he has good personal security.  I don&#8217;t trust the Secret Service any more than the fbi.  Remember the SS agent (female) who said she would not take a bullet for Trump?</p>
<p>Remember the SS agent who retired when Reagan left office and continued as his personal friend and protector?  Those days are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: physicsguy		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[physicsguy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just saw that about Judicial Watch.  

Just to be clear, I think the raid was one of the most egregious things Ive ever witnessed by the government.  However, I also just read that Trump has the warrant and could release it on his own.  True???  And if so, why hasn&#039;t he released it?  Not a good look, but then I also don&#039;t understand all the legalities his lawyers are dealing with by releasing the warrant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw that about Judicial Watch.  </p>
<p>Just to be clear, I think the raid was one of the most egregious things Ive ever witnessed by the government.  However, I also just read that Trump has the warrant and could release it on his own.  True???  And if so, why hasn&#8217;t he released it?  Not a good look, but then I also don&#8217;t understand all the legalities his lawyers are dealing with by releasing the warrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TR		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 16:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An Albany, New York- newspaper, + the watchdog group, Judicial Watch, ask that the search warrant used in this search, be [unsealed], + shown to the US public.
 
 They say the public HAS A RIGHT to see this entire search warrant.

 I think they want to see that this warrant is a LEGAL warrant.

 More on that story, here:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-fbi-raid-albany-times-union-judicial-watch-request-release-mar-a-lago-search-warrant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Albany, New York- newspaper, + the watchdog group, Judicial Watch, ask that the search warrant used in this search, be [unsealed], + shown to the US public.</p>
<p> They say the public HAS A RIGHT to see this entire search warrant.</p>
<p> I think they want to see that this warrant is a LEGAL warrant.</p>
<p> More on that story, here:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-fbi-raid-albany-times-union-judicial-watch-request-release-mar-a-lago-search-warrant" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-fbi-raid-albany-times-union-judicial-watch-request-release-mar-a-lago-search-warrant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/08/10/trumps-lawyers-describe-the-irregularities-of-the-mar-a-lago-raid/#comment-2637066</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=119491#comment-2637066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Why were 3 DOJ lawyers present at the raid? Government lawyers don’t go along to execute search warrants, that’s strictly a law-enforcement function. It’s a bad idea in principle because, when the legality of the raid is later contested in court those lawyers become witnesses and can’t act as advocates for the government. This is yet more evidence that this was a stunt, political theater, not a serious search for evidence.&lt;/i&gt;

Evidence that (1) they brought along Kevin Asshole, JD to try to intimidate the staff and any other lawyers present or (2) DoJ lawyers don&#039;t have enough work to do.  Remember the investigation run by Lawrence Walsh, special-prosecutor-for-life?   The odious Jeffrey Toobin, then aged 27 and a year out of law school, was hired by Walsh.  He&#039;d been a clerk to some federal judge prior to that.  Don&#039;t know what clerks to federal judges were paid in 1987, but I do know what their counterparts employed by the Appellate Division in New York were paid in that era and Toobin&#039;s starting salary was twice what those young lawyers were receiving.  Then Toobin was permitted to spend large blocs of time attending trials and taking notes for a book project on which he was working.  (He was bound by some disclosure rules, so the book&#039;s typescript had to be reviewed by lawyers in the office after it was completed and he&#039;d left federal employment.  The man in the office who took time out to read Toobin&#039;s typescript was the very very busy &lt;i&gt;Lawrence Walsh&lt;/i&gt;).  You&#039;ll recall, I assume, that by 1992 Walsh, while still the titular &#039;special prosecutor&#039;, was living in Oklahoma City.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why were 3 DOJ lawyers present at the raid? Government lawyers don’t go along to execute search warrants, that’s strictly a law-enforcement function. It’s a bad idea in principle because, when the legality of the raid is later contested in court those lawyers become witnesses and can’t act as advocates for the government. This is yet more evidence that this was a stunt, political theater, not a serious search for evidence.</i></p>
<p>Evidence that (1) they brought along Kevin Asshole, JD to try to intimidate the staff and any other lawyers present or (2) DoJ lawyers don&#8217;t have enough work to do.  Remember the investigation run by Lawrence Walsh, special-prosecutor-for-life?   The odious Jeffrey Toobin, then aged 27 and a year out of law school, was hired by Walsh.  He&#8217;d been a clerk to some federal judge prior to that.  Don&#8217;t know what clerks to federal judges were paid in 1987, but I do know what their counterparts employed by the Appellate Division in New York were paid in that era and Toobin&#8217;s starting salary was twice what those young lawyers were receiving.  Then Toobin was permitted to spend large blocs of time attending trials and taking notes for a book project on which he was working.  (He was bound by some disclosure rules, so the book&#8217;s typescript had to be reviewed by lawyers in the office after it was completed and he&#8217;d left federal employment.  The man in the office who took time out to read Toobin&#8217;s typescript was the very very busy <i>Lawrence Walsh</i>).  You&#8217;ll recall, I assume, that by 1992 Walsh, while still the titular &#8216;special prosecutor&#8217;, was living in Oklahoma City.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
