Comments on: SCOTUS is on a roll

By: LeClerc

LeClerc — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:25:30 +0000

One great ruling after another. The Thomas Court Rocks!

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:23:51 +0000

SCOTUS may be “on a roll”…but the severely morally-compromised Stasi pit-bulls of the SEC are at it again…
“Firm merging with Trump’s Truth Social parent company faces grand jury subpoenas;
“The jury is seeking information about the company’s merger with Trump’s TMTG”—
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/firm-merging-trumps-truth-social-faces-grand-jury-subpoenas

By: Tom Grey

Tom Grey — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:26:19 +0000

One reason I always read Neo, and seldom Ace, is the lack of snark*, no “Sarah Day O’Connor” disrespect to Sandra. Even when I agree that many of Sandra’s opinions, like the Lemon Test, are a bit ditsy.

Conservatives should be pushing an amendment to the Constitution to explicitly allow states to offer educational student vouchers on a per student basis including to religious schools which teach based on religious beliefs.

The de facto establishment of atheism as the state religion continues to create students whose values are less good than religious based values.

[*I’m not fully consistent on snark, usually also reading Steve Sailor whose snarky posts on the rise of Black car deaths is played down by the Dem media; but it doesn’t add enjoyment for me. I’m truly sad about the truth about the ditsy Dem decisions.]

By: Robert Shotzberger

Robert Shotzberger — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 02:04:35 +0000

The relief of pain is part of the Hippocratic Oath. It is part of what a doctor is suppose to do. Political interference of that is what is criminal.

By: Watt

Watt — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 01:04:25 +0000

I have read through the Ruan opinions (majority and concurrence) once and will have to do so at least one more time to figure out the legal nuances. But the majority opinion struck me as extremely forced. I think statutes should be read in their grammatical sense; the majority violates this common-sense principle to make its holding work, except that I don’t think that it works. J Alito’s concurrence makes much more sense. Unfortunately, the majority opinion is the opinion of the court, and the lower federal courts will have to attempt to apply it. As far as I understand, the states can deal with the interplay between elements of a crime and affirmative defenses, and how burdens of proof and persuasion work, in their own ways.

By: OldTexan

OldTexan — Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:33:08 +0000

Although I never really cared for Trump when he started gaining traction in the election I was being him, thinking that if this silly, obnoxious man could get elected and give us one more vote on the Supreme Court he had my vote. Lots of other folk at that time were not on board.

By: Geoffrey Britain

Geoffrey Britain — Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:27:23 +0000

“The Supreme Court held “the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly or intentionally acted in an unauthorized manner.”

The problem here is that the goverment and medical “authorities” are so corrupted as to be willing participants in mass murder.

“It’s Time To Admit The FDA Is The Enemy Of The People, And Is Killing Americans For The Globalist Agenda”

“They are fast-tracking killer shots for infants.

They are promoting killer shots for big pharma and the globalist agenda.

The vaccinated are dropping like flies on a hot southern afternoon.

The FDA under Biden has no accountability!

The FDA now wants to approve new mRNA killer shots with no safety trials.”

https://creativedestructionmedia.com/opinion/2022/06/25/its-time-to-admit-the-fda-is-the-enemy-of-the-people-and-is-killing-americans-for-the-globalist-agenda/

“FDA plans to abandon clinical trials for future Covid Vaccines…”
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-fdas-future-framework-for-covid-vaccines-is-reckless-plan/

JohnTyler,
“Sotomayer, Kagan, and a third judge dissented saying, in part, that school kids are vulnerable and need to be protected.”

Either blatant hypocrisy or cognitive dysfunction, in either case Prima Facie evidence of unfitness for the office held.

By: TommyJay

TommyJay — Mon, 27 Jun 2022 23:05:12 +0000

Having read most of the details of football coach case, I would agree with decision.

But for purely political reasons, I almost wish that the coach had been forcing all the players to pray just before the games started, and that the SCOTUS would have then allowed the lower court ruling to stand. Then we could have said, “See, the 5 or 6 justices are not ideologs.”

Now we’ve got this “Catholic cabal” meme really rolling. The New Puritans!

By: JohnTyler

JohnTyler — Mon, 27 Jun 2022 22:49:47 +0000

RE: SCOTUS deciding that it’s OK for a football coach leading prayers on the field .

Sotomayer, Kagan, and a third judge dissented saying, in part, that school kids are vulnerable and need to be protected.

Yet somehow, it’s OK for drag queens to perform their adult only shows in front of grammar school kids.

By: fullmoon

fullmoon — Mon, 27 Jun 2022 21:34:04 +0000

Sad state of affairs when doctors are afraid to prescribe pain killers.
There were some doctors abusing the system. I suspect they were at the bottom of the barrel,competence wise.
Same a Drs. specializing in abortion. Can’t cut it in the real world.