<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Durham waited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:45:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oops. In the previous post, the &quot;Key grafs&quot; should go under the first link.

Also, forgot to add: H/T Blazingcatfur blog (for both links).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops. In the previous post, the &#8220;Key grafs&#8221; should go under the first link.</p>
<p>Also, forgot to add: H/T Blazingcatfur blog (for both links).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...And 61 judges said nothing of the sort. They didn’t look at the evidence. Prior to the election nearly all the judges said the cases were premature. After the election they said they were too late.&quot;

Nifty little trick, that!...

Related (sort of):
&quot;The Left Dominates the Legal System, and They’re Taking Down GOP Election Attorneys en Masse&quot;---
https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2022/05/30/the-left-dominates-the-legal-system-and-theyre-taking-down-gop-election-attorneys-en-masse-n2607956
- - - - - - - - - - -
+ Bonus (AKA &quot;Success Revisited...Canadian Edition):
&#039;Liberals Ridiculed After Claiming They’re Making “Life More Affordable For Canadians”&#039;---
https://blazingcatfur.ca/2022/05/31/liberals-ridiculed-after-claiming-theyre-making-life-more-affordable-for-canadians/
Key grafs:
&quot;...The day after the 2020 presidential election, I predicted the left was going to target any attorney who dared to get involved challenging election fraud. They’d already started successfully targeting conservative attorneys, it just hadn’t gotten much attention yet. ...
&quot;... The left has developed a powerfully coordinated legal election effort under the leadership of left-wing lawyer Marc Elias. In recent years, he has successfully brought together a coalition of left-wing nonprofit groups to work in conjunction with each other on elections....&quot;

Wherin the charming, incredible Marc Elias raises his criminal-soaked head yet again....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;And 61 judges said nothing of the sort. They didn’t look at the evidence. Prior to the election nearly all the judges said the cases were premature. After the election they said they were too late.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nifty little trick, that!&#8230;</p>
<p>Related (sort of):<br />
&#8220;The Left Dominates the Legal System, and They’re Taking Down GOP Election Attorneys en Masse&#8221;&#8212;<br />
<a href="https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2022/05/30/the-left-dominates-the-legal-system-and-theyre-taking-down-gop-election-attorneys-en-masse-n2607956" rel="nofollow ugc">https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2022/05/30/the-left-dominates-the-legal-system-and-theyre-taking-down-gop-election-attorneys-en-masse-n2607956</a><br />
&#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;<br />
+ Bonus (AKA &#8220;Success Revisited&#8230;Canadian Edition):<br />
&#8216;Liberals Ridiculed After Claiming They’re Making “Life More Affordable For Canadians”&#8217;&#8212;<br />
<a href="https://blazingcatfur.ca/2022/05/31/liberals-ridiculed-after-claiming-theyre-making-life-more-affordable-for-canadians/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://blazingcatfur.ca/2022/05/31/liberals-ridiculed-after-claiming-theyre-making-life-more-affordable-for-canadians/</a><br />
Key grafs:<br />
&#8220;&#8230;The day after the 2020 presidential election, I predicted the left was going to target any attorney who dared to get involved challenging election fraud. They’d already started successfully targeting conservative attorneys, it just hadn’t gotten much attention yet. &#8230;<br />
&#8220;&#8230; The left has developed a powerfully coordinated legal election effort under the leadership of left-wing lawyer Marc Elias. In recent years, he has successfully brought together a coalition of left-wing nonprofit groups to work in conjunction with each other on elections&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wherin the charming, incredible Marc Elias raises his criminal-soaked head yet again&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paul J is not up to Montage&#039;s level of duplicity but give him time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul J is not up to Montage&#8217;s level of duplicity but give him time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 12:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The New Normal Is Failure&quot;---
https://instapundit.com/522941/

Alas; but would it be too much to hope that &quot;The Failure&quot; will fail...?

(To hope for and even more to work for....)

To be sure, the &quot;only&quot; logical problem with this conception is that &quot;Biden&quot; is firmly convinced that &quot;he&quot; is succeeding.

Succeeding, that is, in &quot;his&quot; overarching goal...which, indisputably, &quot;he&quot; is.
Alas....

...such that the author of the above-linked article might well have to go full Orwell and create a compound neologism so as to express the absolute absurdity of the current pathetic predicament in all its nauseating, gory glory....

If it were any help (though it&#039;s probably not) I would propose...&quot;SUCCURE&quot;...for which the &#039;Ministry&quot;---i.e., Department (in the US)---would, following in the great man&#039;s superbly succinct inventiveness, likely have to be MiniSucc&quot;... 

Not perfect, mind you, but it might just fit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The New Normal Is Failure&#8221;&#8212;<br />
<a href="https://instapundit.com/522941/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://instapundit.com/522941/</a></p>
<p>Alas; but would it be too much to hope that &#8220;The Failure&#8221; will fail&#8230;?</p>
<p>(To hope for and even more to work for&#8230;.)</p>
<p>To be sure, the &#8220;only&#8221; logical problem with this conception is that &#8220;Biden&#8221; is firmly convinced that &#8220;he&#8221; is succeeding.</p>
<p>Succeeding, that is, in &#8220;his&#8221; overarching goal&#8230;which, indisputably, &#8220;he&#8221; is.<br />
Alas&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8230;such that the author of the above-linked article might well have to go full Orwell and create a compound neologism so as to express the absolute absurdity of the current pathetic predicament in all its nauseating, gory glory&#8230;.</p>
<p>If it were any help (though it&#8217;s probably not) I would propose&#8230;&#8221;SUCCURE&#8221;&#8230;for which the &#8216;Ministry&#8221;&#8212;i.e., Department (in the US)&#8212;would, following in the great man&#8217;s superbly succinct inventiveness, likely have to be MiniSucc&#8221;&#8230; </p>
<p>Not perfect, mind you, but it might just fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 11:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paul J:

Voting fraud is almost impossible to detect and prove after the fact.  That&#039;s why it&#039;s so important to the left to create laws that make it possible and easier to accomplish fraud.  

&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/01/barr-no-evidence-of-fraud-election-outcome-441832&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Barr said that&lt;/a&gt; there was no &lt;i&gt;evidence&lt;/i&gt; of significant fraud that would change the results of the election.  

He said that less than a month after the election.  It would be a very stupid group of fraudsters to have left such a trail of evidence that it could have been discovered so quickly, and unless they stamped every fraudulent ballot with the word &quot;fraud&quot; there also would never be a way to know if the election was affected or not, because the ballots once separated from their envelopes were untraceable.

And 61 judges said nothing of the sort. They didn&#039;t look at the evidence.  Prior to the election nearly all the judges said the cases were premature.  After the election they said they were too late.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul J:</p>
<p>Voting fraud is almost impossible to detect and prove after the fact.  That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so important to the left to create laws that make it possible and easier to accomplish fraud.  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/01/barr-no-evidence-of-fraud-election-outcome-441832" rel="nofollow ugc">Barr said that</a> there was no <i>evidence</i> of significant fraud that would change the results of the election.  </p>
<p>He said that less than a month after the election.  It would be a very stupid group of fraudsters to have left such a trail of evidence that it could have been discovered so quickly, and unless they stamped every fraudulent ballot with the word &#8220;fraud&#8221; there also would never be a way to know if the election was affected or not, because the ballots once separated from their envelopes were untraceable.</p>
<p>And 61 judges said nothing of the sort. They didn&#8217;t look at the evidence.  Prior to the election nearly all the judges said the cases were premature.  After the election they said they were too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 10:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Barr said it. 61 judges to whom Trump brought claims of fraud said it.&lt;/i&gt;

Barr never investigated anything and the 61 judges never assessed a subtantive claim.


&lt;i&gt; Trump lost by 7 million votes because 7 million fewer citizens voted for him than for Biden.&lt;/i&gt;

After all the evidence which has emerged of irregularities, bald denial just doesn&#039;t cut it.  You need to read something other then Democratic talking point mills.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Barr said it. 61 judges to whom Trump brought claims of fraud said it.</i></p>
<p>Barr never investigated anything and the 61 judges never assessed a subtantive claim.</p>
<p><i> Trump lost by 7 million votes because 7 million fewer citizens voted for him than for Biden.</i></p>
<p>After all the evidence which has emerged of irregularities, bald denial just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  You need to read something other then Democratic talking point mills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul J		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 08:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[because there was no significant fraud.  Barr said it.  61 judges to whom Trump brought claims of fraud said it.  That Kraken lady said it (remember her defense?  folks shouldn&#039;t take things said by politicians seriously - people understand that political speech is full of fabrications and exaggerations).  Trump lost by 7 million votes because 7 million fewer citizens voted for him than for Biden.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because there was no significant fraud.  Barr said it.  61 judges to whom Trump brought claims of fraud said it.  That Kraken lady said it (remember her defense?  folks shouldn&#8217;t take things said by politicians seriously &#8211; people understand that political speech is full of fabrications and exaggerations).  Trump lost by 7 million votes because 7 million fewer citizens voted for him than for Biden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625642</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d have to go back and sift through it all, but I seem to recall Durham had at least one hard lie to the FBI to go after at the time, but he didn&#039;t and I wondered why.

The bird hand-bush utility ratio comes to mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to go back and sift through it all, but I seem to recall Durham had at least one hard lie to the FBI to go after at the time, but he didn&#8217;t and I wondered why.</p>
<p>The bird hand-bush utility ratio comes to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: miguel cervantes		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625639</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miguel cervantes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 21:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[because the machinery of fear, was put in place, honestly fauci birx and daszak belong in the agonizer, along with the crew from msnbc like feig ling, but it would be like that scene from airplane,

the only to convince a dc jury, seems to be to make sussman the culprit, not the bureau, we&#039;&#039;ll see how that works, and whether they&#039;ll just Klinesmith the whole thing, in the end,

those who were subject to ahab (I mean mueller&#039;s witchhunt, should have been reinbursed for the expenses they incurred, but there is no evidence they have been, michael caputo, george papadopoulos carter page (in the last instance, the Supreme Court said tough luck) like the 7th circuit did to Cyndi Archer in the Chisholm inquisition,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because the machinery of fear, was put in place, honestly fauci birx and daszak belong in the agonizer, along with the crew from msnbc like feig ling, but it would be like that scene from airplane,</p>
<p>the only to convince a dc jury, seems to be to make sussman the culprit, not the bureau, we&#8221;ll see how that works, and whether they&#8217;ll just Klinesmith the whole thing, in the end,</p>
<p>those who were subject to ahab (I mean mueller&#8217;s witchhunt, should have been reinbursed for the expenses they incurred, but there is no evidence they have been, michael caputo, george papadopoulos carter page (in the last instance, the Supreme Court said tough luck) like the 7th circuit did to Cyndi Archer in the Chisholm inquisition,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/05/28/why-durham-waited/#comment-2625635</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=117232#comment-2625635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The &quot;flatten the curve&quot; did indeed begin with President Trump, and I recall he tried to lift it around Easter 2020, but was not able to do it.  

Millions will die after all if lockdowns and masking and social distancing and ..... are not enforced, at least that&#039;s what &quot;we&quot; were told.

And now it seems that Xi land is screwing its own pooch in a similar fashion?  Karma.  But really sucks for Xi&#039;s masses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;flatten the curve&#8221; did indeed begin with President Trump, and I recall he tried to lift it around Easter 2020, but was not able to do it.  </p>
<p>Millions will die after all if lockdowns and masking and social distancing and &#8230;.. are not enforced, at least that&#8217;s what &#8220;we&#8221; were told.</p>
<p>And now it seems that Xi land is screwing its own pooch in a similar fashion?  Karma.  But really sucks for Xi&#8217;s masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
