<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Roundup	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:36:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Disney is &quot;G&quot; for groomer?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Disney is &#8220;G&#8221; for groomer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(3) On DeSantis and Disney: 
Right, so the House that Mickey Built is now in favor of teaching 5-8 year-olds about gay sex, via drag queen story hour no doubt. The titans of the same industry that won’t let 17 year-olds into movies rated R is now in favor of having an anatomically correct Sneezy and Grumpy show those young’ns what life’s all about? Tell me again what does that “P” stand for in movies rated PG? Maybe it should be replaced with a “T” for teacher or “G” for government? 
 
Cue John Hartford: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dry-ldF3lvU.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(3) On DeSantis and Disney:<br />
Right, so the House that Mickey Built is now in favor of teaching 5-8 year-olds about gay sex, via drag queen story hour no doubt. The titans of the same industry that won’t let 17 year-olds into movies rated R is now in favor of having an anatomically correct Sneezy and Grumpy show those young’ns what life’s all about? Tell me again what does that “P” stand for in movies rated PG? Maybe it should be replaced with a “T” for teacher or “G” for government? </p>
<p>Cue John Hartford: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dry-ldF3lvU" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dry-ldF3lvU</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Snow on Pine:

I agree, for the most part. That&#039;s why I think the Sudetenland is a good although imperfect analogy.  One of the differences is that I don&#039;t think Putin&#039;s predations extend past Eastern Europe - perhaps because he knows that Western Europe really &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; defend itself with vigor.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow on Pine:</p>
<p>I agree, for the most part. That&#8217;s why I think the Sudetenland is a good although imperfect analogy.  One of the differences is that I don&#8217;t think Putin&#8217;s predations extend past Eastern Europe &#8211; perhaps because he knows that Western Europe really <i>would</i> defend itself with vigor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Magnus		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613583</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DeSantis is strong, assertive, &#038; doesn&#039;t back down from a fight when he knows he&#039;s right.  That personality trait is very attractive to Miami&#039;s Cuban &#038; Latin America community.  They loved that about Prez Trump, &#038; DeSantis is out of the same mold.  (I live in Ft. Lauderdale &#038; work in Miami)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeSantis is strong, assertive, &amp; doesn&#8217;t back down from a fight when he knows he&#8217;s right.  That personality trait is very attractive to Miami&#8217;s Cuban &amp; Latin America community.  They loved that about Prez Trump, &amp; DeSantis is out of the same mold.  (I live in Ft. Lauderdale &amp; work in Miami)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnTyler		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613563</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 17:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JimNorCal;

Don&#039;t know how worried Norway is, but apparently worried enough to do this: 

https://www.thelocal.no/20220312/nato-launches-defence-exercise-in-norway/

Yes, it was planned prior to the Ukraine invasion, but why bother at all with this unless Norway had some concerns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JimNorCal;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t know how worried Norway is, but apparently worried enough to do this: </p>
<p><a href="https://www.thelocal.no/20220312/nato-launches-defence-exercise-in-norway/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.thelocal.no/20220312/nato-launches-defence-exercise-in-norway/</a></p>
<p>Yes, it was planned prior to the Ukraine invasion, but why bother at all with this unless Norway had some concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JimNorCal		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JimNorCal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Tyler, I&#039;m thinking that Norway is in minimal danger for a long time to come. Doing house cleaning on shelters is fine. 
If they are actually worried about hostilities I&#039;d be more impressed with a plan to arm the populace.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Tyler, I&#8217;m thinking that Norway is in minimal danger for a long time to come. Doing house cleaning on shelters is fine.<br />
If they are actually worried about hostilities I&#8217;d be more impressed with a plan to arm the populace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snow on Pine		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow on Pine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems to me that taking or not taking steps to stop Putin/Russia&#039;s current invasion of the Ukraine is one of those &quot;pay me now or pay me later&quot; situations and, in this case, that the future payment may, indeed, be a lot higher than any possible payment today. 

Thus, for instance, what will be the payment if Putin is successful in his invasion, subjugation,  and absorption of the Ukraine back into something akin to the glorious old U.S.S.R. and, then, he sets his sights on the Baltic nations, and if not stopped in the Baltics, he starts to hungrily eye and advance on Poland or Hungary?

With each of these escalations, I&#039;d imagine the cost to stop Russian aggression would grow increasingly greater than the costs today to put a stop to such aggression in the Ukraine.


Our leaders seem to have completely forgotten the lessons of WWII.

As I&#039;ve remarked here before, we do seem to be reliving--and making the same mistakes--of the later part of the 1930s, and how Hitler&#039;s aggression was not stopped in it&#039;s early stages, until it eventually had to be stopped at a much greater cost.

This pre-WWII pattern of fear, hesitancy, and lack of bold action resulting in a world-wide war that eventually involved combat on virtually every continent and in every ocean, saw fighting by more than an estimated 60 million combatants, and, as a direct result, caused the deaths, world-wide, of somewhere around an estimated 50 million people, not to mention rearranging the map and the world order.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that taking or not taking steps to stop Putin/Russia&#8217;s current invasion of the Ukraine is one of those &#8220;pay me now or pay me later&#8221; situations and, in this case, that the future payment may, indeed, be a lot higher than any possible payment today. </p>
<p>Thus, for instance, what will be the payment if Putin is successful in his invasion, subjugation,  and absorption of the Ukraine back into something akin to the glorious old U.S.S.R. and, then, he sets his sights on the Baltic nations, and if not stopped in the Baltics, he starts to hungrily eye and advance on Poland or Hungary?</p>
<p>With each of these escalations, I&#8217;d imagine the cost to stop Russian aggression would grow increasingly greater than the costs today to put a stop to such aggression in the Ukraine.</p>
<p>Our leaders seem to have completely forgotten the lessons of WWII.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve remarked here before, we do seem to be reliving&#8211;and making the same mistakes&#8211;of the later part of the 1930s, and how Hitler&#8217;s aggression was not stopped in it&#8217;s early stages, until it eventually had to be stopped at a much greater cost.</p>
<p>This pre-WWII pattern of fear, hesitancy, and lack of bold action resulting in a world-wide war that eventually involved combat on virtually every continent and in every ocean, saw fighting by more than an estimated 60 million combatants, and, as a direct result, caused the deaths, world-wide, of somewhere around an estimated 50 million people, not to mention rearranging the map and the world order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: charles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613541</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[zenman: &lt;i&gt;&quot;I take it the “age-restricted” on the video is for the images Zelenskyy showed about the effects of war in Ukraine.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I was wondering about that too. However, I suspect it is pro-Putin folks flagging videos they don&#039;t like as I have noticed a lot of other videos that are about Zelenskyy giving speeches to Western Parliaments/Congress having the same age-restricted warning.  While other videos that show more graphic images are not age-restricted.

Interestingly, and rather typical of YouTube, I have noticed a lot, and I do mean A  LOT, of videos from the &quot;Russian Ministry of Defense&quot; show up in my recommendations list. Not understanding any of the Russian language they are in, it seems to me that they are nothing more than Pro-Russian military forces propaganda.  One seems to be Russian troops handing out food and other supplies to civilians (are they really civilians in Ukraine?).  None of these propaganda videos seem to be flagged.

We can wait a few days to see if YouTube cleans this up by unflagging Zelenskyy videos. I won&#039;t hold my breathe on YouTube removing the pro-Russian propaganda videos.

The same thing happened a few years back when BLM was claiming that Dixie was a racist anthem. A lot of videos featuring the song Dixie were flag as &quot;inappropriate&quot; but were unflag after about a week or so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zenman: <i>&#8220;I take it the “age-restricted” on the video is for the images Zelenskyy showed about the effects of war in Ukraine.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I was wondering about that too. However, I suspect it is pro-Putin folks flagging videos they don&#8217;t like as I have noticed a lot of other videos that are about Zelenskyy giving speeches to Western Parliaments/Congress having the same age-restricted warning.  While other videos that show more graphic images are not age-restricted.</p>
<p>Interestingly, and rather typical of YouTube, I have noticed a lot, and I do mean A  LOT, of videos from the &#8220;Russian Ministry of Defense&#8221; show up in my recommendations list. Not understanding any of the Russian language they are in, it seems to me that they are nothing more than Pro-Russian military forces propaganda.  One seems to be Russian troops handing out food and other supplies to civilians (are they really civilians in Ukraine?).  None of these propaganda videos seem to be flagged.</p>
<p>We can wait a few days to see if YouTube cleans this up by unflagging Zelenskyy videos. I won&#8217;t hold my breathe on YouTube removing the pro-Russian propaganda videos.</p>
<p>The same thing happened a few years back when BLM was claiming that Dixie was a racist anthem. A lot of videos featuring the song Dixie were flag as &#8220;inappropriate&#8221; but were unflag after about a week or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JohnTyler		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnTyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 14:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well well; a nation that has been threatening Russia for centuries is gearing up for war with Russia, motivated by Mother Russia&#039;s DEFENSIVE / Peace Keeping military operations in Ukraine.

See here:
https://www.newsinenglish.no/2022/03/14/bomb-shelters-get-overdue-attention/

As if NATO wasn&#039;t enough of a threat to Russia, now they have to deal with this. 
Poor Mr. Putin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well well; a nation that has been threatening Russia for centuries is gearing up for war with Russia, motivated by Mother Russia&#8217;s DEFENSIVE / Peace Keeping military operations in Ukraine.</p>
<p>See here:<br />
<a href="https://www.newsinenglish.no/2022/03/14/bomb-shelters-get-overdue-attention/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.newsinenglish.no/2022/03/14/bomb-shelters-get-overdue-attention/</a></p>
<p>As if NATO wasn&#8217;t enough of a threat to Russia, now they have to deal with this.<br />
Poor Mr. Putin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyro		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2022/03/16/roundup-39/#comment-2613526</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=115532#comment-2613526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This paper should be on your RADAR if you are concerned about the COVID response and what that means for future public health policy making  - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext

John Campbell has provided a recap - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFu8UjySH28

This study constitutes a credible &#039;excess mortality&#039; estimate of 18MM from Jan 2020 - Dec 2021 internationally assessing only 6MM as attributable to COVID deaths.   In other words, twice as many ( 12MM) people had died from what most likely were repercussions of the COVID response.      

* Excess mortality is the number of deaths above that expected for a population based on prior years and factoring mortality trends observed for that population.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This paper should be on your RADAR if you are concerned about the COVID response and what that means for future public health policy making  &#8211; <a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02796-3/fulltext</a></p>
<p>John Campbell has provided a recap &#8211; <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFu8UjySH28" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFu8UjySH28</a></p>
<p>This study constitutes a credible &#8216;excess mortality&#8217; estimate of 18MM from Jan 2020 &#8211; Dec 2021 internationally assessing only 6MM as attributable to COVID deaths.   In other words, twice as many ( 12MM) people had died from what most likely were repercussions of the COVID response.      </p>
<p>* Excess mortality is the number of deaths above that expected for a population based on prior years and factoring mortality trends observed for that population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
