When the gibberish of the 60s becomes the policy ukase of today.

Boudin won 35% of the vote on the 1st round of tabulation and just over 50% on the third and final round. You had 68,000 voters for whom he was their 1st choice; 5,000 for whom he was their 2d choice; and 13,000 for whom he was their 3d choice. His sorosphere counterpart in LA defeated the incumbent, a black lady who believes in law enforcement. Their counterpart in Philly was just returned for another term. I don’t want to share a country with the sort of feckless jerk who would cast a ballot for these creatures.

I was with you until this point – when you wrote:

And where they get even closer to crossing the line into evil is that they have a mountain of evidence available every day to know that these vicious slanders are not true. They believe the worst because they want to. They live with and work with family, friends, neighbors, fellow workers, and others who vote for the other party. They know that this imputation of evil is false.

They know nothing of the sort.

First of all, most Democrats I know don’t believe everyone who votes for Republicans is evil. They believe they support and enable evil without being aware of it, and that some Republicans are evil. Secondly, for most of them their source for information about what people on the right say and feel and think is the MSM, which they do not realize is full of lies. Most of them still think they are getting unbiased news, and they are surrounded by people who think the same so why challenge that viewpoint? They “know” that a source such as Fox is full of lies, and everyone they know “knows” it too. Lastly, especially in deep blue cities, they do NOT “live with and work with family, friends, neighbors, fellow workers, and others who vote for the other party.” For most of the people I know, I am probably the only person on the right that they know. They know I’m not evil, but they certainly don’t “know’ that I’m typical in that regard.

Although, as I already said, they don’t think everyone on the right is evil, just that they are enabling evil without realizing it.

Again, Bourbons.

Exactly so. This is a fundamental move in the “otherizing” process. On offense, it discredits and dehumanizes the target, inviting mob attacks, shunning, and distracting “investigations” that force the target to waste time and credibility trying to prove a negative: “when did you stop beating your wife?”
On defense, it contrasts one’s own exposed faults with the (allegedly far worse) faults of the target. “Hey, nobody’s perfect; but my intentions are always good, and look at what a dirtbag my rival is!”
The Dems are exceptionally good at it. But I guess my saying so is just another case of “otherizing,” huh?

Why is Adam Schiff still in Congress?

Lying, stealing, nasty weasels will always be with us (see e.g. Michael Mann and Phil Jones). The key is how the others deal with the weasels. Altering documents to impugn a fellow congressman? Absolutely inexcusable. There is no way for someone to explain away how this is “opinion” or somehow not that bad. And this is not his first time with this kind of outrageous garbage. Democrats have embraced and applauded Schiff.

Evil.

(And Clinesmith is now free to practice law. Outrageous.)

This is an excellent opportunity for the Mayor to rebuild the police force with her own loyal brownshirt types.