<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;Get Back&#8221;?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Griffin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Michael Lindsay Hogg the original &#039;Let It Be&#039; director is the son of Orson Welles though apparently he didn&#039;t know until he was adult.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Lindsay Hogg the original &#8216;Let It Be&#8217; director is the son of Orson Welles though apparently he didn&#8217;t know until he was adult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Griffin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[huxley,

I think the second and third episodes are far better than the first. I know they had to tell the Twickenham story but it was so disorderly compared to the later parts.

The overall length was daunting to me as well but once you get into it goes pretty fast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huxley,</p>
<p>I think the second and third episodes are far better than the first. I know they had to tell the Twickenham story but it was so disorderly compared to the later parts.</p>
<p>The overall length was daunting to me as well but once you get into it goes pretty fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594685</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 05:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[huxley:

Two words: Bee Gees.

You knew it was coming, didn&#039;t you? :-)

The three wrote the vast majority of their 1000+ songs together - music and lyrics - and you can&#039;t tell who did what, and that&#039;s the way they wanted it.  Their songwriting process was a very similar collaboration.  They also said that it was their favorite part of the whole thing, and that only the three of them knew what they did and how they did it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huxley:</p>
<p>Two words: Bee Gees.</p>
<p>You knew it was coming, didn&#8217;t you? 🙂</p>
<p>The three wrote the vast majority of their 1000+ songs together &#8211; music and lyrics &#8211; and you can&#8217;t tell who did what, and that&#8217;s the way they wanted it.  Their songwriting process was a very similar collaboration.  They also said that it was their favorite part of the whole thing, and that only the three of them knew what they did and how they did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I started &quot;Get Back&quot; tonight. I had been put off by its length and by my disappointment with the original &quot;Let It Be&quot; film, which I saw in the theater and later on a friend&#039;s laserdisc, as a somewhat boring and unhappy experience.

&quot;Get Back&quot; is gorgeous to look at. I believe Peter Jackson used digital techniques to enhance the original footage. Much better than what I remember of the laserdisc.

I had forgotten the ambitious plan -- to create an album from scratch on camera, then perform it live -- all within two weeks. I remember thinking the &quot;Let It Be&quot; album sounded pretty thin, even slapdash, in comparison to their deeply layered albums from &quot;Revolver&quot; on.

It was weird to see them working in such a barren looking space. I was also struck anew by what handsome young men they were.

There was a great moment when John, for no particular reason, suddenly broke into the theme from &quot;The Third Man&quot; and played with more flash than I gave him credit for.

Versions of &quot;The Third Man&quot; were #3 andd #7 in the Billboard Hits of 1950. That was a different world of pop music.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started &#8220;Get Back&#8221; tonight. I had been put off by its length and by my disappointment with the original &#8220;Let It Be&#8221; film, which I saw in the theater and later on a friend&#8217;s laserdisc, as a somewhat boring and unhappy experience.</p>
<p>&#8220;Get Back&#8221; is gorgeous to look at. I believe Peter Jackson used digital techniques to enhance the original footage. Much better than what I remember of the laserdisc.</p>
<p>I had forgotten the ambitious plan &#8212; to create an album from scratch on camera, then perform it live &#8212; all within two weeks. I remember thinking the &#8220;Let It Be&#8221; album sounded pretty thin, even slapdash, in comparison to their deeply layered albums from &#8220;Revolver&#8221; on.</p>
<p>It was weird to see them working in such a barren looking space. I was also struck anew by what handsome young men they were.</p>
<p>There was a great moment when John, for no particular reason, suddenly broke into the theme from &#8220;The Third Man&#8221; and played with more flash than I gave him credit for.</p>
<p>Versions of &#8220;The Third Man&#8221; were #3 andd #7 in the Billboard Hits of 1950. That was a different world of pop music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2021 04:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;This documentary confirmed my theory on why the structures of Beatles songs were so unique, they were wrote collaboratively by two or three people together at the same time bouncing ideas to each other so basically they were three songs mixed into one. &lt;/i&gt;

Dave:

Good point. Not so much the complex structures, but the close collaboration between three remarkably talented songwriters with different sensibilities. Ringo rose to the occasion in his way too.

I can&#039;t think of any other group that achieved such integration of its members. And it showed, as you say, when the band broke up. John, Paul and George had plenty of power to write for and lead major rock groups. They did fine on their own. But their solo work never had the same fullness of the Beatles.

Related... Recently I learned the story behind Traffic&#039;s &quot;John Barleycorn Must Die&quot; album. Traffic had broken up and Steve Winwood was making a solo album. Like Paul, Winwood had talent to burn and planned to play all the parts. But he missed the camaraderie and group effort so he called in Jim Capaldi and Chris Wood for some help. 

Thus Traffic was reunited and they made what many consider the best Traffic album. Certainly, IMO.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This documentary confirmed my theory on why the structures of Beatles songs were so unique, they were wrote collaboratively by two or three people together at the same time bouncing ideas to each other so basically they were three songs mixed into one. </i></p>
<p>Dave:</p>
<p>Good point. Not so much the complex structures, but the close collaboration between three remarkably talented songwriters with different sensibilities. Ringo rose to the occasion in his way too.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of any other group that achieved such integration of its members. And it showed, as you say, when the band broke up. John, Paul and George had plenty of power to write for and lead major rock groups. They did fine on their own. But their solo work never had the same fullness of the Beatles.</p>
<p>Related&#8230; Recently I learned the story behind Traffic&#8217;s &#8220;John Barleycorn Must Die&#8221; album. Traffic had broken up and Steve Winwood was making a solo album. Like Paul, Winwood had talent to burn and planned to play all the parts. But he missed the camaraderie and group effort so he called in Jim Capaldi and Chris Wood for some help. </p>
<p>Thus Traffic was reunited and they made what many consider the best Traffic album. Certainly, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 07:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As great as bee gees’ music was before the disco era anyone feels that having a proper backup band and most importantly a good drummer would have made their earlier music that much better, the tempo was usually all wrong for example the recording of Massachusetts was played way too slow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As great as bee gees’ music was before the disco era anyone feels that having a proper backup band and most importantly a good drummer would have made their earlier music that much better, the tempo was usually all wrong for example the recording of Massachusetts was played way too slow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 05:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave:

Why do you think such complex structures were unique to the Beatles? Just to take one example, Roy Orbison was known for complex song structures that broke the boundaries of verse, chorus, repeat, before the Beatles.

&quot;&lt;a href=&quot;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Rhapsody#History_and_recording&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Bohemian Rhapsody&lt;/a&gt;&quot; actually WAS several songs grafted onto each other, although all three were by Mercury (&quot;&quot;It was basically three songs that I wanted to put out, and I just put the three together&quot;).

The Bee Gees wrote in a manner not unlike that of the Beatles, for the most part.  Usually one of them had an idea for a hook or a melodic line that was a fragment, and then together they improvised with a tape recorder running until they had a song.  Sometimes the process was very very quick.  Their song structures are sometimes conventional and sometimes quite complex.  Please &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roxboroghreport.com/2016/10/barry-gibb-in-now-with-tim-roxborogh.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;see this&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave:</p>
<p>Why do you think such complex structures were unique to the Beatles? Just to take one example, Roy Orbison was known for complex song structures that broke the boundaries of verse, chorus, repeat, before the Beatles.</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Rhapsody#History_and_recording" rel="nofollow ugc">Bohemian Rhapsody</a>&#8221; actually WAS several songs grafted onto each other, although all three were by Mercury (&#8220;&#8221;It was basically three songs that I wanted to put out, and I just put the three together&#8221;).</p>
<p>The Bee Gees wrote in a manner not unlike that of the Beatles, for the most part.  Usually one of them had an idea for a hook or a melodic line that was a fragment, and then together they improvised with a tape recorder running until they had a song.  Sometimes the process was very very quick.  Their song structures are sometimes conventional and sometimes quite complex.  Please <a href="http://www.roxboroghreport.com/2016/10/barry-gibb-in-now-with-tim-roxborogh.html" rel="nofollow ugc">see this</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Curry		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Curry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 04:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To each his own. I grew up with classical music training. I’m a Christian who adores high church liturgical music, including Gregorian chants, but I also absolutely love AC/DC. Humans are highly complex and unpredictable, especially when it comes to musical taste; we like what we like.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To each his own. I grew up with classical music training. I’m a Christian who adores high church liturgical music, including Gregorian chants, but I also absolutely love AC/DC. Humans are highly complex and unpredictable, especially when it comes to musical taste; we like what we like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 02:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would guess the composition of while my guitar gently weeps was not a collaboration because unlike other Beatles the structure of that song was uniquely uniform and followed a more conventional rock ballad structure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess the composition of while my guitar gently weeps was not a collaboration because unlike other Beatles the structure of that song was uniquely uniform and followed a more conventional rock ballad structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2021/12/11/get-back/#comment-2594383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2021 02:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=112887#comment-2594383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This documentary confirmed my theory on why the structures of Beatles songs were so unique, they were wrote collaboratively by two or three people together at the same time bouncing ideas to each other so basically they were three songs mixed into one.  People often praise shine on you crazy diamond or stairway to heaven or bohemian rhapsody for their complex structures but such complex structure was often heard in Beatles songs despite being much shorter in length, take I’ve got a feeling for example, it’s basically two songs (Paul’s soulful part woven with john’s nearly monologue part) they lost the edge if Paul and John couldn’t write together bc of the presence of yoko.  Paul probably continued this style of songwriting with wings therefore the complex structure (live and let die) that was unique with the Beatles were still present in wings compositions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This documentary confirmed my theory on why the structures of Beatles songs were so unique, they were wrote collaboratively by two or three people together at the same time bouncing ideas to each other so basically they were three songs mixed into one.  People often praise shine on you crazy diamond or stairway to heaven or bohemian rhapsody for their complex structures but such complex structure was often heard in Beatles songs despite being much shorter in length, take I’ve got a feeling for example, it’s basically two songs (Paul’s soulful part woven with john’s nearly monologue part) they lost the edge if Paul and John couldn’t write together bc of the presence of yoko.  Paul probably continued this style of songwriting with wings therefore the complex structure (live and let die) that was unique with the Beatles were still present in wings compositions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
