You have to recognize and accept that the Left has declared violent war upon us.

This is just a war of fevered imaginations. Look, just Om here the new anon.

https://news.yahoo.com/texas-soldier-shot-protester-indicted-212523210.html

You have to read a bit into the story to learn why the Soldier shot the “protester.” Or, more accurately, violent criminal.

“ACACIA CORONADO
July 1, 2021·2 min read
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — An Army soldier who shot and killed an armed protester after driving into a crowd demonstrating against police violence in the Texas capital last summer has been indicted on a murder charge, authorities said Thursday.

Sgt. Daniel Perry, who was stationed at Fort Hood, was booked and released on $300,000 bail, said Kristen Dark, a spokeswoman for the Travis County Sheriff’s Office.

Perry’s attorney, Clint Broden, has said the soldier was working for a ride-sharing company and acted in self-defense after Foster pointed a gun at him. Broden issued a statement Thursday expressing disappointment in the indictment and confidence that Perry would be acquitted….”

Marx and Lenin both wrote that that the communist revolution can’t succeed without “revolutionary terror.” Antifa/#BLM are the Marxists’ revolutionary terror squad.

So, why didn’t Evers deploy the National Guard to end the multi-day riots in Kenosha? Because he agreed with them, and wanted no one to interfere with them. Why did he announce that he’s deploying 500 Guardsmen to Kenosha now? To taint the jury. After all, Rittenhouse was only “reckless” because he showed up despite the fact the Antifa/#BLM had ordered citizens to stay out of the way. That’s Binger’s and Krause’s entire case; had Kyle obeyed the orders of the mob then he wouldn’t have shot anyone.

Grosskreutz testified under oath that Kyle didn’t shoot until he pointed his own gun at Kyle. But he went on Andersoon Cooper and said he never did that; Kyle shot him while he had his hands up. Remind you of anyone killed by a police office before a police officer shot the “gentle giant?”

Judge Schroeder didn’t sequester the jury; they go home each night. They have family. One guy who made it on the jury even admitted during voir dire that he couldn’t be impartial because, “My family isn’t impartial.”

Does anyone believe that jury, and others who admitted bias against Kyle Rittenhour, such as the woman who blurted out, “Why did he need a machine gun,” (and still was allowed on the jury) and those who may not be but may now be intimidated because Evers just told the world there will be violence if they don’t vote the right way (and it will be their fault when Antifa/#BLM riots).

This is a lynching.

Oh, BTW, if you believe these violent mobs the left supports and has unleashed on their cities don’t constitute revolutionary terror, just remember one thing. In Kenosha after the police had driven them out of the city center they then marched through residential neighborhoods. And shined flashlights into the residents’ windows, even throwing rocks through their windows, and demanded the residents come out and support them. I read that one man yelled at them many of the residents in that neighborhood would even support them. He didn’t understand what was going on. They don’t want anyone’s voluntary support. They want forced compliance.

What they want is impunity: Their guys get to do whatever they want without repercussions, and woe to anyone who dares repercuss against them.

I would say that the left would like to outlaw self-defense, except for those on the left and/or their specially protected groups.

However, they also want to weaken police protection at the same time, if that police protection falls more heavily against minority offenders – although it turns out that the victims of those offenders tend often to be members of that same minority group. The left could not care less about the fate of those victims, however.

Be sure to wait till they’re just inside the house before firing.

Even when I lived in the country my doors were always locked unless I was working right outside. I want there to be evidence of any break-in for legal and insurance purposes. I know the law here and am prepared to defend myself and my family.

“There was a question at Ace today about how to defend against a supposedly new tactic that the Left is discussing about just going into your home in numbers, unarmed, and taking stuff as a way to intimidate homeowners.”

When they show up, quickly lock your doors. They then have to break through the doors or windows to get into your home. That indicates violent intent. Nor can you know otherwise. If they do break in, shoot the first one through the door and the rest will run.

But to work you have to be willing to employ deadly force. You have to recognize and accept that the Left has declared violent war upon us.

In that situation, I favor the use of a shotgun. You’ll get two or three for the price of one.

SCOTTtheBADGER,

No, as far as the left is concerned, self-defense does not apply to everyone. Its use is now ‘situational’.

DNW,

Yes, leftists and liberals would be reaping what they’ve sown.

That said, those who effectively deny the right to self-defense voluntarily forfeit their own right to life. Whether they recognize it or not is inconsequential to the reality they’ve embraced.

In which case, executing them can in principle, violate no law. Might makes right and political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. And… we on the right have far more guns and are far more skilled in their use, than they.

Once again, those who “play” with fire sooner or later get burned.