“You see, Zuck, it’s really not that hard.
Google does it, course they do. No problem.
Are you trying to tell us that Google can do something that Facebook can’t?
Come on, Zuck, don’t make get on our bad side. Don’t make us upset.
We know you can do it. We know you really want to help us.
Come on Zuck. Help us out here.
Don’t make us do what we really, really don’t want to do it.
Don’t make us feel bad.
Come on Zuck. You’re a decent guy. We’re counting on you….”

“We disagree on many things, Congressman, but we can all agree that the Internet needs more regulation on content, and tighter controls on Hate Speech.”

Yep, it’s time to have a look at “The Daily Mail”…
(because we really WOULD PREFER to read some news…):
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10063501/Facebook-calls-internet-regulated-statement-criticizing-Haungen-low-level-employee.html

One would like to sit back and enjoy the popcorn; alas I’ve no appetite..as the stakes in this most sinister—and nauseating—of “games” are colossal….

Moreover, should one wonder if “He” has a smidgeon of a chance against “She” in this staged, sordid slugfest?

Mollie Hemingway:
“Top democratic operative Burton’s involvement helping to manage the ‘Facebook whistleblower’ public debut suggests her argument is part of a broader Democratic operation”:
https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1445186374416621572

While Glenn Greenwald adds a characteristically acute wrinkle to this theatrical piece of authoritarian overreach:
“Democrats and Media Do Not Want to Weaken Facebook, Just Commandeer its Power to Censor”
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1445506265145241608
…and:
“…[T]he real goal of Democrats and their liberal corporate media allies is not to weaken or break up Facebook and Google but to transfer their vast monopolistic power to themselves….”
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1445554039521873930
H/T for all: Mollie Hemingway twitter feed (as per usual, she’s on fire, BTW, with all kinds of important links…)

Additional note: With this particular “whistleblower” so concerned about the kids, might one wonder where she stands on CRT?

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/10/facebook-and-leftist-whistleblower-want-congress-to-censor-and-regulate-online-speech/

It’s not laudatory.

I think commenter randian nailed the agenda, though:
“Let’s talk about what this is really about: eliminating competition to the left’s stranglehold on social media. Google, Facebook, and Twitter have their algorithmic censorship down pat. Any competition would be required to implement it if Section 230 disappears because manual policing of social media sites is impossible. This enormous cost would eliminate startups in the space, and make life hell for sites like Odyssey and Rumble, who would be sued into oblivion by the left.”

It’s the usual modus operandi of the Monopolists.

Cui bono? Or is she for real (even if anti-conservative)?

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1445438141775683584
Jack Posobiec: Jen Psaki’s PR firm is representing the Facebook whistleblower

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1445456036098236418
Jack Posobiec: Frances Haugen was part of Facebook’s Civil Integrity team in 2020
That means she was part of the team that censored the Hunter Biden story

Does this production remind anybody of Christine Blassey Ford, just a little bit? Does the witness look just a little too perfect, a little too rehearsed, perhaps slightly over-coached? Is she surrounded by experienced DC professionals that she wouldn’t normally be with?

Are these little dramatic one-act pageant plays in the new Democratic playbook as a winning strategy for getting the Court of Public Opinion lined up, and then hitting the legislators? Sure looks like it to me.