https://thefederalist.com/2021/07/27/teary-capitol-police-officer-who-testified-about-january-6-previously-defended-violent-george-floyd-riots-in-kenosha/

Agree 100%

I am just amazed how easily the statement, ‘I thought I was going to get raped’ is taking seriously by the AOC and Ms. Ford’s of the world, and they suffer no consequences. It is a lie the minute it leaves their mouth.

I have a cousin in Alliance, Ohio who has hot-head tendencies. Don’t think he does crazy things anymore; just vents. He’s pretty singular in my family.

If you’re talking about women in my social circle, they perform mundane tasks satisfactorily. They perform satisfactorily when there are discrete discernible goals with robust performance metrics. They understand, for example, when they are running low on cash. They perform satisfactorily when they are doing familiar tasks, complex or simple. What they don’t do is think through something when there is emotional freight attached, or when their personal self-understanding is at stake, or when reality is not hitting them over the head. My grandmother was prudent by default; she was also an introverted and phlegmatic woman. I’ve also known women who think quite clearly when they don’t have a script. They differed in their style and sensibility, but they were all battle-axes; not rude women, but women for whom being in charge, setting goals, and organizing their environment was their default setting. I don’t know ‘plenty’ of battle-axes or ‘plenty’ of introverted and phlegmatic women.

The only conclusion: that Officer Dunn is the face of Democratic Party law enforcement. Now and in the future. (Especially given that Pelosi has sent these purported LEOs—her special forces, her personal guard—to various places around the US to “maintain law and order”??)

Which leads to another question: What gives the Democratic Party, which has been supporting and encouraging the extraordinary violence committed by BLM and antifa for over a year now, the right to investigate anything that has to do with law and order (or even just law)?

(Looks like a good day for rhetorical questions….)

Of course we think and feel. I don’t think anyone here is denying that. But the feelings of people in Congress, or the Capitol Police, on January 6th are not a guide to decisions such as those connected with evaluating January 6th in the legal sense, or in deciding who perpetrated it, or what could be done in the future to prevent it. Even in a courtroom, feelings of the victims or the victims’ family members are only allowed to be aired in the sentencing phase, for example. In a therapy situation, however, feelings are very important – although they must also be challenged by objective reality.

https://support.jstor.org/hc/en-us/articles/115004760028-How-to-register-get-free-access-to-content

At least while Covid lasts, which looks to be forever….