https://twitter.com/i/status/1410346813056380928

https://twitter.com/aaolomi/status/1410327349321732099/photo/1

Fox News contributor Leo Terrell on Tuesday slammed a Towson University professor’s claim that “standard English” is racist, saying that it’s insulting to minorities to claim that correct grammar is somehow discriminatory.

“Let me just be very clear because I find it insulting. They are asking or basically trying to present the idea that Black English or let’s call it what it is, ebonics, is being taken away from the Black community,” Terrell told “Fox & Friends.”

Terrell said that the Black community rejects Black English because it is “improper.”

“But these far-left professors are somehow claiming that teaching proper English is racist and that we should embrace ebonics, poor English, improper English. In essence, they are trying to claim that improper English is proper and I find that absolutely insulting and it calls for lower expectations of Black kids. It’s very racist in and of itself.”
…
Terrell said the professors themselves speak “proper English,” yet they apparently don’t want to hold Black students to the same standard.

“I can’t say this clearly enough. There is absolutely no systemic racism in this country,” he said, adding there is “no data” to support the liberal professors’ views in this case.

ZRT, the anti-CRT, with the same goal, power.

You’re giving too much credit to your fellow man. Self-Interest >> Altruism —> Make Joe or Karen Sixpack fearful for his/her skin. Yes, in Theory, healthy people should ‘Think of their Children’. In practice, Joe/Karen Sixpack are so far gone in degeneration that they have already delegated virtually all responsibility for their offhand afterthought offspring to the State. Maybe the next generation of Joes and Karens can operate the way you wish they would — after current generations do the unpleasant needful stuff.

Simplify, simplify, simplify!

In Practice, Theory is Bunk. The Left get this. They Do first and then dress it up in Theory and beat us over the head with both the Practice and the Theory. The Arrow of Useful Fight Back Causality goes from What Works no Matter How Crude to Demoralising an already-prostrate Enemy with Beautiful Post Hoc Theories in order to further rub their faces in the mire and inspire our fighters to carry on the fight.

Strauss and all the other Wonderfully Inscrutable Hand Wavers go on the back burner for the duration or we lose. The book to read is Machiavelli. It really is that simple.

It is evil to teach any child that they are worse, or better than another because of the color of their skin.

Period.

Would seem that the following indicator is pretty reliable:
A person, group or institution that uses the language of “anti-racism”, “civil rights”, “ethics”, “morality”, “caring” and “goodness” (and we’ll throw in the redressing of “historical wrongs” or the payment of “historical debt”) to slam and slander individuals and groups, to sow and incite antagonism, hatred and division, and to implement a policy that promotes even greater racism and societal breakdown means one thing only—that that person, group or institution is manipulating language to foment the politics of personal, social and national destruction.

There are goals. There are words. There are actions.
If there’s a consistent disconnect—or a systematic inconsistency (or constant contradiction)—between any of these three then watch out.

To put it more plainly, we’re talking about ABUSE—whether emotional, situational, institutional, physical/violent or sexual (some or all of which are related)—played out on the national level. Perpetrated by people who are masking this ABUSE by using the words cited above: “ethics”, “morality”, “goodness”, “caring”, “anti-racism” and “civil rights”….
FWIW.