Wait until we hear about the Rent Boys.

Burn. It. Down.

And interesting that Kevin McCarthy is renting from “resistance”, ex gop, but not a never Trumper, eGOP loved pollster Frank Luntz.

There seems to be a lot of establishment GOP that aided and abetted the steal, and it’s only due grass roots outcry they are doing anything.

Very good background info, thanks!

One assignment I got was to investigate non-swing state fraud. And there was a bunch of it. The reason was to make sure that Trump could not declare himself the winner via popular vote. What this article is about shows that no way Biden got 81M votes.

Below is a summary of the introduction of the paper I am writing. It may add context to why and how the great steal was allowed to happen.

RNC was under a 30 year consent decree not to get involved with local election processes. State parties were allowed to do so but because of the national decree were reluctant to get deeply involved because they could be branded as racists and obstructionist. Because of that in Democratic strongholds, loose election practices were allowed to develop like walk around money and other forms of ballot harvesting such as practiced in Milwaukee in the Somali district. All of this was known but allowed to continue with willful neglect. Hence over the years these practices were developed and honed so when mechanisms were needed for increased to ramp up the need for ballots (not votes) they were in place.

The Consent Decree ended in 2019. But RNC lost “institutional” memory on how to handle election processes challenges. Also as was made apparent, the RNC didn’t have a battleplan to pull resources together. The RNC could have mobilized state resources such as Florida or Georgia that recently conducted election process reform. The Trump Campaign didn’t work closely with RNC and vice versa. Thus the myriad dis-jointed Lone Ranger attempts were made to get the corrective action implemented. All which ultimately failed.

This year’s census shows a disparity of about 5 million votes. Hmm. A disparity where the ballot count exceeds the census’s correlative vote tally by –Presto!– the approximate Biden winning margin. First time in history. Hmm.

Virtually all of the correlations used to sense-check presidential elections have turned up with wild cards. I’m sure there is a list somewhere of these, and it would be instructive to review it, as well as a table of the actual census / ballot comparisons through the years. Everybody knows something is very fishy. Everybody knows that Democrats are historically very effective at vote-fixing.

Why is it they are not often caught, until they start doing flagrantly illegal things in open public, like the coordinated halt of vote-counting in battleground states, or taping up poster board on the windows so outsiders can’t see the count, after running out the Republican poll workers? How can the protective precinct machinery be so good at keeping these activities cloaked? The answer is obvious: The establishment Republicans and Media are enabler/facilitators I think…

Glenn Greenwald is on fire pointing this stuff out right now……

The 2016 California primary was very suspicious. Berny was drawing large crowds and Hillary was drawing flies but she managed to win it somehow. The explanation at the time was that It was the (deathly) silent majority. No one could figure it out at the time. The Berny bros suddenly figured it out in 2020.

I think that what we saw was the culmination of all the years of practice at vote stealing refined and unleashed in 2020.

There were some people who talked. There was a lady in a Pennsylvania group of perhaps a dozen or thereabouts who were being trained in fraud techniques. When she realized the scale or scope of the activities she signed an affidavit telling her story. Within a day or two there a few affidavits signed by people who had been in the room with her who denied everything she said.

Then there was the (Michigan?) postal worker who was toiling behind a stack of containers out of sight, when he overheard the postmaster talking about all the ballots he was going to backdate. He filed a complaint with the Postal Inspectors Service and they sent a investigator.

The worker recorded (audio only) the interrogation unbeknownst to the investigator and it was published by Project Veritas. I listened to about 30 min. of the 1.5 or 2 hour recording. It is quite amazing. The investigator was a master manipulator who had no intention of rectifying any such postal fraud. Part of the problem with that case was that the worker did not witness the act, only a discussion of the intent to act.

I’m not trying to tweak Titan28. I just want to emphasized that “these people” have planned for redundancies and backups upon backups.

Did you read the Time article? It indicates tremendous nationwide coordination that certainly could have included those in charge of elections.

In addition, they wouldn’t have needed so many people in order to do it, because all that would be necessary would be to identify swing states and identify large blue cities in those swing states. The latter is quite obvious – for example Atlanta in Georgia, Philadelphia in Pennsylvania. These are such blue cities that some enormous percentage of the population of the city always votes for Democrats, and there are precincts in which it really does approach 100%. The poll workers don’t have to all be crooked, either. They just have to receive the right instructions from the higher-ups about the rules for adjudication and/or signature verification, for example, and if they follow those very liberal rules there are tons more votes for Democrats.

Plus ballot harvesting, throwing out opposition observers or making them stay too far away to see, and tons of other things. It all would only have to be done in one key city in each swing state, for example. And those cities would be easy to identify ahead of time.