Comments on: A few more points about that Time report

By: Shane Willis

Shane Willis — Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:08:26 +0000

I’d recommend giving this post a read next: https://michaelkimelman.substack.com/p/sovereign-sunday-a-fugitive-black

Goes over politics and some tech, it’s a pretty quick read and very informative.

By: So, the TIME article | gregormendelblog.com

So, the TIME article | gregormendelblog.com — Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:30:56 +0000

[…] the lie to all the, “There is no significant voter fraud” crap. But there is more. Just who died and made Lefties the ultimate arbiter of Truth? Opinions are like […]

By: deadrody

deadrody — Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:57:09 +0000

And if the worst case “unfortified” election would be post-election chaos, uh, isn’t that what we had anyway ? The only tool they used to address that was the media blackout of any accusations of fraud and the claim that “in the US, the role of the media is to declare the winner”.

By: Do you know where you’re goin’ to? Do you like the things that life is showin’ you? Where are you goin’ to? Do you know? | The Universal Spectator

Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:59:09 +0000

[…] New Neo: A few more points about that Time report … Brilliant […]

By: SteveS

SteveS — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:07:05 +0000

What struck me about the Time article was that it was loaded with accusations against Trump, but zero substantiation for those accusations. The article accused him of lies, of fraud, of meddling, of threats, of all manner of things but provided nothing behind the accusations. The article was written from the perspective that these things were taken as a given; that they did not have to be demonstrated. The article was written as well-ensconced within the deep bubble of Lefty Wokethink.

By: Ray+Van+Dune

Ray+Van+Dune — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:01:39 +0000

From question posed to Sen. John Tester on NPR this morning and his responses, it is clear that the MSM snd Democrats are pushing the narrative that alleging election fraud, and using the Constitutionally-defined steps to challenge the validity of the results thereof, are now considered crimes even though both the MSM and Democrats consistently claim fraud and contest any election they lose!

The NPR hostess made reference to “The Big Lie” in a question to Tester, and he knew what she was talking about. I was momentarily confused, thinking she must be talking about NPR!

By: newmanian

newmanian — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:56:59 +0000

And now comes H.R.1.

By: Ray

Ray — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:22:40 +0000

Time’s news article made the statement that Trump’s defeat proved that democracy worked for the people. Wrap your brain around that idea. If democrats win then the US is good, if Trump wins again, then the US is a very bad country.

What if Trump won again, then democracy failed? The election was very close, and 73M voted for Trump and this fact is discounted in their analysis.

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:00:30 +0000

As Orwell has consistently warned, the way to destroy society is first to destroy any sense of meaning, credibility and reliability.
To destroy any vestige of truth. In fact, to turn it on its head.
To destroy any feeling of honesty, empathy, trust, love and replace these with hate, vindictiveness, lies and demonization (;while insisting that you are doing exactly the opposite—promoting love, truth, empathy and human rights).
To destroy the family unit.
To “burrow from within” and destroy the foundations.
To sow confusion, generate dismay and provoke violence.
To spread fear and loathing. And most of all, sheer and unquenchable hatred of the target.
Constantly.

Some posts on Democratic Party-driven, agitprop-riven disinformation, manipulation and “kompromat”…
On the election:
https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2021/02/11/clowns-hammers-scorecards-and-con-man/
On the “rehabilitation” of Hunter Biden:
https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2021/02/05/disinformation-disinformation-and-more-disinformation/

By: buddhaha

buddhaha — Thu, 11 Feb 2021 05:07:35 +0000

The Dems have always depended on the LIV – low information voter. Get a sufficient level of TV ads for the D (or against the R) to one and a D vote is almost assured.

They’ve now perfected the pursuit of the NIV- the NO information voter. Vote harvesting is independent of voters, the goal is the ballot. An actual voter is a complication. Instead, “help” is offered to the infirm and the lazy, often accompanied by remuneration, disguised as a “prize”, or “walking-around money”.

Everything can be done to excess, and universal suffrage is no exception. Voters have to care about the course of the country, and requiring effort to vote helps insure that those are the kind of voters casting ballots. Allowing effortless voting gets the “care” vote swamped by the “what’s in it for me” crew.