https://www.starlink.com/

https://www.inrupt.com/

I don’t remember which leftist Democrap was musing about the 2nd Amendment and seizing of legally owned firearms and who controls (or will control) the nuclear arsenal. It was a few years ago. Would be a bad thing since most of blue America is downwind of middle America …. unintended consequences. They think GMOs and BST were bad for food. Care for some Sr-90 or Cs-137 in your munchies?

Back in the 1950’s there was a Sr garden (at the 100-F Area) where the AEC grew crops is soil laced with Sr-90 for research of uptake to the human food chain. That was the Cold War not the Civil War.

Brian E on January 12, 2021 at 9:25 pm said:

“Then, tell the cities to go eph themselves, we “deplorables” are done growing ANY food…”- OBloodyHell

“The object is not to cut off supplies but to reduce them to the point that liberal willingness to sacrifice is ended.” – Geoffrey Britain

Exactly how are the farmers supposed to pay their bills if they’re either not growing or not selling their products?”

That is talking as if the rule of law and the sanctity of private property will somehow be respected in such a situation. Your farm would just be expropriated. And there are enough corporate farms and alien labor to feed the cities.

Geez, people. You need to read some of the history of the attitudes and activities of the Union Army in the South during the first Civil War. Forget for a moment how much you hate the rednecks who got what they deserved, and just look at the mechanics of it, and read the writings of those run of the mill Union officers who basically wanted to just kill off the Southern population, if they could not humble then to their satisfaction.

And that was in an era where some vestiges of honor and nobility still remained generally spread throughout the country.

No low level “insurgency” has a snowball’s chance in Hell of succeeding in accomplishing anything, other than provoking a no-limits “by any means necessary” response by those leftists formally wielding the levers of coercive power, and their go-along (for a plethora of reasons) hirelings. I mean, think of the German military just before WWII.

Somebody blow up just one federal building of state governor’s mansion, and all Hell would be unleashed on everyone not taking affirmative oaths of allegiance to unlimited government.

No, the left is way ahead of the right in preparing for these days, as they are the ones who have continually squeezed and provoked and then squeezed again, without any provocation, and when they were under no threat whatsoever from the right.

Politics and childbearing are probably the way out of this … though as we all know, they are coming after your children as well.

If such a thing happened, and the law and all social compact predicates are cast to the winds, then the only solution might be the unthinkable.

And the unthinkable is a response that caused so much general chaos that not even the military could successfully intervene. I mean we are talking St. Bartholomew’s Day type reactions, which are for most of us, unthinkable.

But in a world where every square inch of soil is geo-mapped, and technology can see inside your houses, escalation, or hoping to hide, is an unworkable idea.

These people are ready to nuke Middle America. You would only get one chance.

In this case, Dogman was suggesting the border wall removal might be a trigger event.

Texas and Arizona might not take kindly to the federal government removing border security that has been important to their state.

https://www.eastvalleytribune.com/arizona/arizona-sues-federal-government-for-failure-to-secure-border/article_372cf9f6-355d-11e0-9c91-001cc4c002e0.html

https://www.texasmonthly.com/news/should-texas-sue-the-federal-government-over-border-costs/

As to the feds taking punitive action against citizens in these states, once again the Supreme Court might actually find that discriminatory.

Since we’re just spitballing here, my grand vision would be to an eventual succession of one or more states and see if other states would follow. That is risky, but has a better chance of reaching a satisfactory conclusion than a low level insurgency, scattered around the country.

Thanks! I will check them out.

“The object is not to cut off supplies but to reduce them to the point that liberal willingness to sacrifice is ended.” – Geoffrey Britain

Exactly how are the farmers supposed to pay their bills if they’re either not growing or not selling their products?

Hrm, Good Luck with that. I’m down for trying it, but think it has the same chance as the nitrocellulose dog chasing the asbestos cat through Hell.

In the meantime:

Stock up on food in the red states.

Then, tell the cities to go eph themselves, we “deplorables” are done growing ANY food…

See how long people going hungry is going to set with the Feds.

Then they can XO take over the farms. OK, no problems…

Who is going to run them? Pissant shithead useless welfare children from the projects? Yeah, sure.

THAT should get them into acting as the dictatorial pieces of shit we know they are, and then we will have every reason to strike back.

Make no mistake. This is clearly a “Tree of Liberty” moment.

Coming to a “Civil Rights” leader near you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBY0CKknW_w

Just imagine if ANYONE Trump ever picked had written something about how black people DUE to melanin, were less mentally AND MORALLY capable than whites.

Would you ever hear the end of it? No, you would not.