<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SCOTUS refuses Texas lawsuit for lack of standing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Grey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2531283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Grey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2531283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One focus of protests should be &quot;NO Fraud - No Dominion machines&quot;.

I&#039;m glad it&#039;s not, quite, over - but it&#039;s down to 0.1% likely that Trump wins.

99% that there WAS widespread fraud - tho only a preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt.

Another remedy requested should be new votes in the 7 big Fraud cities.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One focus of protests should be &#8220;NO Fraud &#8211; No Dominion machines&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not, quite, over &#8211; but it&#8217;s down to 0.1% likely that Trump wins.</p>
<p>99% that there WAS widespread fraud &#8211; tho only a preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt.</p>
<p>Another remedy requested should be new votes in the 7 big Fraud cities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OBloodyHell:

I agree with your assessment of the SCOTUS BTW, and to AppleBetty there is nothing to see:

https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/michigan-dominion-report/

Dominion voting system software in MI is claimed to have intrinsic (built in) features designed to produce high rates of bad votes that would require &quot;ajudication.&quot;   Ajudication not done with oversight or election observers.  

Dominion voting system software used in GA too, anything to look at there Mr. GA Secretary of State?  Wouldn&#039;t want those senate races to require ajudication of bad votes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBloodyHell:</p>
<p>I agree with your assessment of the SCOTUS BTW, and to AppleBetty there is nothing to see:</p>
<p><a href="https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/michigan-dominion-report/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/michigan-dominion-report/</a></p>
<p>Dominion voting system software in MI is claimed to have intrinsic (built in) features designed to produce high rates of bad votes that would require &#8220;ajudication.&#8221;   Ajudication not done with oversight or election observers.  </p>
<p>Dominion voting system software used in GA too, anything to look at there Mr. GA Secretary of State?  Wouldn&#8217;t want those senate races to require ajudication of bad votes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AppleBetty		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppleBetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[om: 
Good idea, and tougher than the cold. Will do!

P.S. Can&#039;t walk away from work on the keyboard, but walk away from politics is a can do. Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>om:<br />
Good idea, and tougher than the cold. Will do!</p>
<p>P.S. Can&#8217;t walk away from work on the keyboard, but walk away from politics is a can do. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 14:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[AppleBetty:

Consider that walking away from your keyboard or running over your smart phone.  You will feel better in a week, or not, but this dire situation will still be here with us.

Major Edit is back from AWOL (or R&#038;R?)  Now busted down to Private Edit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AppleBetty:</p>
<p>Consider that walking away from your keyboard or running over your smart phone.  You will feel better in a week, or not, but this dire situation will still be here with us.</p>
<p>Major Edit is back from AWOL (or R&amp;R?)  Now busted down to Private Edit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530935</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Leslie McAdoo Gordon on why she believes (and thought all along) that the Texas argument was not as strong as it could have been---and why SCOTUS was probably correct to reject it as formulated.

And she&#039;s one of the good guys.
And she&#039;s no slouch.

And its&#039; NOT over.
https://twitter.com/McAdooGordon/status/1337546871540224001]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslie McAdoo Gordon on why she believes (and thought all along) that the Texas argument was not as strong as it could have been&#8212;and why SCOTUS was probably correct to reject it as formulated.</p>
<p>And she&#8217;s one of the good guys.<br />
And she&#8217;s no slouch.</p>
<p>And its&#8217; NOT over.<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/McAdooGordon/status/1337546871540224001" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/McAdooGordon/status/1337546871540224001</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AppleBetty		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AppleBetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OBH, please consider doing this (unless you have a medical reason not to): 

Take a shower, as you normally do, and at the end, turn the water all the way to cold and set a timer for five minutes. Do it every day for a week. 

Please suspend your disbelief, and see what you think after a week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OBH, please consider doing this (unless you have a medical reason not to): </p>
<p>Take a shower, as you normally do, and at the end, turn the water all the way to cold and set a timer for five minutes. Do it every day for a week. </p>
<p>Please suspend your disbelief, and see what you think after a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OBloodyHell		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OBloodyHell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[}}} &lt;i&gt;Everyone knows that if the Supremes ruled such that dominoes fell and Trump won, the country would be burning from coast to coast for months. A2020 would just have been a warm-up.&lt;/i&gt;

THAT is due to a small, very obnoxious, totally unrighteous minority&#039;s willingness to have a temper tantrum.

&lt;b&gt;And it would be their own cities&lt;/b&gt; they&#039;d be destroying, not everything else.

What do you imagine is going to be the response of literally 2/5ths of the American adult population getting sick and fucking tired of being cheated and dumped on?

It&#039;s going to be one &lt;b&gt;hell&lt;/b&gt; of a lot more than a slow burn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>}}} <i>Everyone knows that if the Supremes ruled such that dominoes fell and Trump won, the country would be burning from coast to coast for months. A2020 would just have been a warm-up.</i></p>
<p>THAT is due to a small, very obnoxious, totally unrighteous minority&#8217;s willingness to have a temper tantrum.</p>
<p><b>And it would be their own cities</b> they&#8217;d be destroying, not everything else.</p>
<p>What do you imagine is going to be the response of literally 2/5ths of the American adult population getting sick and fucking tired of being cheated and dumped on?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be one <b>hell</b> of a lot more than a slow burn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: OBloodyHell		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OBloodyHell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[}}} &lt;i&gt;Specifically, the use of different standards of counting in different counties violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but given that this was a clear and self-evident fact with regards to the elections in those four states, it is self-evident that the SCotUS had reason to consider this. 

The flimsy excuse that the voters of Texas had &quot;no standing&quot; is preposterous on the very surface. Every single person in this COUNTRY has a blatant vested interest in who becomes PotUS. And that includes the voters of Texas.

If there was a clearly violated rule regarding the elections in those four states, then that PRIMA FACIE affects not just the voters in those states but also the voters in every other state.

I am... greatly disappointed in the SCotUS, here. 

The people of the USA have now been abandoned by every body and every organization whose job it is to protect them against external predation (external to each individual, that is) in the nature of election fraud.

The fact that not less than 47% of the country perceives this election as &quot;likely stolen through fraud&quot; is more than amply adequate to cause the SCotUS to take very very seriously all challenges, and not to do some cheap-ass fancy two-step around the notion of  &quot;standing&quot; to dodge their INNATE REQUIREMENT to address that in the end, &lt;b&gt;particularly&lt;/b&gt; if other remedies are failing.

And every mother fucking cocksucking son of a bitch piece of shit whose VERY PURPOSE for existing in a government position is trying to claim, &quot;Iss not my yob&quot;.

Yes, it IS your MOTHER FUCKING JOB you  ambulatory humaniform container of human excreta.

And what you ARE doing is guaranteeing that the result will destroy this country. There is not a single solitary analyst who, 30y and more from now will NOT be going &quot;WTF were they thinking would happen?&quot;

I am, indeed, as mad as hell, and no, my response will not be limited to simply *yelling*  &quot;And I&#039;m not going to take it any more.&quot;

This is not going to be pretty.

This is not about Trump winning or losing. It&#039;s about allowing this country to have a third-world banana-republic grade of election, and ignoring that.

Bush-v-Gore was a clear Constitutional crisis. The noise from the election swamped the signal. So what do you do? In a banana republic, the solution is to take up arms. But that would not sit well with the American republic, with one side grabbing weapons and shooting at the other. But no, instead, we / &lt;b&gt;they&lt;/b&gt; followed legal procedures and had Gore and Bush swapping legal ripostes, until finally Gore went, &quot;...I got nothing.&quot;

Well, we have another Constitutional crisis. The election machinery  has been hijacked by a swath of charlatans, and it was done in a particularly OBVIOUS way, such that not significantly less than ONE HALF of the population considers it &quot;somewhat likely&quot; that it was stolen. And more than one third believe it &quot;very likely&quot; it was stolen.

The Constitution does not say what to do? No shit, Sherlock. The Constitution makes some basic decency presumptions which are clearly not applying. 

THIS IS WHY WE HAVE ALLOWED THE SCotUS EXACTLY THE POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW THAT IT HAS. To DECIDE what was intended by the Founders for &quot;this particular oddball case , which they had not considered or made provision for&quot;.

And they&#039;ve sat down, for fear of ticking off the Left. Well, the Left, having CREATED this situation, deserved to be ticked off. The rest of us, no, not so much. We&#039;ve seen what the left can do. Now, it appears we&#039;re going to see what the right can do... you know, the side with all the weapons, the military experience, the guerilla tactics background.

It looks as though it will be civil war, because I don&#039;t think this will stand. If the States don&#039;t pick this up and run with it, by seceding, then it&#039;s going to happen the minute Biden tries to enforce some idiotic diktat which they consider their &quot;majority&quot; to have given them a free hand to enforce, such as a mask mandate, or gun confiscation.

Be concerned. Be very very concerned. &#062;:-(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>}}} <i>Specifically, the use of different standards of counting in different counties violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.</i></p>
<p>Yes, but given that this was a clear and self-evident fact with regards to the elections in those four states, it is self-evident that the SCotUS had reason to consider this. </p>
<p>The flimsy excuse that the voters of Texas had &#8220;no standing&#8221; is preposterous on the very surface. Every single person in this COUNTRY has a blatant vested interest in who becomes PotUS. And that includes the voters of Texas.</p>
<p>If there was a clearly violated rule regarding the elections in those four states, then that PRIMA FACIE affects not just the voters in those states but also the voters in every other state.</p>
<p>I am&#8230; greatly disappointed in the SCotUS, here. </p>
<p>The people of the USA have now been abandoned by every body and every organization whose job it is to protect them against external predation (external to each individual, that is) in the nature of election fraud.</p>
<p>The fact that not less than 47% of the country perceives this election as &#8220;likely stolen through fraud&#8221; is more than amply adequate to cause the SCotUS to take very very seriously all challenges, and not to do some cheap-ass fancy two-step around the notion of  &#8220;standing&#8221; to dodge their INNATE REQUIREMENT to address that in the end, <b>particularly</b> if other remedies are failing.</p>
<p>And every mother fucking cocksucking son of a bitch piece of shit whose VERY PURPOSE for existing in a government position is trying to claim, &#8220;Iss not my yob&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yes, it IS your MOTHER FUCKING JOB you  ambulatory humaniform container of human excreta.</p>
<p>And what you ARE doing is guaranteeing that the result will destroy this country. There is not a single solitary analyst who, 30y and more from now will NOT be going &#8220;WTF were they thinking would happen?&#8221;</p>
<p>I am, indeed, as mad as hell, and no, my response will not be limited to simply *yelling*  &#8220;And I&#8217;m not going to take it any more.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not going to be pretty.</p>
<p>This is not about Trump winning or losing. It&#8217;s about allowing this country to have a third-world banana-republic grade of election, and ignoring that.</p>
<p>Bush-v-Gore was a clear Constitutional crisis. The noise from the election swamped the signal. So what do you do? In a banana republic, the solution is to take up arms. But that would not sit well with the American republic, with one side grabbing weapons and shooting at the other. But no, instead, we / <b>they</b> followed legal procedures and had Gore and Bush swapping legal ripostes, until finally Gore went, &#8220;&#8230;I got nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, we have another Constitutional crisis. The election machinery  has been hijacked by a swath of charlatans, and it was done in a particularly OBVIOUS way, such that not significantly less than ONE HALF of the population considers it &#8220;somewhat likely&#8221; that it was stolen. And more than one third believe it &#8220;very likely&#8221; it was stolen.</p>
<p>The Constitution does not say what to do? No shit, Sherlock. The Constitution makes some basic decency presumptions which are clearly not applying. </p>
<p>THIS IS WHY WE HAVE ALLOWED THE SCotUS EXACTLY THE POWER OF JUDICIAL REVIEW THAT IT HAS. To DECIDE what was intended by the Founders for &#8220;this particular oddball case , which they had not considered or made provision for&#8221;.</p>
<p>And they&#8217;ve sat down, for fear of ticking off the Left. Well, the Left, having CREATED this situation, deserved to be ticked off. The rest of us, no, not so much. We&#8217;ve seen what the left can do. Now, it appears we&#8217;re going to see what the right can do&#8230; you know, the side with all the weapons, the military experience, the guerilla tactics background.</p>
<p>It looks as though it will be civil war, because I don&#8217;t think this will stand. If the States don&#8217;t pick this up and run with it, by seceding, then it&#8217;s going to happen the minute Biden tries to enforce some idiotic diktat which they consider their &#8220;majority&#8221; to have given them a free hand to enforce, such as a mask mandate, or gun confiscation.</p>
<p>Be concerned. Be very very concerned. &gt;:-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 03:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;That maybe what the majority of liberal elites believe but to suggest that prosperity MUST always come at someone else’s expense is nonsense.&lt;/i&gt;

Geoffrey Britain: 

Agreed. However, it occurs to me that status, on the other hand, is a zero-sum game and certainly a large part of what the elites are playing for.

&lt;i&gt;If everyone is special, then no one is.&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That maybe what the majority of liberal elites believe but to suggest that prosperity MUST always come at someone else’s expense is nonsense.</i></p>
<p>Geoffrey Britain: </p>
<p>Agreed. However, it occurs to me that status, on the other hand, is a zero-sum game and certainly a large part of what the elites are playing for.</p>
<p><i>If everyone is special, then no one is.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoffrey Britain		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/12/11/scotus-refuses-texas-lawsuit-for-lack-of-standing/#comment-2530842</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoffrey Britain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=102433#comment-2530842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom Grey, 

&lt;i&gt;&quot;To me, it seems like the answer is that despite the pieties they espouse, liberal elites don’t really believe in equality, either; no affluent person does. They know their prosperity comes at someone else’s expense&quot;&lt;/i&gt; 

That maybe what the majority of liberal elites believe but to suggest that prosperity MUST always come at someone else&#039;s expense is nonsense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Grey, </p>
<p><i>&#8220;To me, it seems like the answer is that despite the pieties they espouse, liberal elites don’t really believe in equality, either; no affluent person does. They know their prosperity comes at someone else’s expense&#8221;</i> </p>
<p>That maybe what the majority of liberal elites believe but to suggest that prosperity MUST always come at someone else&#8217;s expense is nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
