“Mark” did not say, “Don’t see much that needs covering … ”
I did.
Apparently the ID line of his comment did not back out after I copied his text for a response. It probably became “invisible” at the top of the text window as I produced my response.

Don’t see much that needs covering. A little clean-up maybe.

Mark says,

DNW – I don’t mind being quoted ..

You might as well not mind, Mark. As whether you do or not, makes no difference to me.

–and I have no problem answering questions.

Well now, that’s quite the matter of opinion, isn’t it. At the very least you have mechanical or protocol problems doing it insofar as you do it. And it certainly took some doing before I finally got you to admit that if faced with a matter of personal principle in standing up for your vaunted “preferences” and your doctrine of ” My house, my rules.”, should the Black Hebrew Israelites appear in your tea room and offend you with their socially “vile” expressions you would:
– “speed dial” (is that a thing nowadays?) your attorney
– and then fold like a cheap tent on the “preferences” and “house rules” game. Even though it is ostensibly not their race, but rather their opinions you find to be vile, and you would not presumably be violating the intent of the law by ejecting them for their politics …. As you assert would freely do with ‘white ‘people like Tucker Carlson, or Ms Huckabee.

What variety of Christianity is it that you claim to adhere to anyway?

But I guess y’all can’t do the same.

Then you have guessed wrong.

Do you think the election was stolen?

It has not been yet. The popular vote has not been certified by all states, much less the electors having been convened and voted. Certainly you know that? Or do you?

In any event, given the multiple issues regarding the popular vote collection and tabulation, including ballot harvesting, mysteriously appearing ballots arriving many days after the election, assertions of vote totals exceeding eligible voters and numerous others: I am sure that you as a “conservative” would readily agree that cautious and deliberate examination of all the evidence is in order before Creepy Joe Biden P.O.S, metamorphoses into Creepy Joe Biden POTUS

Do you believe the Mueller Report and the Senate Intel Report?

Provide text in context, provide citations, be specific as to what exactly you are asking, and trust that all answers will surely come to you.

These are easy.

Lot’s of things look easy until you examine them closely. As you found out when your, “my house, my rules” , boast transformed into you dropping to your knees on command and without a peep, as soon as the critical operative distinctions which applied in the case, might have had to have been publicly defended.

” Barry Meislin on November 19, 2020 at 12:03 pm said:
Um, DNW, not sure if you’re aware of this (he mentioned it in another thread) but you’re “debating” with a Russia hoaxer.

FWIW.”

Hi Barry,

No I was not aware of it. And I guess I don’t know whether you mean that literally proximately, or ironically and at a remove as in an unwitting tool of …

I’ll take a look later this afternoon I have some work piling up at the moment, and although amusement has its place, I’m not Senile Joe’s crack head son, and I cannot delegate all the labor to the serfs at my command. One can only grind the faces of the poor so far, before they become useless; n’est-ce pas?

Speaking to him doesn’t work so just speak of him.

What a pathetic little tool. 🙂

But I guess y’all can’t do the same.

Do you think the election was stolen?
Do you believe the Mueller Report and the Senate Intel Report?

These are easy.

What a pathetic little tool.

om on November 19, 2020 at 12:21 pm said:
Mark “… I know things…” Who says he won’t assault non-people who think and say “vile” things he doesn’t like now says to DNW

What you are watching is Mark having a kind of breakdown as his facade of Christianity and conservatism has been documented and demonstrated, in his own words, for what it is: a sham.

As Mark claims he is not motivated by principle, one would think that he would not mind being quoted to that effect.

But when such an admission is highlighted, it cuts his facde off at the ground floor; and now we see him scurrying arund looking for cover.

If this went on long enough, Mark eventually would drop any references to his supposed Christianity and conservatism altogether, just as he has abandoned on point argument.

Mark is just about there now.

Look: Neo left the Democrats because of the lies. I get that.

Today you are forced to believe (or say you believe) lies to be a good “Republican.” And she wants more and more of that.

You know cruelty is wrong (if you’re a Christian)–but you can’t *say* that because, hey, The Great Man.

You know that following the law is the right thing to do–but you find yourself forced to speak against it when you’re faced with legal consequences of your actions.

I don’t know if you believe the election was stolen by massive fraud–but I assure you that your elected leaders know it was not–and they are lying to you guys out of fear of hurting The Great Man’s feelings (and, by extension, the tribe that has made him their idol).

You asked for details and you got them–you claim “I won’t be pinned down”–but I’ve answered every one of your questions.