Apologies for the late response. I’ve never been on social media and don’t have cable or watch TV, so am already not doing that. I am a big user of Amazon Prime, however. Like you, I have started shopping locally.

The comedy is not very good from your yammering the same line.

Many thanks for sharing your and your husband’s experience and confirming my suspicions. Depressing, but not surprising.

D.C. and environs–Panem on the Potomac–may be a lost cause for now, although I’m hoping the House, Senate, and SCOTUS will be able to hold the line for the next few years should Biden/Harris & Co. survive legal challenges in the swing states. Whatever happens, we should be focusing our efforts on building unity among the Red states and especially on cultivating governors like Kristi Noem. More traction there, probably, and without the swamp taint. And, of course, on building alternative media channels.

My speculation (and it’s only that) is that Trump, as a condition of non-impeachment, was all along under the RNC thumb. After the inauguration, my husband tried to volunteer to work at the WH. At the meeting for volunteers, he was told that any vocal support of Trump was forbidden on the job. They also wanted a non-disclosure agreement. He left.

If one is so inclined, there may be some or quite a bit or even quite a lot to object to or to dislike about Trump.
However, the role of the “24/7 HATE” media CANNOT be exaggerated in elevating this dislike to extreme level of hatred for him and his supporters (who are projected as being cut from the same cloth).

Thus the MSCM has been steadily, consistently generating Trump-hatred and raising to feverish, hysterical levels; while also using this strategy to protect the gangsters in the Democratic Party mafia, who likewise promote the strategy to fulfil their grandiose, often criminal, ambitions and to cover up their malevolence and crimes.

(Jus’ sayin’….)

However, I do think there was fraud, not sure how much, but it may have made a difference. I honestly don’t know. I hope we can find out.

Me too. Also not sure if this actually will have legs, but I was texted today with the directive to close your Facebook (if you have one) on 11/13, open a Parler account, not watch any of the MSM news sites and take a break from Amazon, 11/13-12/1 (mind you this includes Black Friday and Cyber Monday sale days) and instead support small businesses. I intend to do so.

Since you have posted about contributing to the legal challenge effort, here’s what I was able to find. Please read to the end for some pretty large caveats.

It appears that you can donate to the “Donald J. Trump Official Election Defense Fund” through the Donald J. Trump website at:

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/

In order to ensure that it’s a one-time contribution, be very sure to UN-CHECK the boxes authorizing weekly recurring contributions through December 14 AND an additional automatic $1,000 donation (!) on November 11 before providing your credit card information.

You can also mail a check to “Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.” in NYC; or the “Trump Make America Great Again Committee” in D.C. The mailing addresses for both are provided.

This appears to be a joint DJT-RNC initiative, and the RNC’s (probably necessary, unfortunately) involvement means that there is an odor of swamp about it. For example: the online defaults authorizing automatic recurring credit card payments are a tacky touch and may hurt people who can ill afford it. Also, be sure to read the fine print at the bottom of the online donation page about how your contribution will be allocated. Basically, it looks like the RNC is trying to make sure that it gets its cut. You may be OK with that. Personally, I’d rather donate exclusively to Trump’s legal fund or to the Republican candidates in upcoming senate races (e.g. Georgia) and leave the RNC completely out of it.

Bottom line: there may be better, more-focused ways to support Trump and his legal team in this effort. I’d be interested in hearing from others on this blog on that point.

Also, that banner is awesome! The Sunday before the election someone flew a “Trump” banner over downtown Seattle and many snowflakes were triggered.

So, if Pennsylvania is flipped, then it is only 270EV for Biden. Any more loss, he looses.

So today, I started to dig into the numbers, and as I did, I fought my confirmation bias at every step.

I realized that I, like millions of others, had been numbed into despondency by the overwhelming press, media, social media push to certify President-Elect Biden. (I put that in there so you can see how repellent it is.)

Hey guys, this thing is not only not over; it is scary for Biden. I mean really scary, and most of all, the media know it. Thus, the rush to get everyone in line with the narrative that a 78-year-old, early-dementia former V.P., who could not draw a crowd larger than a dozen, just beat D.J. in a fair election.

Process that for a moment.

Start with Pennsylvania. Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes. Pennsylvania is 20.

I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason. Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it. Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules. A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution. OK, wanna bet she does?

Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania. Biden 270.

Flip Penn plus one and President elect-by-Fraud is over.

Anyone else see that someone in the UK flew an airplane dragged banner reading “WORLD KNOWS TRUMP WON #MAGA”? (A photo appeared in The Independent. Elsewhere too)
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Evening-Standard.jpg

Before the Manchester United soccer game?