Comments on: On voter fraud

By: om

om — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:49:44 +0000

Yammer is yammering. Nothing new just another day.

Yammer, have you picked out your planet yet, maybe that one will be flat?

By: Oblio

Oblio — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:38:22 +0000

AesopFan, don’t get me wrong. I am looking forward to the litigation and the disclosure. Maybe we will win a case or two. The urban vote fraud machine needs to be exposed, for the good of the Republic.

How it was done is already becoming much clearer.

Go to the mattresses.

By: ymarsakar

ymarsakar — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:45:21 +0000

Om, a lot of humans think yeshua was yammering too. That is why they got rid of him. Old yeshua is still around of course.

It is a basic human response to the sons and daughters of god. They fight them more than the fight deep state or satans.

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:21:45 +0000

Barry’s link to Zerohedge’s reprint of Brandon Smith’s post at Alt-market is worth a read; it’s not “news” but it shores up some of the thoughts bandied about here over the last few weeks.

However, what got my attention was another article on the website — with a very direct relationship to fraud. If you don’t like the stealth edits on Wikipedia, or the “warning labels” at Twitter and Facebook, you’re really not going to like this.

https://alt-market.us/information-war-internet-archive-to-rewrite-history-with-alerts-for-sites-that-have-been-fact-checked/

According to an Archive.org blog post, you will now know if a page was pulled down or received an alert over what “fact-checkers” consider “misinformation.”

This also includes “dead” web pages that were archived. The Internet Archive has started adding fact checks and context to Wayback Machine pages to explain just why the pages were removed. If a page was part of a disinformation campaign or pulled due to a policy violation, a distinct yellow banner will explain why.

The fact checks will come from a variety of mainstream outlets, including FactCheck.org, Politifact, the Associated Press, and the Washington Post. Which absolutely in no way will be manipulated, right?

You can make your own judgments about the probity of some of the poster’s concerns, but the main point is still valid and worrisome.

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:07:02 +0000

Oblio on November 5, 2020 at 1:32 pm said:
This is like 1960 on steroids. Nixon decided not to challenge the results in Illinois, Texas, and Alabama for the good of the Republic.
Trump is no Nixon. That’s not how he rolls.
* * *
Nixon made the wrong call.
Whatever you don’t punish, you get more of.
Is the Republic any better off for his caving than it would have been if he had fought, and possibly won?
Even if he hadn’t been able to prove the fraud, he would have brought needed attention to the problem.
Instead, the snowball has been rolling down the hill now for 60 more years, and getting larger and filthier all the time.

Hindsight is 2020, of course.

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:03:56 +0000

“I could see Fox doing this, had the black guy been droning on for 5+ minutes, but to cut coverage, so soon after he started his story, reeks of biased journalism.” = aNanyMouse

Fox has totally burned whatever residual credit they had with the Right after some of their recent debacles in the debate and election coverage.
“Fair and balanced*” is now clearly revealed as the “Democrat stealth network.”

See Iowahawk’s “skin suit” metaphor.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ab3944504d21c2c25ac60adf6184368aeab192136e2a45eb7f33556a7aa9c933.png

*They actually dropped the slogan 3 years ago – shows you how much TV I watch (answer: none).
https://money.cnn.com/2017/06/14/media/fox-news-fair-and-balanced/index.html

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 07:55:06 +0000

huxley on November 5, 2020 at 12:05 pm said:
Well, I took a vacation day and now this…Help us, Obi-Barr-Durham. You are our only hope!
* * *
“I’m out of it for a little while, everyone gets delusions of grandeur!”

By: GRA

GRA — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 06:41:03 +0000

This RedState article goes over the increased Republican voters versus the decrease of Democratic voters over the past four years, and how the numbers don’t add up with the backdrop of candidate enthusiasm.

See: https://redstate.com/scotthounsell/2020/11/05/excuse-me-while-i-call-bs-n275572

By: Brian E

Brian E — Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:05:01 +0000

The media continue their narrative that “there is no evidence of massive voter fraud”, or “widespread manipulation”.
What would the media consider “massive”? When an election is decided by a very small margin, very small voter fraud can swing an election.
Those in Washington state will never forget the manipulation in King county that gave the Democrat candidate the governorship by a few votes.
A few illegal votes precinct by precinct in a Democrat county can be hidden. Spread over a few counties the results can be what we’re seeing in several states.
Add to that, the late counting of mail in ballots, gives the impression of sandbagging. Kind of the “you go first” strategy.
https://mynorthwest.com/1011269/dean-logan-california-gubernatorial-race/

By: Barry Meislin

Barry Meislin — Thu, 05 Nov 2020 22:45:20 +0000

Yes that’s right.
It seems that in addition to not marking ANY ballots for Trump they also neglected to mark votes for any candidates (e.g., for the Senate, House) EXCEPT for Biden.

Sloppy, but who knows if it will matter in the end….

Would serve ’em right if it did come to something.