‘The journalists and outlets who cover this country need to do an ENORMOUS amount of soul searching …”

So, what is it exactly, that a – by it’s own definition – soulless appetite entity inhabiting – on its own theory – a meaningless world, and driven by nothing but [that which reduces to] a will-to-power or randomly evolved preferences, should “examine”?

There is nothing there for it to examine critically; unless it has suddenly developed an otiose concern for making sure its tactical pronouncements are consistent with its actions.

Yeah … I don’t think that our use of language has quite caught up with the anthropological facts on the ground here, folks.

Of course, conservatives, with their many fond hopes, and treasured standards, and innate inhibitions, have been, and yet may be loathe to call a spade a spade, even when it proudly presents itself as such. It is too emotionally jarring.

Sometimes they, meaning conservatives, will even point to the awful past consequences of “dehumanizing” the “other”: which of course, has been the more or less default position throughout anthropoid history, except for those who attributed souls and innate and Divinely established value to that other. But of course unpleasant interpersonal consequences which might accrue from the abandonment of any given illusion, do not go on prove the truth of the illusion.

And when the other itself denies the critically structuring predicate, what stance is one supposed to assume toward that implacably desiring, yet non-negotiating other-thing, which recognizes no limits to its wants, nor boundaries to its sway, nor any point of satiety?

It, essentially declares not that it is made “in the image and likeness”; but that it is itself become a God [as gods tend to go in such an ephemeral and pointless reality] : the unconstrained Shaper and Maker of all reality, including you, insofar as you are allowed a continued place in it.

It has for years been as if conservatives have been dealing with a sci fi creature which never gives up or backs off; which you cannot reason with; which respects no limits, and has as its target you and all that you have and are

And then we actually look directly at these self-proclaimed deities: at the neotenous, fish mouthed purple haired selfie posing liberal gurls, at the smirking infantilized 28 year old hipster males in their spindle armed suit coats, at the drug addled offspring of their progressive predecessors in seizen, and at the current senilities still presiding, and we listen to their ignorant spiels, their boasts of their literal insanity, and their canting vainglory …. and we are advised to take them for a like kind? … made in the image and likeness of a God, whose churches they are intent on burnimg down?

Now, that is funny.

Conservatives don’t lose, historically, because they are too high principled; they lose because they refuse to recognize the enemy means what it says when it is at their very throats.

Fortunately, that appears to be changing. And insofar as it has, the Trump phenomenon has been a big part of it.

At some point, they are going to have to learn to cut their losses. And to some extent with internal migration, and the choice being made for them by liberal relatives who preemptorilly lock them out, this seems to be already going on. What one does though when these same come fleeing to you unchastened from the consequences of their own choices, or worse, sniffing around for signs of recusancy to report, remains to be seen.

Here’s an amazing classical guitarist who has created a whole new shot for guitar, plus his flawless technique. Paul Galbraith plays a specially designed eight-string guitar semi-upright like a cello atop a resonance box.

What counts is the music, but it’s still interesting to watch him play.

–Paul Galbraith, “Adagio Sonata K570 – Mozart | Allemande”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqS66sXf1Bo

–“Albéniz: Sevilla • Paul Galbraith Live at Soka University”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAnx00s2Cn0

It was very interesting. I found a few sites that had the radio commentary along with a video graphic of a field with a cartoon ball moving around. Even more interestingly I found quite a few YouTube live streams where men (they were all men) videod themselves watching the game live. There was no video footage from the live broadcast, so they didn’t violate NFL copyright laws, but they did play by play of what they were seeing and offered comment and opinion. I accidentally clicked on the YouTube “chat” button (I never knew that was there before) and I saw they had many “fans” who watched the game along with them and used the YouTube livestream to “talk” to one another, as if they were all on one, huge sofa watching the game together. Then I noticed some were donating money in real time in order to get the host to address and answer a question or comment they had. It seemed like maybe some of the hosts were actually making a living doing this!

Tim Poole is basically doing the same thing vis a vis current events. He picks a few news stories and does a deep dive on them, offering his opinion and folks are free to kick him a few bucks if they wish (as we all can here, on neo’s site, hint, hint…)

It’s often melodic, not derivation of Hendrix or Clapton, and I swear there’s some Bach in there, plus plenty of his famous “tapping” technique, where his strumming fingers play on the frets against his left fingers.

It’s worth a watch and a listen. I now realize he was one of the greats of rock guitar.

–Eddie Van Halen, “Eruption”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9r-NxuYszg

RIP, Eddie.

(I had better stop or neo’s software will think I’m a bot!)

Sorry I did not see your comment earlier. Hopefully you are still monitoring this thread.

Regarding “channels” there is no such thing on your laptop except for YouTube. People refer to their YouTube aggregations as “channels.” If you search “Daily Wire” on YouTube, or “The Blaze” or “PragerU” or “Candace Owens” YouTube will offer individual videos, but if you scroll a bit you should also see a circle with the person’s face, or a few initials. Clicking on those will take you to “channels.” Here is a link for Candace Owens’ YouTube channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL0u5uz7KZ9q-pe-VC8TY-w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFnJ1APJREk

You want song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHthqkXM37I

Remember that Asians are smarter those of European descent!