<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kamala wants top billing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian E		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian E]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think what Charles said in the second comment needs to be considered. Is this a conscious effort to put Harris on top for LIVs?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what Charles said in the second comment needs to be considered. Is this a conscious effort to put Harris on top for LIVs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indigo Red:

I&#039;m not sure why you&#039;re saying &quot;you are all wrong.&quot;

I actually think that is the agreement, and that the people really running the show will be others, even further left than both of them put together.  Note that I had a question mark after &quot;Freudian slip.&quot;  

Nor do I see a lot of people here arguing that it was a slip up.  It has been the contention of the vast majority of people here that Biden is a shadow figurehead, Harris will be more involved, but a group of committed leftists would be pulling all the strings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indigo Red:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why you&#8217;re saying &#8220;you are all wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>I actually think that is the agreement, and that the people really running the show will be others, even further left than both of them put together.  Note that I had a question mark after &#8220;Freudian slip.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Nor do I see a lot of people here arguing that it was a slip up.  It has been the contention of the vast majority of people here that Biden is a shadow figurehead, Harris will be more involved, but a group of committed leftists would be pulling all the strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Indigo Red		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Indigo Red]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are all wrong. Sorry.

Like Bond villains, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were telling us exactly their intentions. Hoho Harris clearly referred to &quot;Harris administration, together with Joe Biden, as President of the United States.&quot; Later, Plugs Biden spoke about the &quot;Harris-Biden administration.&quot; These were not gaffes or mistakes.

Harris was telling Democrats there is no need to fear the diminishing mental capacity of Joe Biden. She will be the real power behind the throne in league with the Democrat aristocracy. The Bidens just want the US Presidency on the family resume.

After the two year waiting period, and serving half a term, Harris can run for a full four year presidential term of her own. At the end of that, she can run for reelection for another four year term. Having been the regent president for two years, the completion president for two years, a first and second term of her own, Socialist Kamala Harris could conceivably be President of the United States for twelve years.
 
With that much time in the Oval Office, the Socialists will have had a chance to completely eliminate the United States as we have known it for 230 years. All opposition will have been eliminated or re-educated as all Socialist regimes have done everywhere. 

That is, I believe, their plan. Unless interrupted by a Donald Trump second term followed by two terms for Mike Pence. Unfortunately, either scenario plays out into civil strife or civil war for a long time. Neither side will compromise. Neither side can compromise. One side will not accept individual liberty and one side will not accept enthrallment. We have come to an impasse, a chasm too far. It&#039;s a time for choosing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are all wrong. Sorry.</p>
<p>Like Bond villains, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were telling us exactly their intentions. Hoho Harris clearly referred to &#8220;Harris administration, together with Joe Biden, as President of the United States.&#8221; Later, Plugs Biden spoke about the &#8220;Harris-Biden administration.&#8221; These were not gaffes or mistakes.</p>
<p>Harris was telling Democrats there is no need to fear the diminishing mental capacity of Joe Biden. She will be the real power behind the throne in league with the Democrat aristocracy. The Bidens just want the US Presidency on the family resume.</p>
<p>After the two year waiting period, and serving half a term, Harris can run for a full four year presidential term of her own. At the end of that, she can run for reelection for another four year term. Having been the regent president for two years, the completion president for two years, a first and second term of her own, Socialist Kamala Harris could conceivably be President of the United States for twelve years.</p>
<p>With that much time in the Oval Office, the Socialists will have had a chance to completely eliminate the United States as we have known it for 230 years. All opposition will have been eliminated or re-educated as all Socialist regimes have done everywhere. </p>
<p>That is, I believe, their plan. Unless interrupted by a Donald Trump second term followed by two terms for Mike Pence. Unfortunately, either scenario plays out into civil strife or civil war for a long time. Neither side will compromise. Neither side can compromise. One side will not accept individual liberty and one side will not accept enthrallment. We have come to an impasse, a chasm too far. It&#8217;s a time for choosing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515294</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515294</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Into the 1980s, &lt;i&gt;National Geographic&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s editorial policy was such that the framing of the stories therein was what you might expect of someone whose take-for-granteds what that of a business Republican.   The Grosvenor family ran the Society; they were patrician people quite at home with the salient features of the social and political order (though I bet they weren&#039;t too thrilled with the sort of marginal income tax rates which prevailed prior to 1981). Somebody&#039;s gotta be on top and we&#039;re doing a satisfactory job, thank you very much.  

I miss those kind of people myself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Into the 1980s, <i>National Geographic</i>&#8216;s editorial policy was such that the framing of the stories therein was what you might expect of someone whose take-for-granteds what that of a business Republican.   The Grosvenor family ran the Society; they were patrician people quite at home with the salient features of the social and political order (though I bet they weren&#8217;t too thrilled with the sort of marginal income tax rates which prevailed prior to 1981). Somebody&#8217;s gotta be on top and we&#8217;re doing a satisfactory job, thank you very much.  </p>
<p>I miss those kind of people myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sonny Wayz		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515292</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonny Wayz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Conquest&#039;s Second Law:

&quot;Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conquest&#8217;s Second Law:</p>
<p>&#8220;Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Strange Daze		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Strange Daze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Kamala wants top billing – The New Neo The fact that these two have any support at all among voters is a testament to the hard work the MSM and the Democrats have been doing for the last four years to make half of the American public feel that Trump is almost literally a demon who must be exorcised from government at all costs, even at the cost of electing these two and rewarding the hard left. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Kamala wants top billing – The New Neo The fact that these two have any support at all among voters is a testament to the hard work the MSM and the Democrats have been doing for the last four years to make half of the American public feel that Trump is almost literally a demon who must be exorcised from government at all costs, even at the cost of electing these two and rewarding the hard left. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frederick		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frederick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scientific American, National Geographic... we&#039;ve all heard Iowahawk&#039;s &quot;skin suit&quot; comment by now so I won&#039;t repeat it here, Tom said, apophatically.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientific American, National Geographic&#8230; we&#8217;ve all heard Iowahawk&#8217;s &#8220;skin suit&#8221; comment by now so I won&#8217;t repeat it here, Tom said, apophatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hitching a ride on Joe the Mule... haha.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitching a ride on Joe the Mule&#8230; haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not only Scientific American...
National Geographic also.
I joined in 1956, and stopped renewing my subscription in 2000.
It had gone too left for me, and that was when I last voted as a democrat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only Scientific American&#8230;<br />
National Geographic also.<br />
I joined in 1956, and stopped renewing my subscription in 2000.<br />
It had gone too left for me, and that was when I last voted as a democrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/09/15/kamala-wants-top-billing/#comment-2515253</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=99928#comment-2515253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Kate: Steven Hayward was the originator of the line you remembered.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/the-harris-administration.php
&quot;I’m betting the Secret Service is taking resumes of food tasters right about now.&quot;

Hayward also addressed the unScientific unAmerican endorsement, with his usual meticulous research.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/science-they-say.php
&lt;blockquote&gt;Flashback 1: Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin, writing in 2004 in the New York Review of Books: “Most scientists are, at a minimum, liberals, although it is by no means obvious why this should be so.  Despite the fact that all of the molecular biologists of my acquaintance are shareholders in or advisers to biotechnology firms, the chief political controversy in the scientific community seems to be whether it is wise to vote for Ralph Nader this time.”

Flashback 2: MIT climate scientist Kerry Emanuel, as mainstream as they come in this politicized field (Al Gore references his work, and in one of his books Emanuel refers to Sen. James Inhofe as a “scientific illiterate” and climate skeptics as les refusards), offered this warning to his field in 2010: “Scientists are most effective when they provide sound, impartial advice, but their reputation for impartiality is severely compromised by the shocking lack of political diversity among American academics, who suffer from the kind of group-think that develops in cloistered cultures. &lt;b&gt;Until this profound and well-documented intellectual homogeneity changes, scientists will be suspected of constituting a leftist think tank.”&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ten years later, his prediction is unimpeachably true.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate: Steven Hayward was the originator of the line you remembered.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/the-harris-administration.php" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/the-harris-administration.php</a><br />
&#8220;I’m betting the Secret Service is taking resumes of food tasters right about now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hayward also addressed the unScientific unAmerican endorsement, with his usual meticulous research.<br />
<a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/science-they-say.php" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/09/science-they-say.php</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Flashback 1: Harvard geneticist Richard Lewontin, writing in 2004 in the New York Review of Books: “Most scientists are, at a minimum, liberals, although it is by no means obvious why this should be so.  Despite the fact that all of the molecular biologists of my acquaintance are shareholders in or advisers to biotechnology firms, the chief political controversy in the scientific community seems to be whether it is wise to vote for Ralph Nader this time.”</p>
<p>Flashback 2: MIT climate scientist Kerry Emanuel, as mainstream as they come in this politicized field (Al Gore references his work, and in one of his books Emanuel refers to Sen. James Inhofe as a “scientific illiterate” and climate skeptics as les refusards), offered this warning to his field in 2010: “Scientists are most effective when they provide sound, impartial advice, but their reputation for impartiality is severely compromised by the shocking lack of political diversity among American academics, who suffer from the kind of group-think that develops in cloistered cultures. <b>Until this profound and well-documented intellectual homogeneity changes, scientists will be suspected of constituting a leftist think tank.”</b>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ten years later, his prediction is unimpeachably true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
