You make a good point.

I suspect that no one involved in that echo chamber—not even someone like her—is able at this point to tell, or even recognize, the truth.

So that when she says something like “coverage decisions are largely a matter of Ratings” what she really means (but can’t bring herself to say) is, “coverage decisions are based entirely on how much we trash Trump, which was fabulous for our Ratings for a long time but no longer, since our Ratings have plumeted.”.

And so, with such a “practical” epiphany to buttress her conscience, it’s now time to leave that particular sinking ship.

That this is happening at all would seem to be positive news.

Does Comcast view its MSNBC subsidiary purely as a source of profit, or does it have other interests in this network? Same question for AT&T and CNN, and for Disney and ABC.

Gosh, after his unstinting efforts to defend an ardent European Holocaust denier, on the one hand, and an equally ardent, if more “hands on”, Kampuchean genocidal maniac, on the other (all the while trashing American “interference” in the affairs of others—there does indeed appear to be a pattern to Chomskian “diversity”!), who would ever have guessed that he was capable of harboring a romantic streak (to be sure, Catalonia does have its seductive side, especially for someone who is ideologically susceptible…)…

…Well, maybe Eric Blair, who drew his own conclusions after coming to that particular fork in the road.