<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More on the time frame for Judge Sullivan&#8217;s response	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LeClerc		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeClerc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sullivan v Flynn is at the very heart of the Deep State&#039;s resistance to American democracy.

It&#039;s incumbent on Durham to make haste in turning the tables.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sullivan v Flynn is at the very heart of the Deep State&#8217;s resistance to American democracy.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s incumbent on Durham to make haste in turning the tables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T J		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 04:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Above post.
Link to Team Sullivan Petition cite
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/1

Link to first page of Petition text
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/2

Full document at Scribd
https://www.scribd.com/document/468603007/Flynn-Petition-for-Rehearing-En-Banc-by-Judge-Emmet-G-Sullivan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Above post.<br />
Link to Team Sullivan Petition cite<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/1" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/1</a></p>
<p>Link to first page of Petition text<br />
<a href="https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/2" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1281306754199011330/photo/2</a></p>
<p>Full document at Scribd<br />
<a href="https://www.scribd.com/document/468603007/Flynn-Petition-for-Rehearing-En-Banc-by-Judge-Emmet-G-Sullivan" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.scribd.com/document/468603007/Flynn-Petition-for-Rehearing-En-Banc-by-Judge-Emmet-G-Sullivan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T J		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504707</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2020 04:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504707</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[UndercoverHuber tweets:
Sullivan heard the Bat Signal, suits up and asks for en banc review (a re-hearing of the case by full DC Circuit). Calling Rao’s majority opinion “couched” is not going to go over well...
Quote Tweet

Techno Fog
@Techno_Fog
 · 8h
Flynn update:

Judge Sullivan refuses to give up - and asks the DC Circuit for a rehearing (en banc) on the dismissal of the Flynn case.

Allegation: the DC Circuit granting of mandamus &quot;threatens the orderly administration of justice.&quot;
[See petitioners exhibit, attached in original Tweet]
==========

In other words, Sullivan’s hired guns are claiming that the three member panel is obstructing justice.

It seems, depending on how the full Circuit Court regards this case — as an ordinary criminal case deserving quick and routine dispatch, or else a political test case of something more (why????) — shall decide if Robert’s SCOTUS gets another whack at abusing Gen. Flynn, Trump, and us Delorables or not.

https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1281309060642607107

One Peggy adds:
“Everyone knows everyone else, and everyone has something to hide.”

Dan Bongino]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UndercoverHuber tweets:<br />
Sullivan heard the Bat Signal, suits up and asks for en banc review (a re-hearing of the case by full DC Circuit). Calling Rao’s majority opinion “couched” is not going to go over well&#8230;<br />
Quote Tweet</p>
<p>Techno Fog<br />
@Techno_Fog<br />
 · 8h<br />
Flynn update:</p>
<p>Judge Sullivan refuses to give up &#8211; and asks the DC Circuit for a rehearing (en banc) on the dismissal of the Flynn case.</p>
<p>Allegation: the DC Circuit granting of mandamus &#8220;threatens the orderly administration of justice.&#8221;<br />
[See petitioners exhibit, attached in original Tweet]<br />
==========</p>
<p>In other words, Sullivan’s hired guns are claiming that the three member panel is obstructing justice.</p>
<p>It seems, depending on how the full Circuit Court regards this case — as an ordinary criminal case deserving quick and routine dispatch, or else a political test case of something more (why????) — shall decide if Robert’s SCOTUS gets another whack at abusing Gen. Flynn, Trump, and us Delorables or not.</p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1281309060642607107" rel="nofollow ugc">https://twitter.com/JohnWHuber/status/1281309060642607107</a></p>
<p>One Peggy adds:<br />
“Everyone knows everyone else, and everyone has something to hide.”</p>
<p>Dan Bongino</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An additional source on the Sullivan appeal for an &lt;i&gt;en banc&lt;/i&gt; review:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-sullivan-refuses-dismiss-flynn-cases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An additional source on the Sullivan appeal for an <i>en banc</i> review:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-sullivan-refuses-dismiss-flynn-cases" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-sullivan-refuses-dismiss-flynn-cases</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerry		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504633</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504633</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t have to wait any longer 
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/judge-sullivan-appeals-order-dismiss-flynn-case/?utm_source=Twitter&#038;utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have to wait any longer<br />
<a href="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/judge-sullivan-appeals-order-dismiss-flynn-case/?utm_source=Twitter&#038;utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/judge-sullivan-appeals-order-dismiss-flynn-case/?utm_source=Twitter&#038;utm_campaign=websitesharingbuttons</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art Deco: Aside from our occasional, semi-invigorating duels, I am impressed that you have done your share of research on Watergate.

However, my usual complaint remains: What are your sources?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art Deco: Aside from our occasional, semi-invigorating duels, I am impressed that you have done your share of research on Watergate.</p>
<p>However, my usual complaint remains: What are your sources?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504606</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504606</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;That’s why Dean dumped Nixon and joined the democrats and started singing like a canary. &lt;/i&gt;

Dean&#039;s discussions with Glanzer, Silbert, et al in early 1973 concerned the cover-up.  

Again, real crimes were committed and among the people who were fully aware of them was John Mitchell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>That’s why Dean dumped Nixon and joined the democrats and started singing like a canary. </i></p>
<p>Dean&#8217;s discussions with Glanzer, Silbert, et al in early 1973 concerned the cover-up.  </p>
<p>Again, real crimes were committed and among the people who were fully aware of them was John Mitchell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;No petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed as of this morning (according to the court docket). &lt;/i&gt;

So we&#039;d know if one were filed?  Or is shipwreckedcrew referring not to a a petition from Sullivan but to a request from one of the appellate judges for a vote?  Could one of the judges ask for a vote without a petition from Sullivan?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>No petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed as of this morning (according to the court docket). </i></p>
<p>So we&#8217;d know if one were filed?  Or is shipwreckedcrew referring not to a a petition from Sullivan but to a request from one of the appellate judges for a vote?  Could one of the judges ask for a vote without a petition from Sullivan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vlad - &quot;Any petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed now would be timebarred. So it’s essentially over.&quot;

Please define &quot;timebarred&quot;. Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad &#8211; &#8220;Any petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed now would be timebarred. So it’s essentially over.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please define &#8220;timebarred&#8221;. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vlad		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2020/07/08/more-on-the-time-frame-for-judge-sullivans-response/#comment-2504603</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vlad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=97944#comment-2504603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed as of this morning (according to the court docket).  Any petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed now would be timebarred.  So it&#039;s essentially over.  The mandate issues in 6 days.  Case dismissed shortly thereafter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc was filed as of this morning (according to the court docket).  Any petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc filed now would be timebarred.  So it&#8217;s essentially over.  The mandate issues in 6 days.  Case dismissed shortly thereafter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
