Comments on: Bias: the jury foreman in the Roger Stone case… https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/ A blog about political change, among other things Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:14:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: AesopFan https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480559 Sat, 15 Feb 2020 00:14:24 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480559 https://libertyunyielding.com/2020/02/14/judge-napolitano-if-stone-juror-lied-she-could-face-jail-time-and-stone-should-get-a-new-trial/

]]> By: sdferr https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480554 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 23:48:06 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480554 Techno Fog tweets: “Lawyers for Roger Stone have filed a sealed Motion for New Trial.

Based on the prior sealed motion, this has to do with controversial juror – and Russia collusion hoaxer/Trump critic – Tomeka Hart.”

https://mobile.twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1228439574252343296

See link for doc.

]]> By: sdferr https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480494 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:11:12 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480494 That has been the pattern from the beginning.

Right. This is because the extent of lawlessness in the Obama administration is well known across the entire Democrat apparat. The lawlessness was rampant, with literally thousands of participants. They all believed she would win, and hence they would escape responsibility entirely.

Oops.

And of course Trump’s win put not merely power to prosecute into his hands, but all the records of their crimes as well. They’re doomed and they know it.

How to escape? The only possibilty is political. Make enough noise about Trump’s “political” prosecutions as “lawless” revenge; tell a strong enough propaganda to persuade the polity to clamp him down, and they just might escape yet.

Hence, one after another the clown cars of a long train, every single scheme we have seen, and every scheme such as the present one and those to come. They won’t be quitting until they are behind bars, nor probably, not even then.

And may I add, Pres. Trump has understood this from prior to his inauguration and has planned accordingly. That’s why it’s taking so long to roll out Durham’s work, as well as the other prosecutors we don’t know about yet. But they’re coming.

]]> By: KyndyllG https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480492 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:51:31 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480492 F is right. They have made it clear that they will continue harassing and persecuting Trump and everyone around him for no legitimate reason, solely to try to get any form of protest or reaction to which they will fake horror and claim it’s an impeachable offense.

Thus, they also set the stage to claim that any indictment against them for the actual abuses and crimes they are committing in order to do this is also Trump “overreaching” and “abusing power”, etc.

That has been the pattern from the beginning. Someone on their side does something unethical or breaks the law; Trump calls them on it … and is the bad guy.

]]> By: F https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480487 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:17:36 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480487 It’s already been said in these comments, but I just want to underline it:

This whole Stone thing, from the FBI-agents storming his house while CNN filmed, to the 9-year sentence request, is not about Stone. It’s about trying to stir up Trump, to give the extreme leftists another opportunity to call for his impeachment. Eric Swalwell said it last night on Fox News: the Dems in Congress are looking at interference of Barr and Trump in the Stone trial, and they have not taken impeachment off the table.

All of which raises an important question: must we as a nation put up with another five years of the House repeatedly re-impeaching Trump?

]]> By: Ike https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480483 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:50:16 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480483 To: Barry Meislin

My comment was directed at the faked furor over AG Barr’s actions regarding the prosecutors’ sentencing recommendation in the Stone case, not what the previous administration’s “stay-behinds” were likely ordered to do by someone from the previous administration.

]]> By: Barry Meislin https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480479 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:34:10 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480479 But what if your “bosses” (let’s say) told you to lie in the first place?
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/02/13/buried_in_ig_report_fbi_gave_steele_highly_protected_secrets_122394.html

(Oh, there’s an official dedication here: This “question” is dedicated to all those who hold “propriety”—at least when it comes to the GOP—so close to their dear hearts….)

]]> By: Ike https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480478 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:26:40 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480478 ” misled their DOJ bosses on what their sentence recommendation was going to be” is a watered-down version of the truth, that is: “lied to their DOJ bosses…”. Guess what? Even in D.C., lying to your boss about business ought to get you fired and your lies replaced with what properly should have been done in the first place.

]]> By: Roy Nathanson https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480468 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:25:52 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480468 Ok, so the burning question in my mind is what the hell were Stone’s lawyers doing when they let this woman on his jury? Where exactly did he get his legal representation? Costco?

]]> By: AesopFan https://thenewneo.com/2020/02/13/bias-the-jury-foreman-in-the-roger-stone-case/#comment-2480465 Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:51:16 +0000 https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=93238#comment-2480465 Let’s keep some context in mind on the Democrats’ hyperventilating about rogue DOJs and rotten Presidents.

https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2020/02/13/obama-interfered-basically-declared-hillary-clinton-innocent-while-case-was-being-investigated-but-democrats-said-nothing/

In his appearance on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, President Obama told Americans not to worry, because “I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case. … Guaranteed. Full stop.” [….]

So when President Obama went on to double down on his claim last year that “I can tell that you this is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered,” he was doing, as president, exactly what he was promising not to do — interfering.

In fact, he was declaring her innocent before she has been proven guilty or not guilty.
…
Then on top of that, she was not prosecuted despite all the factual basis for charging her being there, as outlined by then-FBI Director James Comey. Comey, improperly, rendered a prosecutorial decision on the matter, after admitting that yes, indeed she did send and receive classified email and that it was likely her emails had been compromised. And this was after the meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch and the alleged conflict of interest that made Comey take over.

So please, Democrats, remove the mote from your own eye first.

]]>