<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Democrats are running the impeachment show, but now a few Republicans get a chance to speak	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2019 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Related:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-lee-zeldin-impeachment-hearings-new-development]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Related:<br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-lee-zeldin-impeachment-hearings-new-development" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.foxnews.com/media/rep-lee-zeldin-impeachment-hearings-new-development</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kai Akker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kai Akker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;How does Kellyann Conway stay married to that creep? She ought to have some misgivings about his trashy ways, even if she is willing to live with his partisanship. [AesopFan]&lt;/i&gt;

I think that marriage is history. If Kellyanne doesn&#039;t see Stefanik as a stand-in for Kellyanne on this business, she is not one-quarter as smart as she is in every other context. Kellyanne answered those jejune Wolf Blitzer questions involving George the other day, and very well -- but I looked at this fake Stefanik photo and the comments and thought, Okaaay, that&#039;s it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How does Kellyann Conway stay married to that creep? She ought to have some misgivings about his trashy ways, even if she is willing to live with his partisanship. [AesopFan]</i></p>
<p>I think that marriage is history. If Kellyanne doesn&#8217;t see Stefanik as a stand-in for Kellyanne on this business, she is not one-quarter as smart as she is in every other context. Kellyanne answered those jejune Wolf Blitzer questions involving George the other day, and very well &#8212; but I looked at this fake Stefanik photo and the comments and thought, Okaaay, that&#8217;s it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Griffin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Griffin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 20:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MBunge,

That McCarthy column was weak. I&#039;ve not been quite the fan of his that others have. After the whole collusion thing that he wrote a book about you would think he would be way more skeptical and outraged at this thing but instead he just shrugs as you say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MBunge,</p>
<p>That McCarthy column was weak. I&#8217;ve not been quite the fan of his that others have. After the whole collusion thing that he wrote a book about you would think he would be way more skeptical and outraged at this thing but instead he just shrugs as you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 19:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...Hello I love you 
Let me jump in your game....&quot;
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/democrats-omit-tim-morrison/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Hello I love you<br />
Let me jump in your game&#8230;.&#8221;<br />
<a href="https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/democrats-omit-tim-morrison/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/democrats-omit-tim-morrison/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MBunge		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MBunge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 17:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Stefanik thing reminds me of Andrew McCarthy&#039;s recent post on the impeachment hearings.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/11/breaking-down-the-fallout-from-marie-yovanovitchs-testimony/

The upshot of it is that McCarthy, who has actually been better than a great many on this stuff, not only criticizes Trump more directly and harshly than anyone else but plainly states this whole impeachment effort is about nothing more than hurting Trump&#039;s re-election chances AND THEN ESSENTIALLY SHRUGS HIS SHOULDERS AT THAT.

Using an impeachment as nothing more than a negative campaign ad is a grosser violation of established U.S. political norms than ANYTHING Donald Trump has ever done, yet McCarthy is completely undisturbed by it.

The connection to the Stefanik stuff is that stopping or correcting bad behavior sometimes requires extreme action that can be as bad or worse than the behavior itself.  Sometimes that bully tormenting you will not stop until you physically beat the snot out of him.  McCarthy and a good chunk of the conservative intellectual establishment will never do that.  No matter how bad the behavior of the Democrats and the media becomes, they will never raise that metaphorical fist and strike back and so that behavior will not only continue but get worse and worse and worse.

Mike]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stefanik thing reminds me of Andrew McCarthy&#8217;s recent post on the impeachment hearings.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/11/breaking-down-the-fallout-from-marie-yovanovitchs-testimony/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/11/breaking-down-the-fallout-from-marie-yovanovitchs-testimony/</a></p>
<p>The upshot of it is that McCarthy, who has actually been better than a great many on this stuff, not only criticizes Trump more directly and harshly than anyone else but plainly states this whole impeachment effort is about nothing more than hurting Trump&#8217;s re-election chances AND THEN ESSENTIALLY SHRUGS HIS SHOULDERS AT THAT.</p>
<p>Using an impeachment as nothing more than a negative campaign ad is a grosser violation of established U.S. political norms than ANYTHING Donald Trump has ever done, yet McCarthy is completely undisturbed by it.</p>
<p>The connection to the Stefanik stuff is that stopping or correcting bad behavior sometimes requires extreme action that can be as bad or worse than the behavior itself.  Sometimes that bully tormenting you will not stop until you physically beat the snot out of him.  McCarthy and a good chunk of the conservative intellectual establishment will never do that.  No matter how bad the behavior of the Democrats and the media becomes, they will never raise that metaphorical fist and strike back and so that behavior will not only continue but get worse and worse and worse.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 14:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The party of personal destruction doesn&#039;t skip a beat:
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/please-support-rep-stefanik.php
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/she-must-have-hit-a-nerve.php
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elise-stefanik-schiff-antagonist-fiery-impeachment-hearings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The party of personal destruction doesn&#8217;t skip a beat:<br />
<a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/please-support-rep-stefanik.php" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/please-support-rep-stefanik.php</a><br />
<a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/she-must-have-hit-a-nerve.php" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/11/she-must-have-hit-a-nerve.php</a><br />
<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elise-stefanik-schiff-antagonist-fiery-impeachment-hearings" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elise-stefanik-schiff-antagonist-fiery-impeachment-hearings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JHCorcoran		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465712</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHCorcoran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is time to laugh at Mr. Schiff;

https://youtu.be/1PORzc4wIXk

AG Barr is correct about his comments about the left and the treatment of Trump via the Democrat establishment.  Barr is the best AG that the US has had in long time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time to laugh at Mr. Schiff;</p>
<p><a href="https://youtu.be/1PORzc4wIXk" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/1PORzc4wIXk</a></p>
<p>AG Barr is correct about his comments about the left and the treatment of Trump via the Democrat establishment.  Barr is the best AG that the US has had in long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom Grey on November 16, 2019 at 4:43 pm said:
...
Yet another Flight 93 election coming up.
* * *
Or worse.
https://www.thenewneo.com/2019/11/11/remember-2016-the-flight-93-election-well-the-2020-election-figures-to-be/

&lt;blockquote&gt; …the Nineteen Eighty-Four election, according to Victor Davis Hanson:
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Grey on November 16, 2019 at 4:43 pm said:<br />
&#8230;<br />
Yet another Flight 93 election coming up.<br />
* * *<br />
Or worse.<br />
<a href="https://www.thenewneo.com/2019/11/11/remember-2016-the-flight-93-election-well-the-2020-election-figures-to-be/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.thenewneo.com/2019/11/11/remember-2016-the-flight-93-election-well-the-2020-election-figures-to-be/</a></p>
<blockquote><p> …the Nineteen Eighty-Four election, according to Victor Davis Hanson:
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465685</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 05:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From the other LI post sdferr linked:
&lt;blockquote&gt; 
Stefanik: “My opponent Taxin’ Tedra can have your sick mysogynist support.”

Rather than apologize for his crude attack on Stefanik, Conway doubled down, countering “Well, now you have [been called ‘trash’].”

He then, without a hint of irony, calls President Trump “psychologically unstable” for . . . wait for it . . . name-calling.

Conway: &quot;Well, now you have. You tell lies to defend a psychologically unstable man who calls people “scum” for telling the truth about him. &quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Stefanik seems to be taking note of the success of Trump&#039;s nicknaming.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the other LI post sdferr linked:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Stefanik: “My opponent Taxin’ Tedra can have your sick mysogynist support.”</p>
<p>Rather than apologize for his crude attack on Stefanik, Conway doubled down, countering “Well, now you have [been called ‘trash’].”</p>
<p>He then, without a hint of irony, calls President Trump “psychologically unstable” for . . . wait for it . . . name-calling.</p>
<p>Conway: &#8220;Well, now you have. You tell lies to defend a psychologically unstable man who calls people “scum” for telling the truth about him. &#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Stefanik seems to be taking note of the success of Trump&#8217;s nicknaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/11/16/the-democrats-are-running-the-impeachment-show-but-now-a-few-republicans-get-a-chance-to-speak/#comment-2465684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=91203#comment-2465684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Commenters at sdferr&#039;s first link are predominantly leftist; the consensus was more or less &quot;George took down the tweet when he found out it was fake, but after her sham performance yesterday, most people would believe she&#039;s the kind of person that would do that&quot; so he was kinda-sorta justified in posting it.

A more rational commenter pointed out that an honest person would verify the picture &lt;em&gt;before &lt;/em&gt;posting it, not just take it down after the damage was out on the internet forever.

PS How does Kellyann Conway stay married to that creep? She ought to have some misgivings about his trashy ways, even if she is willing to live with his partisanship.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenters at sdferr&#8217;s first link are predominantly leftist; the consensus was more or less &#8220;George took down the tweet when he found out it was fake, but after her sham performance yesterday, most people would believe she&#8217;s the kind of person that would do that&#8221; so he was kinda-sorta justified in posting it.</p>
<p>A more rational commenter pointed out that an honest person would verify the picture <em>before </em>posting it, not just take it down after the damage was out on the internet forever.</p>
<p>PS How does Kellyann Conway stay married to that creep? She ought to have some misgivings about his trashy ways, even if she is willing to live with his partisanship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
