You never quite know if you’re reading facts or factoids. If those are facts, it’s a smoking gun. Barr needs to get to the bottom of it.

Oh. CBS didn’t fire the leaker, who still works at ABC. How ’bout that?

“Two sources with knowledge of the situation tell me that ABC News executives know who the former employee is but don’t know if that person leaked the footage to Project Veritas, the right-wing activist group, or if they shared it with others who leaked the footage,” Ali wrote. “What ABC News executives do know is that the former employee is now working at CBS News.”

Ali added that ABC executives informed CBS that the potential leaker was now working at “The Tiffany Network.”

The report sparked widespread outrage that ABC was going after the leaker and attempting to get them fired from CBS, while downplaying the fact that the network killed the Epstein story in the first place.

Much more recently, though, we have had accused pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed “suicide,” which the MSM covered, the current NYC Medical Examiner’s verdict of “suicide” was portrayed as settling the matter and, then, this story quickly disappeared from the MSM.

Epstein, you might remember, had many dozens of very rich, famous, and connected people, including Bill Clinton—fly, sometimes fly numerous times—on Epstein’s private airplane to his supposed “pedophile island,” and/or visit/hang out with/stay with him in his New York apartment—like England’s Prince Andrew.

There are rumors that Epstein had his premises wired for video and sound and, thus, supposedly had a lot of bad stuff on a lot of famous people; perhaps the source of his power, and years of immunity from public exposure and prosecution.

Naturally, if this were true, there would be quite a few powerful people who had all the reason in the world to want Epstein dead and silenced.

This last week famous forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden—the former New York City Medical Examiner who, at the request of Epstein’s brother, observed the current NYC Medical examiner’s autopsy of Jeffrey Epstein, and says that he has done or supervised some 20,000 autopsies—many hundreds of them strangulations—has given his opinion on FOX that, given what is now known—particularly the fact that not one but three different bones in Epstein’s neck were broken, the fact that the blood vessels in Epstein’s eyes were broken, plus the low height of the bedpost that the sheet was tied on, which Baden says the mechanics of which makes Epstein being able to strangle himself very unlikely—these facts indicate this “suicide” was more likely a “homicide.” Dr Baden quoted as saying that, in 50 years of doing autopsies, he has never seen this combination of bones being broken in a strangulation that was a suicide. *

In addition to this, you must also admit that the circumstances surrounding this supposed “suicide” are very, very fishy, and contain far too many “coincidences,” all of which would have made it much easier for someone to strangle Epstein unobserved.

The first thing to note is that, according to reports, there has been only one other supposed “suicide” (this one also perhaps doubtful, and of a mobster) in this facility over the course of the last 40 years.

Then, there were the vague reports in the MSM—some which said that Epstein had suffered “injuries to his neck area” as the result of Epstein trying to “hurt himself,” while other reports said that, instead, Epstein had been roughed up by his hulking ex-cop cellmate, who was in jail charged with killing four people.

Following these injuries, Epstein was put on suicide watch—which meant, among other things, reportedly replacing his regular cotton? bed sheets, which Epstein could conceivably use to harm himself, with some sort of much weaker paper mache like bed sheets—sheets presumably not strong enough to be used to fashion something which Epstein could use to strangle himself.

A few days later, Epstein was taken off suicide watch and, presumably, back came the bedsheets which could be used in a strangulation.

Next, Epstein’s hulking cellmate was transferred out of his cell, leaving Epstein all alone.

Then, the night that Epstein supposedly strangled himself, his guards—who were supposed to check his cell every 30 minutes (and if Epstein had still been on suicide watch, every 15 minutes in addition) unaccountably fell asleep for a few hours, so that there was a three hour or so period where Epstein was not checked on, during which the strangulation occurred.

In addition, at least two cameras that were supposed to monitor the cell Epstein was in suffered a mysterious “malfunction,” and reportedly didn’t record anything during the hours when the strangulation apparently occurred.

Dr Baden also pointed out that the NYC Medical Examiner’s office has not yet released any DNA evidence from the sheets, nor reported on whether there was any DNA evidence recovered from underneath Epstein’s fingernails.

I don’t know how this whole thing could be anymore of a set-up than it appears to be.

* See https://www.foxnews.com/us/forensic-pathologist-jeffrey-epstein-homicide-suicide

I believe that.

Broaddrick was raped / had unwanted sex with Clinton. She had sex. I think she did not clearly say “no”, and possibly wanted good sex — but she didn’t want her lip to be bitten.

Date, time, place more clearly remembered than anything about Kavanaugh, or even about Trump. The #MeToo feminists need to support Broaddrick or else they’re admitting it’s a selective, partisan outrage. Some feminists are on board with this.

Warren supporting women will likely be calling for more against Bill Clinton, as a way of keeping Hillary out, and even out of the limited press time.

If even a professional observer of politics, of the GOP persuasion, still accepts that kind of discredited narrative, what hope is there for people like my LIV friend?

See how easy that is? No need to qualify or otherwise make your support appear more palatable to others.

Trump has endured the unthinkable as a presidential candidate, a presidential elect, and now as president.

These support qualifiers are representative of those expressing them and not of Trump.

It’s ironic free thinkers are now heretics.

But seriously… Nothing will come of it. If this was a serious threat, the Clintons would have buried the evidence — and witnesses — long ago. Better would be to put him on trial for his behavior on Epstein’s plane, in Epstein’s apartment, and on Epstein’s private island. There must be witnesses (e.g. staff).

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/11/05/james-okeefe-project-veritas-epstein-n2555911

UPDATE: ABC News responded to Project Veritas’ story by denying that the network killed the alleged Epstein story. The network claims Robach’s original reporting did not meet editorial standards and could not be verified. Anchor Amy Robach claims this clip was simply due to a “private moment of frustration.”

ORIGINAL: Project Veritas’ James O’Keefe released another tape that was leaked to the watchdog group from a whistleblower inside a major network newsroom. On Tuesday, the investigative journalism outlet exposed ABC News for allegedly spiking a story implicating heinous pervert and now-dead child molester Jeffrey Epstein. In the video seen at the bottom of this post, O’Keefe’s tape reveals ABC News 20/20 co-anchor and Good Morning America guest anchor Amy Robach lamenting that network higher-ups killed a story in 2016 she had implicating Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, former President Bill Clinton, and members of the British Royal Family regarding Epstein’s sex trafficking. More shockingly, Robach admits that she believes Epstein was killed because of how much blackmail he had on so many various people.

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=3lfwkTsJGYA

Gaslighting: Manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity.