Canek Sanchez Guevara was the eldest grandson of Ernesto Che Guevara. Hildita Guevara was his mother and his father was Alberto Sanchez, a Mexican leftist. He was born in Havana on the 22nd May 1974. Canek means Black Snake in Yucatec Maya.

As a child he lived with his parents in Milan and Barcelona, attending a Spanish-Catalan school in the latter city. He then lived in Mexico, returning to Cuba in 1986. He quickly became disgusted with the Castro regime and the way it persecuted writers, artists and others. He rejected the role that the regime were preparing for him as a high ranking military officer. He started dressing like a punk. He helped form a heavy metal band called Metalizer. One evening the secret police broke up a forbidden gig of the band, lobbing tear gas grenades into the crowd and subjecting him to a humiliating body search.

He began to offer vocal criticisms of the regime which obliged him to leave Cuba at the age of 22 in 1996. He returned to Mexico where several members of his family lived.

The article is a puff piece. It doesn’t pretend to make an analysis of Che’s life- such as Che the Executioner. Go to Humberto Fontova, Jorge Castañeda, or Jon Lee Anderson for that.

In Exposing the Real, Che Guevara, Fontova quotes Che from the London Daily Worker in 1962:

“We will march the path of victory even if it costs millions of atomic victims. . . . We must keep our hatred alive and fan it to paroxysm.”

Interesting that neither Anderson nor Castañeda have that quote.

Lucifer was a Roman bishop. If you mean the entity isaiah was talking about, he/they prefer the name Heyl-El, in the original Hebrew, meaning Howling Star (not Morning Star).

The angels and archangels of god are referred to with the post attachment -El.

A lot of the bifurcation and division by 3s did happen, although it was more than just one entity involved.

Meanwhile, Smithsonian Magazine is running a fan letter to Che Guevara. Go figure.

******

“Roaring Through Cuba With Che Guevara’s Son”

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/roaring-through-cuba-with-che-guevara-son-180973314/

<blockquote SMITHSONIAN MAGAZINE | November 2019

For several days, Ernesto Guevara, Che’s son, had been leading a group of eight on a motorcycle tour around Cuba. The escapade was filled with the island’s usual mild chaos and misadventures, which Ernesto had tackled with dry humor. “Some of the potholes out here have names,” he said of the decaying country roads. “They’ve been here for so long people are fond of them. They’re like pets.” But he grew quiet as we began to explore Santa Clara, the provincial city that encapsulates Che’s short, operatic life and helped turn him into one of the most recognizable—and yet, little-known—figures of the modern era.

[Snip]

Not a short article. Photos. Haven’t read it. Is it truthful? If so, is it interesting? Dunno. But thanks, Amadeus, for the reference.

. . .

Aesop, the cartoon is priceless! Thanks!

Just a note — it’s not in the Breitbart article. Click on the Tweet halfway through the article to see the funny. NOT to be missed! 😆

They will offer no quarter, no compromise. Think on that, because it is not how we products of American democracy and give-and-take politics tend to view things and we need to recognize reality for what it is–like it or not..
* * *
As I was scrolling back through Neo’s posts that I missed while off the grid for a week, I had occasion to reference this article on David Horowitz, which cited his opinion of the difference in viewpoint of the Left and Right.

DH is kind of a one-man-band for the Left-Right contest. The article also shows that many of the political and social events of current interest are NOT NEW.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/11/david-horowitz-journey-left-right/

The Life and Work of David Horowitz
By JAMIE GLAZOV
November 10, 2015 5:00 PM

Conservatives generally, and Republicans in particular, either fail to understand that there is a political war taking place, or disapprove of the fact that there is. Conservatives approach politics as a series of management issues, and hope to impose limits on what government may do. Their paradigm is based on individualism, compromise, and partial solutions. This puts conservatives at a distinct disadvantage in political combat with the Left, whose paradigm of oppression and liberation inspires missionary zeal and is perfectly suited to aggressive tactics and no-holds-barred combat. Horowitz’s political strategy is to turn the tables on the Left, framing “liberals” and “progressives” as the actual oppressors of minorities and the poor.
…
In 2014, Horowitz resumed his strategic lessons for Republicans and conservatives in Take No Prisoners: The Battle Plan for Defeating the Left, which is a summary statement of his 20 years of thinking about political warfare. According to Horowitz, conservatives fail to employ a political language that speaks to voters’ emotions, and fail to highlight the moral imperative of opposing policies that are destructive to the poor and the vulnerable, and ultimately to all Americans. Progressives view themselves as social redeemers, as missionaries seeking to transform the world, which inspires their will to win. Conservatives are pragmatists whose goals are specific, practical, and modest by comparison. But it is only by embracing an inspiring mission as defenders of freedom and champions of the victims of progressive policies that conservatives can confront the fire of the Left with a fire of their own.

RTWT.
Contains what looks like a full bibliography & ample biographical details.

October 28, 2019 (NewsBusters) — Twitter blew up for a minute yesterday over The Washington Post using this headline for an obituary of the founder of ISIS: “Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, austere religious scholar at helm of Islamic State, dies at 48.” It inspired a satirical hashtag called #WaPoDeathNotices, including this 9/11 gibe by NB editor Curtis Houck: “Mohamed Atta, skilled aviator and leader of men, dies at 33. ”

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/28/judge-reverses-ruling-allows-covington-catholics-nick-sandmann-to-sue-washington-post-for-defamation/

MARGARET BRENNAN: Was President Obama informed of the death of al-Baghdadi by the administration? Did you know before the news today?

RICE: No, there’s no reason why I should know. There is a tradition of common courtesy of presidents informing their predecessors of things of significance like this. Since the White House seemingly didn’t feel it necessary to inform the leadership of the intelligence committees on a bipartisan basis, I’m quite confident that they didn’t do the normal protocol with respect to predecessors either.

Well, Obama always told us that he only learned about important events in his own administration from the news; why should Trump upset him by changing the procedure?