<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trump&#8217;s style: today&#8217;s example	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie near Chicago		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2458025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie near Chicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 20:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2458025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aesop,

Love your taste in feisty Grrrl Pundits!  :&#062;))

.......
ETA:  Wow, look at that!  EDIT&#039;s come by!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesop,</p>
<p>Love your taste in feisty Grrrl Pundits!  :&gt;))</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
ETA:  Wow, look at that!  EDIT&#8217;s come by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I dunno — you missed FDR’s couple of affairs, and Eisenhower’s.&lt;/i&gt;

Eisenhower&#039;s &#039;affair&#039; was a posthumous claim made by his secretary, and if I&#039;m not mistaken, she never claimed it had a sexual component.  Merle Miller in &lt;i&gt;Plain Speaking&lt;/i&gt; put into Harry Truman&#039;s mouth a claim that Eisenhower had asked his approval to divorce Mamie which Truman refused to grant, but I  don&#039;t think there&#039;s any parallel documentation of any such request and Miller&#039;s not the most trustworthy witness.  Mamie&#039;s biographer doesn&#039;t declare one way or another, just reports that Mamie didn&#039;t care for Kay Summersby and didn&#039;t like the amount of time she spent around Mamie&#039;s husband.  John Eisenhower said publicly and explicitly that the family pondered Summersby&#039;s claim and decided it was self-aggrandizing fabulism.  N.B. John Eisenhower was employed on his father&#039;s staff.

FDR had multiple mistresses and one of his daughters was implicated in re-introducing one of them into his circle at the end of his life, to her mother&#039;s consternation.  The Roosevelts were horrible at family life.  Their five children had 19 marriages between them.  I think only one of them was married fewer than 3x, and they were all divorced at least once.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I dunno — you missed FDR’s couple of affairs, and Eisenhower’s.</i></p>
<p>Eisenhower&#8217;s &#8216;affair&#8217; was a posthumous claim made by his secretary, and if I&#8217;m not mistaken, she never claimed it had a sexual component.  Merle Miller in <i>Plain Speaking</i> put into Harry Truman&#8217;s mouth a claim that Eisenhower had asked his approval to divorce Mamie which Truman refused to grant, but I  don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any parallel documentation of any such request and Miller&#8217;s not the most trustworthy witness.  Mamie&#8217;s biographer doesn&#8217;t declare one way or another, just reports that Mamie didn&#8217;t care for Kay Summersby and didn&#8217;t like the amount of time she spent around Mamie&#8217;s husband.  John Eisenhower said publicly and explicitly that the family pondered Summersby&#8217;s claim and decided it was self-aggrandizing fabulism.  N.B. John Eisenhower was employed on his father&#8217;s staff.</p>
<p>FDR had multiple mistresses and one of his daughters was implicated in re-introducing one of them into his circle at the end of his life, to her mother&#8217;s consternation.  The Roosevelts were horrible at family life.  Their five children had 19 marriages between them.  I think only one of them was married fewer than 3x, and they were all divorced at least once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JHCorcoran		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457990</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JHCorcoran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Liberty Wolf

Well said!  The democratic congress does not govern. They preen and pout like a bunch of teenagers and the media is worst.  They make me ill and they are a waist of tour tax payer’s money.  It is also important to point out that without California, Trump won the popular vote.  We are not the United States of California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberty Wolf</p>
<p>Well said!  The democratic congress does not govern. They preen and pout like a bunch of teenagers and the media is worst.  They make me ill and they are a waist of tour tax payer’s money.  It is also important to point out that without California, Trump won the popular vote.  We are not the United States of California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shadow		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457982</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shadow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 09:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The simple fact is that if Trump was vaguely presidential he wouldn&#039;t be President&quot;

- Dennis Miller]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The simple fact is that if Trump was vaguely presidential he wouldn&#8217;t be President&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Dennis Miller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 04:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sergey on October 3, 2019 at 5:36 am said:
Trump’s style is just the preference of the street talk to the lawyer’s talk, which is an advantage in persuading voters. Many politicians tried fake this, but almost always they, indeed, sound fake. 
* * *
Good summary of the way a lot of people have described the attraction (or, at least, non-objectionable-ness) of Trump&#039;s style.

One of the things that helped convince me this was an &quot;okay&quot; style was a post by Ammo Grrrl at PowerLine, after the Hollywood tapes were revealed (I still can&#039;t imagine who hung on to them that long, or why, and don&#039;t remember the details).
My own friends and family don&#039;t really use street talk of that kind; if my Dad said &quot;damn&quot; twice in my hearing, that was two more than I actually remember, and I had to check the dictionary for a couple of words while I was in college.

So, I relied on people with a wider experience of the world.

I can&#039;t find that post, of course, but for those not yet acquainted with Ammo Grrrll, here is another good one
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/03/thoughts-from-the-ammo-line-212.php]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sergey on October 3, 2019 at 5:36 am said:<br />
Trump’s style is just the preference of the street talk to the lawyer’s talk, which is an advantage in persuading voters. Many politicians tried fake this, but almost always they, indeed, sound fake.<br />
* * *<br />
Good summary of the way a lot of people have described the attraction (or, at least, non-objectionable-ness) of Trump&#8217;s style.</p>
<p>One of the things that helped convince me this was an &#8220;okay&#8221; style was a post by Ammo Grrrl at PowerLine, after the Hollywood tapes were revealed (I still can&#8217;t imagine who hung on to them that long, or why, and don&#8217;t remember the details).<br />
My own friends and family don&#8217;t really use street talk of that kind; if my Dad said &#8220;damn&#8221; twice in my hearing, that was two more than I actually remember, and I had to check the dictionary for a couple of words while I was in college.</p>
<p>So, I relied on people with a wider experience of the world.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t find that post, of course, but for those not yet acquainted with Ammo Grrrll, here is another good one<br />
<a href="https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/03/thoughts-from-the-ammo-line-212.php" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2018/03/thoughts-from-the-ammo-line-212.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: charles		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[charles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 00:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, Trump&#039;s language is course at times; but, nowadays that isn&#039;t all that out of bounds like it used to be.

At least he didn&#039;t call voters a basket of deplorables, or give the middle finger to his opponent like the two most recent Democratic Presidential candidates did.

So, yea, Trump can be course; but, it doesn&#039;t bother me as much as the behavior of others in the White House.

I do think those that are &quot;upset&quot; or &quot;offended&quot; or just cry that Trump isn&#039;t &quot;Presidential&quot; would find anything to be a fault with Trump.  So, their complaints do not bother me.  And with all the Russiagate and other fake news they have cried wolf too long for most folks to take them seriously on anything.

For the record I voted for Trump VERY reluctantly.  I actually considered not voting for the first time in my life (My first vote for President was that somewhat inept peanut Farmer); but, I voted anyway for Trump more as a vote against Hillary.  I was more of a anyone-but-Hillary voter.

Next time I am all in for Trump as he has delivered so much.  I have my first permanent job with benefits in 10 years, bought a house (I call it my Trump house) and am saving money for the future.  Did any of the previous Presidents do THAT for me?  Did any of my fellow Americans vote for a President that would get Americans back to work instead of telling us &quot;tough sh&#038;t&quot;?

Nope, I am all the way for Trump.  And if they want signatures for allowing him to serve for more than 2 terms I will sign!

So those who want to call me a Trump worshipper or some other nonsense - go right ahead.  Your name calling of others say more about you than it does about those you attack.  And, I will continue to laugh at the left&#039;s foolishness all the way to the bank.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Trump&#8217;s language is course at times; but, nowadays that isn&#8217;t all that out of bounds like it used to be.</p>
<p>At least he didn&#8217;t call voters a basket of deplorables, or give the middle finger to his opponent like the two most recent Democratic Presidential candidates did.</p>
<p>So, yea, Trump can be course; but, it doesn&#8217;t bother me as much as the behavior of others in the White House.</p>
<p>I do think those that are &#8220;upset&#8221; or &#8220;offended&#8221; or just cry that Trump isn&#8217;t &#8220;Presidential&#8221; would find anything to be a fault with Trump.  So, their complaints do not bother me.  And with all the Russiagate and other fake news they have cried wolf too long for most folks to take them seriously on anything.</p>
<p>For the record I voted for Trump VERY reluctantly.  I actually considered not voting for the first time in my life (My first vote for President was that somewhat inept peanut Farmer); but, I voted anyway for Trump more as a vote against Hillary.  I was more of a anyone-but-Hillary voter.</p>
<p>Next time I am all in for Trump as he has delivered so much.  I have my first permanent job with benefits in 10 years, bought a house (I call it my Trump house) and am saving money for the future.  Did any of the previous Presidents do THAT for me?  Did any of my fellow Americans vote for a President that would get Americans back to work instead of telling us &#8220;tough sh&amp;t&#8221;?</p>
<p>Nope, I am all the way for Trump.  And if they want signatures for allowing him to serve for more than 2 terms I will sign!</p>
<p>So those who want to call me a Trump worshipper or some other nonsense &#8211; go right ahead.  Your name calling of others say more about you than it does about those you attack.  And, I will continue to laugh at the left&#8217;s foolishness all the way to the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually I doubt Manju is a paid troll either. He&#039;s not very bright or well-informed. His participation is entirely sporadic. I&#039;m not sure why he bothers commenting here. But if he was paid, it seems to me he would do a better, more consistent job.

Though standards in that regard may be low.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I doubt Manju is a paid troll either. He&#8217;s not very bright or well-informed. His participation is entirely sporadic. I&#8217;m not sure why he bothers commenting here. But if he was paid, it seems to me he would do a better, more consistent job.</p>
<p>Though standards in that regard may be low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Janet		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 23:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Totally off topic, but you did bring it up tangentially. I apologize in advance if that is against the rules here. I discovered you from a link on Powerline. When I saw the name Neo, I immediately thought of the movie The Matrix and assumed you were a man. And as you surmised correctly in my case, I didn&#039;t scroll to the bottom to see your picture. Lol, I am a woman as well and I&#039;d be the last to assume you were a man because you write a political blog. P.S. I understand the need for anonymity, but are you offering Adam a bite of the forbidden fruit? ; )]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally off topic, but you did bring it up tangentially. I apologize in advance if that is against the rules here. I discovered you from a link on Powerline. When I saw the name Neo, I immediately thought of the movie The Matrix and assumed you were a man. And as you surmised correctly in my case, I didn&#8217;t scroll to the bottom to see your picture. Lol, I am a woman as well and I&#8217;d be the last to assume you were a man because you write a political blog. P.S. I understand the need for anonymity, but are you offering Adam a bite of the forbidden fruit? ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 23:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see Harry as a troll. He&#039;s a hard-headed fellow, to be sure, but then so am I. As I read him, he just doesn&#039;t want to be shut down because he&#039;s got a contrary view on Trump.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see Harry as a troll. He&#8217;s a hard-headed fellow, to be sure, but then so am I. As I read him, he just doesn&#8217;t want to be shut down because he&#8217;s got a contrary view on Trump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/10/02/trumps-style-todays-example/#comment-2457936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 22:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=90245#comment-2457936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roy Nathanson on October 3, 2019 at 6:24 am said:
..Neo should feel honored that the Leftist propaganda mills have assigned such a valuable asset to her blog.
* * *
Neo informs us Harry is a long-time reader (assuming he reads the blog between posting his comments), but I am not absolutely sure that means he is not a troll as well, in which case your point is well taken.
(And if he is not, I apologize for reading too much between the pixels. Only Harry knows for sure.)
I have seen links to Neo on Instapundit and other blogs, but I don&#039;t know how often troll farms watch for linked websites and detail watchers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy Nathanson on October 3, 2019 at 6:24 am said:<br />
..Neo should feel honored that the Leftist propaganda mills have assigned such a valuable asset to her blog.<br />
* * *<br />
Neo informs us Harry is a long-time reader (assuming he reads the blog between posting his comments), but I am not absolutely sure that means he is not a troll as well, in which case your point is well taken.<br />
(And if he is not, I apologize for reading too much between the pixels. Only Harry knows for sure.)<br />
I have seen links to Neo on Instapundit and other blogs, but I don&#8217;t know how often troll farms watch for linked websites and detail watchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
