<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Firefox: the refresh that pauses	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R.C.		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R.C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firefox deserves to die (because Brendan Eich)...only slightly less than Chrome does (because Google).

But Brave isn&#039;t half-bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox deserves to die (because Brendan Eich)&#8230;only slightly less than Chrome does (because Google).</p>
<p>But Brave isn&#8217;t half-bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie near Chicago		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie near Chicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Now this, from another dumb cluck who expected that when they (the hardware/software companies &#038; gurus) said *insert intensely reassuring claim and helpful advice here* they were speaking Truth to the Powerless:

Aesop&#039;s comment prompts me to mention  that nowadays, when I save anything at all, I try to include the URL &lt;em&gt;in the file-name.&lt;/em&gt;  What with some combination of this wonderful Mavericks OS X (which I hate;  I still run OS X 10.6.8 on the MacBook Pros) on the AirBook (a.k.a. MacBook Air for short) with or without the Cruzer flash-drives I use, it&#039;s impossible to save the URL reliably in the Comments box of the Information box for the file.

(I don&#039;t include the internet-calling designation &#039; https:// &#039; part in the URL, as a rule.  The OS doesn&#039;t approve of colons in the filename.  Sometimes it tells me I can&#039;t do that, and sometimes it substitutes a dash+space for the colon.  I do leave 2 spaces at both ends of the URL, for ease of getting the right character-string should I wish to copy the URL, but of course leave the final dot just before the file-type.  Thus,  ___  .htm  or   ___  .mp4  or  ___  .xls etc.,  where the ___ is the URL.)  

.  .  .

For those of you who use Time Machine, is it possible to use the TM backup as you start-up disk without further ado such as Carbon Copy Cloner?

Even if it isn&#039;t, will restoring directly from the TM backup put everything back precisely where it was, i.e. with the same machine addresses and so pointers?  

And that prompts me to ask whether, when restoring from TM B/U, I should somehow erase the internal HD?  (A very scary thought.  I should think that wouldn&#039;t even be possible unless you can start up from the TM external B/U.)

Thanks very much to anyone who feels moved to enlighten me.  I try to make sense of the various &quot;help&quot; sites (Apple, Mozilla, MacRumors, anything else I can find including videos), but they all seem to disagree and also seem to need a lot of reading between the lines.  I know I&#039;ve gotten some useless or downright bad advice from the good ol&#039; Genius Bar folks and the Apple techs over the phone.

And, it&#039;s true.  If it ain&#039;t broke don&#039;t fix it.  (Applies also to the Constitution, she noted with a bit of a snarl.)

--J.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this, from another dumb cluck who expected that when they (the hardware/software companies &amp; gurus) said *insert intensely reassuring claim and helpful advice here* they were speaking Truth to the Powerless:</p>
<p>Aesop&#8217;s comment prompts me to mention  that nowadays, when I save anything at all, I try to include the URL <em>in the file-name.</em>  What with some combination of this wonderful Mavericks OS X (which I hate;  I still run OS X 10.6.8 on the MacBook Pros) on the AirBook (a.k.a. MacBook Air for short) with or without the Cruzer flash-drives I use, it&#8217;s impossible to save the URL reliably in the Comments box of the Information box for the file.</p>
<p>(I don&#8217;t include the internet-calling designation &#8216; https:// &#8216; part in the URL, as a rule.  The OS doesn&#8217;t approve of colons in the filename.  Sometimes it tells me I can&#8217;t do that, and sometimes it substitutes a dash+space for the colon.  I do leave 2 spaces at both ends of the URL, for ease of getting the right character-string should I wish to copy the URL, but of course leave the final dot just before the file-type.  Thus,  ___  .htm  or   ___  .mp4  or  ___  .xls etc.,  where the ___ is the URL.)  </p>
<p>.  .  .</p>
<p>For those of you who use Time Machine, is it possible to use the TM backup as you start-up disk without further ado such as Carbon Copy Cloner?</p>
<p>Even if it isn&#8217;t, will restoring directly from the TM backup put everything back precisely where it was, i.e. with the same machine addresses and so pointers?  </p>
<p>And that prompts me to ask whether, when restoring from TM B/U, I should somehow erase the internal HD?  (A very scary thought.  I should think that wouldn&#8217;t even be possible unless you can start up from the TM external B/U.)</p>
<p>Thanks very much to anyone who feels moved to enlighten me.  I try to make sense of the various &#8220;help&#8221; sites (Apple, Mozilla, MacRumors, anything else I can find including videos), but they all seem to disagree and also seem to need a lot of reading between the lines.  I know I&#8217;ve gotten some useless or downright bad advice from the good ol&#8217; Genius Bar folks and the Apple techs over the phone.</p>
<p>And, it&#8217;s true.  If it ain&#8217;t broke don&#8217;t fix it.  (Applies also to the Constitution, she noted with a bit of a snarl.)</p>
<p>&#8211;J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 04:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One more thing - 
I have had many a miserable time trying to FIND the bookmark I wanted, especially when looking for just that one special article to link in a comment.
At some point, probably by accident, I discovered I could edit the way the link was stored in my bookmark folders by adding more descriptive content to the &quot;name&quot; (without changing the URL).
I still can&#039;t always find what I know I bookmarked, but it&#039;s getting easier.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing &#8211;<br />
I have had many a miserable time trying to FIND the bookmark I wanted, especially when looking for just that one special article to link in a comment.<br />
At some point, probably by accident, I discovered I could edit the way the link was stored in my bookmark folders by adding more descriptive content to the &#8220;name&#8221; (without changing the URL).<br />
I still can&#8217;t always find what I know I bookmarked, but it&#8217;s getting easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 03:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Pretty soon I learned to dread manufacturer and other “updates,” particularly major OS updates, which often did all sorts of basically unfathomable and untraceable things to wreck whatever set up on my computer I had developed and found satisfactory&quot;

&quot;a voice crying in the wilderness&quot; has the right idea.
One good piece of advice I read years ago was to never update an OS, outside of the few security patches that come in from time to time; better to just buy a new machine if you wanted any of the new features, or needed to be connected to other upper-dated machines. 

Keep using the one you like as well, until it dies, but be sure to update everything that you can, as amply detailed by our resident techies.

Which reminds me....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pretty soon I learned to dread manufacturer and other “updates,” particularly major OS updates, which often did all sorts of basically unfathomable and untraceable things to wreck whatever set up on my computer I had developed and found satisfactory&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;a voice crying in the wilderness&#8221; has the right idea.<br />
One good piece of advice I read years ago was to never update an OS, outside of the few security patches that come in from time to time; better to just buy a new machine if you wanted any of the new features, or needed to be connected to other upper-dated machines. </p>
<p>Keep using the one you like as well, until it dies, but be sure to update everything that you can, as amply detailed by our resident techies.</p>
<p>Which reminds me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 03:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mrs Whatsit: I ditched FireFox too after Brendan Eich was ousted.

I&#039;m using Opera which has a light footprint compared to the others. 

I&#039;ve been meaning to try Brave, but it didn&#039;t support the EverNote extension which is now essential to my browsing. I can see that it does now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrs Whatsit: I ditched FireFox too after Brendan Eich was ousted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using Opera which has a light footprint compared to the others. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to try Brave, but it didn&#8217;t support the EverNote extension which is now essential to my browsing. I can see that it does now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 03:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Now, ordinarily I am intensely conservative about anything involved with the running of my computer. That’s because I’ve noticed over and over that the people who come up with new, improved computer systems seem to have a different idea than I do about what constitutes an “improvement.”&lt;/i&gt;

neo: You got that right. When I was young and innocent, I always upgraded to the latest, greatest rev, eager as a child on Christmas morn.

Now I won&#039;t upgrade unless there is a gun to my head or I&#039;m just feeling devil-may-care. 

Having worked in the biz, I know how it works. The latest rev &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; fix a bug or two, but mostly marketing demands new features for the sake of checkbox lists, or worse, adding spyware or copy-protection schemes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now, ordinarily I am intensely conservative about anything involved with the running of my computer. That’s because I’ve noticed over and over that the people who come up with new, improved computer systems seem to have a different idea than I do about what constitutes an “improvement.”</i></p>
<p>neo: You got that right. When I was young and innocent, I always upgraded to the latest, greatest rev, eager as a child on Christmas morn.</p>
<p>Now I won&#8217;t upgrade unless there is a gun to my head or I&#8217;m just feeling devil-may-care. </p>
<p>Having worked in the biz, I know how it works. The latest rev <i>might</i> fix a bug or two, but mostly marketing demands new features for the sake of checkbox lists, or worse, adding spyware or copy-protection schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrs Whatsit		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrs Whatsit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 03:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am the poster child for the dangers of not backing up.  My ancient and never-very-good little laptop died recently.  I didn&#039;t have much on the hard drive that I needed to save -- most stuff was in the cloud, on flash drives or in other computers, which is why I hadn&#039;t worried much about backing up.  I wasn&#039;t worried about bookmarks because, hey, Chrome is portable, right?  But no, not so much. I replaced the antique with a newer and slightly fancier model, signed in to Google and opened up Chrome, which promised to remember all my bookmarks.  (I quit using Firefox after the Brendan Eich thing and hate Windows Explorer and Edge.)  And yes, it did indeed remember my bookmarks -- from several years ago.   The bookmarks and folders from the past two or three years ago were gone.  I tried all kinds of things, but that was months ago and they&#039;ve never reappeared.  I have a kind of to-heck-with-it feeling and haven&#039;t bothered since then to rebuild my library.  But when I do, I&#039;m going to 1) export them regularly and 2) back them up and 3) I don&#039;t know what else, but not trust Chrome not to lose them on me again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the poster child for the dangers of not backing up.  My ancient and never-very-good little laptop died recently.  I didn&#8217;t have much on the hard drive that I needed to save &#8212; most stuff was in the cloud, on flash drives or in other computers, which is why I hadn&#8217;t worried much about backing up.  I wasn&#8217;t worried about bookmarks because, hey, Chrome is portable, right?  But no, not so much. I replaced the antique with a newer and slightly fancier model, signed in to Google and opened up Chrome, which promised to remember all my bookmarks.  (I quit using Firefox after the Brendan Eich thing and hate Windows Explorer and Edge.)  And yes, it did indeed remember my bookmarks &#8212; from several years ago.   The bookmarks and folders from the past two or three years ago were gone.  I tried all kinds of things, but that was months ago and they&#8217;ve never reappeared.  I have a kind of to-heck-with-it feeling and haven&#8217;t bothered since then to rebuild my library.  But when I do, I&#8217;m going to 1) export them regularly and 2) back them up and 3) I don&#8217;t know what else, but not trust Chrome not to lose them on me again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vandeutely rleun:

That was absolutely NOT the problem. It ran especially slowly when I would first use it after turning the computer on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vandeutely rleun:</p>
<p>That was absolutely NOT the problem. It ran especially slowly when I would first use it after turning the computer on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jon baker		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jon baker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 02:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bilwick, I share your frustration trying to email someone with an Outlook email.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bilwick, I share your frustration trying to email someone with an Outlook email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerard vanderleun		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/08/26/firefox-the-refresh-that-pauses/#comment-2453254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerard vanderleun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=89403#comment-2453254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sometimes browsers run slower if one has too many windows open.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes browsers run slower if one has too many windows open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
