<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Alex Acosta is out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 13:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Meislin		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442958</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Meislin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The plot thickens (and sickens):
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-10/acosta-scrapped-53-page-epstein-indictment-2008-after-secret-negotiations-according

The claim is not disinterested; but is it accurate or is it spurious?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plot thickens (and sickens):<br />
<a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-10/acosta-scrapped-53-page-epstein-indictment-2008-after-secret-negotiations-according" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-10/acosta-scrapped-53-page-epstein-indictment-2008-after-secret-negotiations-according</a></p>
<p>The claim is not disinterested; but is it accurate or is it spurious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 11:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Philip on July 13, 2019 at 1:10 pm said:
So, steve, got any stock tips? &lt;/b&gt;

Buy Disney.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Philip on July 13, 2019 at 1:10 pm said:<br />
So, steve, got any stock tips? </b></p>
<p>Buy Disney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442946</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 11:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you want to be wrong, read and believe in Snopes.

If you want to not make wrong predictions... don&#039;t make predictions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to be wrong, read and believe in Snopes.</p>
<p>If you want to not make wrong predictions&#8230; don&#8217;t make predictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2019 10:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You are Fired!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are Fired!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Philip		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, steve, got any stock tips? :D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, steve, got any stock tips? 😀</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: n.n		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[n.n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“May you live in interesting times&quot;

And it&#039;s corollary: may you enjoy the liberal euphemisms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“May you live in interesting times&#8221;</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s corollary: may you enjoy the liberal euphemisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kate		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 16:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Snopes is not an unbiased outlet.  I have seen photos of Bill Clinton and Epstein.  I haven&#039;t searched recently, but then, I don&#039;t use Google, either.  Some enterprising person should compare Google searches to DuckDuckGo searches.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snopes is not an unbiased outlet.  I have seen photos of Bill Clinton and Epstein.  I haven&#8217;t searched recently, but then, I don&#8217;t use Google, either.  Some enterprising person should compare Google searches to DuckDuckGo searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manju		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manju]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 16:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re: Google removing photos of Clinton and Epstein

&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/google-clinton-epstein/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Snopes&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Did Google Remove Photos of Bill Clinton with Jeffrey Epstein from Search Results?

It is quite easy to hide something that apparently didn&#039;t exist in the first place.&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Google removing photos of Clinton and Epstein</p>
<p><a href="https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/google-clinton-epstein/" rel="nofollow">Snopes</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Did Google Remove Photos of Bill Clinton with Jeffrey Epstein from Search Results?</p>
<p>It is quite easy to hide something that apparently didn&#8217;t exist in the first place.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Brokaw		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Brokaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 12:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[“May you live in interesting times” &#060;== we are here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“May you live in interesting times” &lt;== we are here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Julie near Chicago		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/07/12/alex-acosta-is-out/#comment-2442525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie near Chicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 04:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=88423#comment-2442525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aesop does it again!  Thanks for the link to L.I., Aesop. :&#062;)

Repeated here for our eddification, from the L.I. story -- following a picture of Mr. Trump, a young girl, and Epstein, under which L.I. writes,

&lt;blockquote&gt;But there’s more — much more. There is this one, posted to Facebook by someone named Lisa Marie Durkot, who captions the image “Jeffrey Epstein and his buddy, fellow accused child rapist, Trump. Epstein smirks as Trump inappropriately touches a young girl.” &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well!  I guess that puts Trump directly under the gibbet for inappropriately fondling a young girl!

--But wait.  Not so fast!  L.I. now quotes &lt;em&gt;Politifact:&lt;/em&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;  One such post shows what looks like a photo of Epstein, Trump, and a girl, who Trump appears to be kissing on the head with his hands around her waist. &lt;/blockquote&gt;


&lt;blockquote&gt;     [T]he purported photo of Trump and Epstein featured in the Facebook post is made up of two separate images. The one of Trump is from October 1993, when he was photographed with his daughter Ivanka — the girl mentioned in the Facebook post — at the grand opening of the Harley Davidson Cafe in New York City.

    The photo of Epstein is from May 2005. He was attending the launch of RADAR MAGAZINE at Hotel QT, also in New York City. Trump is not in the picture. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2019/jul/10/viral-image/image-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-doctored/

The piece goes on to tell us,


&lt;blockquote&gt;  The one of Trump is from October 1993, when he was photographed with his daughter Ivanka — the girl mentioned in the Facebook post — at the grand opening of the Harley Davidson Cafe in New York City.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The paragraph contains a link to the photo, at

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/donald-trump-and-ivanka-trump-during-grand-opening-of-the-news-photo/104969172

Very, very interesting.  I notice that the anti-Trump piece says &quot;inappropriately touching,&quot;  whereas the &lt;em&gt;Politifact&lt;/em&gt; write-up does not suggest any out-of-the-way touching:

&lt;blockquote&gt;  One such post shows what looks like a photo of Epstein, Trump, and a girl, who Trump appears to be kissing on the head with his hands around her waist. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The original allegation and doctored image were from a Facebook posting by a Lisa Marie Durkot.  But of such minor editorializing, slanted writing are smears made, then spread, then deemed credible (at least by the credulous),  and lynchings sometimes committed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aesop does it again!  Thanks for the link to L.I., Aesop. :&gt;)</p>
<p>Repeated here for our eddification, from the L.I. story &#8212; following a picture of Mr. Trump, a young girl, and Epstein, under which L.I. writes,</p>
<blockquote><p>But there’s more — much more. There is this one, posted to Facebook by someone named Lisa Marie Durkot, who captions the image “Jeffrey Epstein and his buddy, fellow accused child rapist, Trump. Epstein smirks as Trump inappropriately touches a young girl.” </p></blockquote>
<p>Well!  I guess that puts Trump directly under the gibbet for inappropriately fondling a young girl!</p>
<p>&#8211;But wait.  Not so fast!  L.I. now quotes <em>Politifact:</em></p>
<blockquote><p>  One such post shows what looks like a photo of Epstein, Trump, and a girl, who Trump appears to be kissing on the head with his hands around her waist. </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>     [T]he purported photo of Trump and Epstein featured in the Facebook post is made up of two separate images. The one of Trump is from October 1993, when he was photographed with his daughter Ivanka — the girl mentioned in the Facebook post — at the grand opening of the Harley Davidson Cafe in New York City.</p>
<p>    The photo of Epstein is from May 2005. He was attending the launch of RADAR MAGAZINE at Hotel QT, also in New York City. Trump is not in the picture. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2019/jul/10/viral-image/image-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-doctored/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.politifact.com/facebook-fact-checks/statements/2019/jul/10/viral-image/image-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-doctored/</a></p>
<p>The piece goes on to tell us,</p>
<blockquote><p>  The one of Trump is from October 1993, when he was photographed with his daughter Ivanka — the girl mentioned in the Facebook post — at the grand opening of the Harley Davidson Cafe in New York City.  </p></blockquote>
<p>The paragraph contains a link to the photo, at</p>
<p><a href="https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/donald-trump-and-ivanka-trump-during-grand-opening-of-the-news-photo/104969172" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/donald-trump-and-ivanka-trump-during-grand-opening-of-the-news-photo/104969172</a></p>
<p>Very, very interesting.  I notice that the anti-Trump piece says &#8220;inappropriately touching,&#8221;  whereas the <em>Politifact</em> write-up does not suggest any out-of-the-way touching:</p>
<blockquote><p>  One such post shows what looks like a photo of Epstein, Trump, and a girl, who Trump appears to be kissing on the head with his hands around her waist. </p></blockquote>
<p>The original allegation and doctored image were from a Facebook posting by a Lisa Marie Durkot.  But of such minor editorializing, slanted writing are smears made, then spread, then deemed credible (at least by the credulous),  and lynchings sometimes committed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
