No, they wouldn’t. But they’d have to admit they’ve got a problem in their ranks. They don’t do that.

https://twitter.com/newsbusters/status/1128241834034106368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1128241834034106368

To the contrary, she CAN…and she DOES.
* * *
She gets a little help from her friends…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1128648020571099143.html

“If Tlaib was Republican, media would be relentlessly hounding every GOP politician, asking if they agree with her nutburger beliefs. Their responses would become headline news, creating an avalanche “narrative” about the GOP’s anti-Semitism problem and/or the party cracking up.
…
I’m not aware of a single MSM outlet asking a single other Democrat if they agree with Tlaib’s version of history. Instead, the Dems are just given open microphones to rail against the GOP for “pouncing” on a Woman of Color. They are not forced to comment on what she said.
…
The media would not allow Republicans to change the subject – no “Democrats pounce” narrative has ever been written. The media would quickly produce people to testify at their outrage over Republican Tlaib’s hateful history revisionism, including as many women as possible.”

Democrats voters seem to be trying to tell them something with the support for Biden. He is too flawed to make it to the end but who else have they got.?

What is new is the not-so-under the radar support and acquiescence of the democrats in Congress.
Their silence should be a clarion call to all who vote for democrats, in particular jewish voters.

They can’t even pass a meaningless, toothless resolution condemning the now many anti-semitic comments of Tlaib and that other huge fan in congress (I forget her name) of Adolph Hitler.

The jewish big-wigs in Congress – Shumer, Nadler, Schiff, and others have said ZERO about any of these comments. And Nancy Palsi, who has trouble speaking clearly about anything, somehow had no verbal mis-cues excusing the jewish-hate comments of her party members.
Obviously then, she must agree with them, but it would be politically incorrect to just admit it.
I guess the democrats are too busy trying to impeach Trump to bother addressing the Nazis in their house.

I read a comment somewhere that German jews in the early days of nazi Germany that were cynics got out of dodge; those that were optimists ultimately were marched into the gas chambers.
No need to speak about the rising tide of anti-semitism within academia as well.

As an aside – sort of – jewish voters will not at all think twice for voting for democrats, despite the fact that their democrat representatives have not the cohones to speak out about the rising tide of anti-semitism amongst members of their own party and among many (most?) liberal institutions (e.g., academia, the media)

But then again, given the ultra-leftist political views of most jewish voters, they already believe that Trump IS Hitler (oh, didn’t you know that Trump IS Hitler? just ask his jewish son-in-law, his jewish daughter and his jewish grand-kids. What other proof can you possibly need !! Sieg Heil Trump !!).

Perhaps the democrats are first focusing on getting rid of the Fuhrer-Trump, and later on focusing in on his underlings.

Yea, that must be it.

You’re referring to the situation in the Gulf. The Gulf Emirates and Saudi Arabia have for decades had masses of foreign residents (who constitute the majority of those present at any one time outside of SA). The ‘alien’ quality of that particular set of Arabs isn’t unusual; it’s modal. What was somewhat unusual was the durability of their residence. Most foreigners in the Gulf circulate in and out every few years.

Most Arabs with some historic connection to Mandatory Palestine live locally: in Israel, on the West Bank, in Gaza, in Jordan, or in one of the other neighboring countries.