Do we really think that large numbers of French “militant secularists” are taking the time out of their lives to vandalize the failing, mostly empty churches of France?

Occam’s Razor anyone?

Gauling?

“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.”

What, then, is 850+ times?

There is little I could add to the material at the above link except this:

What are the odds?

Do you really think that the major fire, less than a week ago, that could potentially have totally destroyed Notre Dame, was just a big “coinkydink?”

That the fire at Notre Dame, particularly one occurring during Holy Week—preceded by the arson attack against the ancient cathedral of St. Denis, outside Paris, just a week prior and this attack—taking place against the background of the reported vandalizing and/or desecration of 850 churches in France last year—was the “accident” that French authorities proclaimed it to be.

These “authorities” delivering this verdict, I note, while the fire still raged, and before the fire was contained/extinguished enough to allow anyone into the area to determine what started it?

Again, I ask, which is more likely, a random accident, or a Muslim terror attack?

Time to wake the Hell up, and face the truth!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/sri-lanka-makes-arrests-in-easter-bombing-attacks-11555918580

and were planning more “somethings”

https://metro.co.uk/2019/04/22/85-bomb-detonators-found-main-sri-lanka-bus-station-9284689/

While “some other people were celebrating Easter” according to Obama (pbuh) and others of his ilk.

https://www.thediplomad.com/2019/04/sri-lanka-massacre.html

Matt Walsh has noted that in the media the terrorists killed “Easter Worshipers” not Catholic Christians or just Christians. Many things must not be said, more than just Some things. Much like the murder of Christians in Nigeria by Someone unknown.