<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Those gentleman Republicans	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:05:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424923</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424923</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Evangelical pastors remind me of Profits (not Prophets), same as those in the Old Testament that killed the prophets for speaking blasphemy.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s because you&#039;re not thinking about evangelical pastors.  You&#039;re thinking about a small population of high-living televangelists and a scatter of troublesome megachurch entrepreneurs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Evangelical pastors remind me of Profits (not Prophets), same as those in the Old Testament that killed the prophets for speaking blasphemy.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because you&#8217;re not thinking about evangelical pastors.  You&#8217;re thinking about a small population of high-living televangelists and a scatter of troublesome megachurch entrepreneurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ymarsakar		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424918</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ymarsakar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Evangelical pastors remind me of Profits (not Prophets), same as those in the Old Testament that killed the prophets for speaking blasphemy.

The weird thing about religious fanaticism is that... what if you are on the wrong side and are killing God&#039;s actual servants while you are part of Satan, the opposition? Nobody wants to think that when they are using their Profits to molest children, buy sports cars, and lord it over the congregation as Pastors and Reverends.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evangelical pastors remind me of Profits (not Prophets), same as those in the Old Testament that killed the prophets for speaking blasphemy.</p>
<p>The weird thing about religious fanaticism is that&#8230; what if you are on the wrong side and are killing God&#8217;s actual servants while you are part of Satan, the opposition? Nobody wants to think that when they are using their Profits to molest children, buy sports cars, and lord it over the congregation as Pastors and Reverends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;But I do agree with him on Evangelicalism.&lt;/i&gt;

The problems of evangelicalism don&#039;t have much to do with the political engagement of lay evangelicals.  The evangelical leadership stratum has now and again been too explicit in its political activities, and movement evangelicals have now and again offered an overly elaborate menu of political objects.  Nothing movement evangelicals have done has injured the cause of what the Republican Party putatively stands for one-tenth as much as the general incompetence and vapidity of people like A.M. McConnell.  

As for the problems of evangelicalism as a religious dispensation, you&#039;re better off reading S.M. Hutchens, who has a granular knowledge of that territory.  And, while we&#039;re at it, they cannot begin to approach in thoroughness the failures of the last three generations of mainline clergy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But I do agree with him on Evangelicalism.</i></p>
<p>The problems of evangelicalism don&#8217;t have much to do with the political engagement of lay evangelicals.  The evangelical leadership stratum has now and again been too explicit in its political activities, and movement evangelicals have now and again offered an overly elaborate menu of political objects.  Nothing movement evangelicals have done has injured the cause of what the Republican Party putatively stands for one-tenth as much as the general incompetence and vapidity of people like A.M. McConnell.  </p>
<p>As for the problems of evangelicalism as a religious dispensation, you&#8217;re better off reading S.M. Hutchens, who has a granular knowledge of that territory.  And, while we&#8217;re at it, they cannot begin to approach in thoroughness the failures of the last three generations of mainline clergy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Deco		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Deco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Hart is one of the reasons we are in this mess. &lt;/i&gt;

Hart and Buckley bore no responsibility for the failure theatre of Republican politicians.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hart is one of the reasons we are in this mess. </i></p>
<p>Hart and Buckley bore no responsibility for the failure theatre of Republican politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Cook		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hart is one of the reasons we are in this mess. Too many years wearing deck shoes instead of combat boots. But I do agree with him on Evangelicalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hart is one of the reasons we are in this mess. Too many years wearing deck shoes instead of combat boots. But I do agree with him on Evangelicalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Molly Brown		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molly Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 07:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thinks he&#039;s Thomas Jefferson.
Would have been a Royalist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinks he&#8217;s Thomas Jefferson.<br />
Would have been a Royalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424689</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course, Hart would vote for Obama:

&lt;i&gt;“He has gone to a good school, maybe shops at J. Press, maybe plays tennis or golf, and drinks either Bombay or Beefeater martinis, or maybe Dewar’s on the rocks, or both.”&lt;/i&gt;

Obama went to prep school, then Occidental, then Columbia, and Harvard Law.  Don&#039;t know whether he shops at J. Press, but his pants are creased razor-sharp.  He plays golf, and I&#039;m sure he&#039;d just love a Beefeater martini!

What&#039;s not to like?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Hart would vote for Obama:</p>
<p><i>“He has gone to a good school, maybe shops at J. Press, maybe plays tennis or golf, and drinks either Bombay or Beefeater martinis, or maybe Dewar’s on the rocks, or both.”</i></p>
<p>Obama went to prep school, then Occidental, then Columbia, and Harvard Law.  Don&#8217;t know whether he shops at J. Press, but his pants are creased razor-sharp.  He plays golf, and I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d just love a Beefeater martini!</p>
<p>What&#8217;s not to like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cicero		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cicero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hart&#039;s  beliefs and standards are really quite antithetical to those needed by a democratic republic, if the words quoted here are representative.
He seems to be an arrogant aristocrat. Or perhaps his quotations contain the stigmata of less-than-obvious dementia. Some of his words could have come straight out of Ian Fleming&#039;s James Bond novels....&quot;shaken, not stirred&quot;.

Hart never felt himself or his country in danger, apparently. Superb and secure arrogance, a feature of the Ruling Class. Not my kinda guy, and I was once upon a time a tenured Duke faculty member. I left because of the arrogance, the pretense of nobility.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hart&#8217;s  beliefs and standards are really quite antithetical to those needed by a democratic republic, if the words quoted here are representative.<br />
He seems to be an arrogant aristocrat. Or perhaps his quotations contain the stigmata of less-than-obvious dementia. Some of his words could have come straight out of Ian Fleming&#8217;s James Bond novels&#8230;.&#8221;shaken, not stirred&#8221;.</p>
<p>Hart never felt himself or his country in danger, apparently. Superb and secure arrogance, a feature of the Ruling Class. Not my kinda guy, and I was once upon a time a tenured Duke faculty member. I left because of the arrogance, the pretense of nobility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AesopFan		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AesopFan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[parker on February 24, 2019 at 1:38 am at 1:38 am said:
All tenured professors should be required to spend a year working on a flyover country farm. Best place to get a grounding in reality. 
* * * 
Second that,and add politicians and public employees: no job in the government until you have had a job in the real world.

I just finished Jordan Peterson&#039;s &quot;Twelve Rules,&quot; and his vitae (sometimes mentioned in the book) is amazing in the degree to which he actually worked for a living outside of academia: dishwasher, gas jockey, bartender, short-order cook, beekeeper, oil derrick bit re-tipper, plywood mill labourer, railway line worker.
PLUS consultant to the UN, clinical psychologist, adviser to law firms, professor, public lecturer, and published author of more than 100 scientific papers (not social science hogwash) - plus his massive book &quot;Maps of Meaning.&quot;

I am sure this experience forms the core of both his erudition and his popularity with the multitudes, who are hungry for someone who knows great things and can still talk to regular folks.  Victor Davis Hanson is of the same ilk.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parker on February 24, 2019 at 1:38 am at 1:38 am said:<br />
All tenured professors should be required to spend a year working on a flyover country farm. Best place to get a grounding in reality.<br />
* * *<br />
Second that,and add politicians and public employees: no job in the government until you have had a job in the real world.</p>
<p>I just finished Jordan Peterson&#8217;s &#8220;Twelve Rules,&#8221; and his vitae (sometimes mentioned in the book) is amazing in the degree to which he actually worked for a living outside of academia: dishwasher, gas jockey, bartender, short-order cook, beekeeper, oil derrick bit re-tipper, plywood mill labourer, railway line worker.<br />
PLUS consultant to the UN, clinical psychologist, adviser to law firms, professor, public lecturer, and published author of more than 100 scientific papers (not social science hogwash) &#8211; plus his massive book &#8220;Maps of Meaning.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am sure this experience forms the core of both his erudition and his popularity with the multitudes, who are hungry for someone who knows great things and can still talk to regular folks.  Victor Davis Hanson is of the same ilk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sonny Wayze		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2019/02/23/those-gentleman-republicans/#comment-2424650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonny Wayze]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=85005#comment-2424650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I’m thinking some of this may have been meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek, a reference to certain cliches about conservatives.&quot;

I usually refer to this tone of voice as &#039;serious, but not solemn&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m thinking some of this may have been meant to be a bit tongue-in-cheek, a reference to certain cliches about conservatives.&#8221;</p>
<p>I usually refer to this tone of voice as &#8216;serious, but not solemn&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
