Ah, but the beauty of it all—-and it is indeed glorious—-is that while the allegations (by several women) that Fairfax is a perp may in fact be more than allegations, in prog-speak (and triple-think), Fairfax is ALSO a victim (i.e., A victim, not THE victim).

(And it matters not if any of the women making the allegations happen, themselves NOT to be Caucasian…. For they have been trumped.)

The fact that as A victim of centuries of slavery, Jim Crow—ah, what the heck, let’s just call it AMERIKKKA—Fairfax MUST be forgiven. Or if not forgiven, then understood, taken in context, empathized with.

Screw it, let’s call it forgiven.

To be sure, if Fairfax WERE a Republican, he would most certainly NOT be forgiven. NOSSSIRREE In fact, he would be an out-and-out victimizer.

(He would, no question, be Clarence Thomas-ed. Brett Kavanugh-ed, run out of town. )

Ah prog-speak. Where would we be without it?…..

Ah sheer, unalloyed, pure hypocrisy. Where would we be without IT?

The problem with Marxism is that if critical theory is applied equally it destroys the left’s ideologies just as much as the right’s, that is why free speech must be restricted since it falls apart the moment someone is allowed to raise question about it. They have to make sure the barrel can only be pointed at the right but never the left.

Good point. Also remember The Hot Crazy Matrix.

Possibly, but I wouldn’t count on it.

Reasons:
– Fairfax is a Democrat.
– Fairfax is NOT a Caucasian.
– Forcing Fairfax to quit would empower the Anti-Christ, the Devil and the enemies of everything human (keeping in mind that infanticide has become, for a certain group of people, a criterion for “humanity”).

(IOW, forcing him to quite would reek of racism, Trumpism, white supremacism and Republicanism. I.e. It’s totally Anti-American, as construed by some…but I’m repeating myself…)

And if one remains unconvinced of all the above, then just take a look at what happened to Keith Ellison.

That’s right, Keith Ellison is the template here.

QED

(Disclaimer: I sincerely hope I’m terribly wrong about this….)

Too late. During the #metoo height last year, an acquaintance of mine wrote on Facebook that verbal assent might only be due to internal fear (of whatever) and not consent at all. I refrained from pointing out that she had just warned everyone that she could not be trusted to give any consent ever. And by extension, if men cannot trust verbal consent to be valid, then why should they bother with checking for consent at all?

Fairfax, after Kavanaugh, has to go. Women with times & places and some prior discussion with friends. A VA state delegate, Patrick Hope, is preparing impeachment papers:
“I believe these women, he needs to resign immediately,” Hope said. “There’s no question that violent sexual assault is a ‘high crime.’”

There might well be other women with more stories of Alpha-jerk Fairfax having “semi-consensual” sex, as one-night stands without calling back.

It would be good to get a more honest discussion of “consent”. It seems to me, if one person is offering their penis, an “open mouth” is consent, even without actively saying yes. An alternative for the first woman would have been to collapse on the floor, and then say “I can’t do this”, or somesuch.

I’d guess the two memories of the events no longer match, and like Rashomon, we will never know “the truth”. They could even both pass lie detector tests with different versions of what happened.

It would be good to establish that “opening the mouth” is sufficient for consent — so women could be taught a non-verbal way of “saying no”. When pressed or held, fall on floor and keep mouth closed.

As I write this, I imagine the first one, who doesn’t like oral sex at all (according to an ex-boyfriend), after heavy kissing and getting Fairfax excited, being a bit surprised to be pushed down so she was eye-mouth level with an erection.
What to do?

She should have shook her head no, then gone lower with head and said “No, I’m not ready for this”. Why didn’t she? Probably because she was still hoping for romance with a possible Mr. Right, an up and coming intelligent and nice looking, hot kissing Alpha guy was getting her pretty hot, too, tho not quite ready for this. Instead, another Dem Alpha-jerk.

Notice prior promiscuity or not has not been a big topic — that, at least, is definitely social progress.

Now I’m wondering how often Dem male leaders push their dates to give them oral sex — so there’s no need for the man to give much sexual satisfaction back.

Finally, if a woman is in bed with a guy and doesn’t want to go all the way, she should keep her panties on. Not take them off. Not lift up her bottom to let him take them off. Keep her panties on.