The Dems are busy trying to make tribes so as to divide America, hoping more American tribes will support the Dems.

Only repeated and massive failure, in gaining reported votes, will stop the Dems.

It will also be necessary that colleges stop discriminating against pro-lifers and Reps. That might be an earlier step, after colleges which do discriminate lose their tax-exemptions due to their semi-illegal discrimination. (It ain’t illegal if they ain’t gettin’ caught).

I have absolutely no compasion for people who enter illegally. That doesn’t mean I want them to starve, I just want them tossed out of the country.”

One naturally asks: why don’t they fight back in their own country to get what they consider as rightfully theirs, if they are suffering an injustice?

The answers of course, are relatively obvious: first among them is that they, the “victims” are too weak, or too incompetent, or too fearful, or too inhibited to do so.

Which then leads to the question as to: Why Americans should suffer the injustice second hand, rather than rectifying the problem “over there”?

Using Maduro, or the Mexican political class as examples of those who don’t seem to have any qualms about doing unto their own citizens: why then should we who are subject to the fallout generated by these punk regimes, have qualms about what means we use to get to the root of the problem?

It’s not as if we would actually have to risk any American lives, given the technologies at our disposal.

And that answer is pretty obvious too: That most folks – or enough of a fainting and hand flapping kind to make a difference – would rather let their tyrannical neighbors beat their children and shovel shit over the fence, than allow the men of the family to go next door and handle the tyrant by whatever means are necessary.

You can see this anytime the crowd starts shrieking when someone who has previously been aggressively obnoxious is seen getting his ass handed to him. They start shouting “stop, stop!!” without knowing or caring about the facts. Their primary concern is mercy for the provocateur who caused it all. They don’t care about causes and the right or the wrong of it. Every man here who has been in a physical confrontation in mixed company in public, has experienced it or witnessed it and knows exactly what I am talking about.

Again for the umpteenth time: what obligation do Americans have to be put upon, by people who cannot, or will not defend themselves, much less be put on, even at second hand by the effects of their persecutors?

” The pressure of a hunger strike depends, of course, on those in power having a sense of morality, because truly tyrannical regimes couldn’t care less if those in its prisons or detention centers starve themselves to death. Fewer mouths to feed.”

“A sense of “morality”.

Mouths to feed aside: Someone, if they feel capable, remind me why non-tyrants, libertarians for example, should care if an antagonist or criminal starves itself to death. And remember, as good secularists and presumptive atheists, no religious answers are allowed; and furthermore “affect” is a stupid answer as it cannot suffice as grounds for a public law in a pluralistic society, nor extend beyond its own reach as an emotional impulse.

Reciprocal and distributive moral imperatives, without God, demonstrable syllogistically, is what we are after.

Are we going to find anyone sensitive-right or left who can give such an answer?

No. I think the evidence of 40 or 50 years of failure on that score [John Rawls’ complex exercise in circular argument, standing as the acme of such futility] pretty much establishes the case in practical terms.

But if any progressives or sensitive conservatives think they have an answer that solves the problem while accounting for man as a rational and self-interested animal, they are welcome to try an give an answer.

Progressives of course don’t even try anymore. That’s why they have descended beneath reason, and now dwell in the swamps of political emotion: expressive of a “will” they cannot truly explain or even coherently own.

The lawyer’s last name is Kaur, which is the most common last name for female Sikhs. The native language of Sikhs is Punjabi, so it is very likely that Ruby Kaur speaks Punjabi or, if she is an upstanding member of that community, she knows somebody who does.

A historical anecdote on a hunger strike. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Irish_hunger_strike

On 5 May, Sands died in the prison hospital on the sixty-sixth day of his hunger strike, prompting rioting in nationalist areas of Northern Ireland.

On the other hand, the U.S. government has every right to set conditions aliens must meet in order to gain entry into this country, and any other conditions once they enter, including whether and how they can work their way towards citizenship.