From the Great Foot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_chop

The tomahawk chop is a sports celebration most popularly used by fans of the American Florida State University Seminoles, Atlanta Braves baseball team, the Kansas City Chiefs American football team and the English Exeter Chiefs rugby union team. The action involves moving the forearm forwards and backwards repetitively with an open palm to simulate a tomahawk chopping, and is often accompanied by a distinctive cheer.[1] The Atlanta Braves also developed a foam tomahawk to complement the fan actions.

Details follow.

.

IMO, it’s mighty funny how the Indians seemed to go in just a few years from being generally of the opinion that sports teams like the Blackhawks, the Fighting Illini, the Redskins, so forth were complimenting them and giving them good publicity, and were mostly fine with it — in spite of the Lefty cries about demeaning or patronising or mocking them — to getting on the bandwagon themselves.

You know, all of us who follow Neo’s weblog and participate in its activities do constitute a Group.

I think that therefore we also are entitled to reparations, special favorable treatment, perks, etc. that are given to various groups who can claim to have been victims. I mean, we’ve all had to put up with being put down, smeared, called names, etc. by various members of the public, as if we were part of the VRWC (Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy), no? Personally, my feelings are hurt and I am offended. I did even go so far as to put a bumper-sticker saying “It’s time for Concealed Carry in Illinois” on my car without suffering any negative consequences, but I figure that’s just a lucky fluke.

I think we should all get neon-green baseball caps that say “We Support Neo-neocon!”

And those of us who are sufficiently combat-minded could have special ones made up, half neon-green and half day-glo purple. The day-glo purple half could simply say, “VRWC!”

The phrase “money is fungible” should be applied, let us say, liberally. Especially since those other Kristol projects have provided a nice parachute for the most NeverTrump Weekly Standard writers.

When I worked for a newspaper, back in the Stone Age, we reporters were taught to go out and get the facts of a story ourselves, not write a story about what other papers, radio, and TV news were reporting. That’s gone with the sabre-tooth tigers, I guess.

by the way do you really think cnn has no idea who the black Israelites are? do you think they really believed they were “four young black men preaching the bible.” these racist bigots have been around for years. they have been in the news for years. cnn knew exactly who these bigots were and what they do. but resorting to any lie to advance the political agenda is alright with a politically biased media. it is exactly the kind of media you have in a communist country.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8kxeFb84iw

.

Mrs Whatsit, good for you. Thanks for engaging my inner Jiminy Cricket — I plan to do likewise.

Kate, thanks for the B.I. info. And yes, I too heard the anti-Jewish diatribes.

Marina, thanks for the links.

SDN, interesting piece at PJM.

It has already begun with Diane Feinstein and Mazie “Hirohito” as Ace calls her.

First Feinstein, who attacked Barrett’s religion in hearings for her Circuit Court nomination.

“When you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you,” Feinstein said. “And that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for for years in this country.” Feinstein is clearly hinting here at the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, a ruling that Feinstein supports so vociferously that she has even called it a “super-precedent.”

Remember no “religious test ?”

Then there is Hirono.

Please tell me why you believe you were being truthful
when you testified that, “we didn’t draw any conclusions about how an appellate judge who is a consciences objector should behave.”

And:

Please tell me why you believe you were being truthful when you testified that the “only conclusion the article reached” was that “if I were being considered for a trial court, I would recuse myself and not actually enter the order of execution.”

It will be a bloodbath and I hope Barrett is willing to soldier through. It will be worse than Kavanaugh. I wonder if anyone asked Ginsberg about abortion since she was Planned Parenthood’s attorney?

https://www.omaha.com/news/nation/who-is-nathan-phillips-years-ago-omaha-tribe-member-said/article_6cc049c4-d6d8-5e3c-8ee6-939a203682af.html