<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why did so many of the trees in Paradise survive the fire, when nearly all the homes were incinerated?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 03:58:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cicero		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413174</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cicero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jolly good discussion by well-informed folks.
Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jolly good discussion by well-informed folks.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The problem with an underground fire shelter is not the carbon monoxide but the possibility of the fire sucking out all the oxygen. It&#039;s not impossible to build one that might not happen to, but odds are that the average person would not be able to attend it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with an underground fire shelter is not the carbon monoxide but the possibility of the fire sucking out all the oxygen. It&#8217;s not impossible to build one that might not happen to, but odds are that the average person would not be able to attend it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Saunders		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Saunders]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Lee&#062;&lt;/i&gt; -- The is no private fire insurance available for places like Paradise.  the state strong-armed private insurers to participate in something called the California FAIR Plan, which issues limited fire insurance on a very restrictive basis.  I have no idea how much it costs.  And after the fires will come the mudslides, which FAIR does not insure against.  Actually, considering the fires, mudslides and earthquakes, geographically, California is a lousy place to live.  (Read John McPhee&#039;s essay, &quot;California Against the Mountains&quot;.)  It&#039;s just that the climate is so wonderful, everyone, from Chinese billionaires to homeless people, wants to live here.  You just have to fight like hell to keep your brain from turning into mush.

Actually, not all of California is so bad.  We don&#039;t permit things like wildfires and mudslides in Beverly Hills.

&lt;i&gt;om&lt;/i&gt; -- As you say, &quot;the environmental movement is a affliction of the wealthy, burning other peoples money to protect their “health” from very small or nonexistent risks.&quot;  If you don&#039;t work with asbestos without the proper safety equipment, the chances of your getting asbestosis or other diseases from it are virtually nil.  But its fire-resisting characteristics are unmatched.  Nothing could &quot;fireproof&quot; against burning jet fuel, but asbestos would have held longer, enabling more people to have gotten out of the World Trade Towers before they collapsed.  But hey, what&#039;s more important, a mouse getting cancer or people dying in a fire?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lee&gt;</i> &#8212; The is no private fire insurance available for places like Paradise.  the state strong-armed private insurers to participate in something called the California FAIR Plan, which issues limited fire insurance on a very restrictive basis.  I have no idea how much it costs.  And after the fires will come the mudslides, which FAIR does not insure against.  Actually, considering the fires, mudslides and earthquakes, geographically, California is a lousy place to live.  (Read John McPhee&#8217;s essay, &#8220;California Against the Mountains&#8221;.)  It&#8217;s just that the climate is so wonderful, everyone, from Chinese billionaires to homeless people, wants to live here.  You just have to fight like hell to keep your brain from turning into mush.</p>
<p>Actually, not all of California is so bad.  We don&#8217;t permit things like wildfires and mudslides in Beverly Hills.</p>
<p><i>om</i> &#8212; As you say, &#8220;the environmental movement is a affliction of the wealthy, burning other peoples money to protect their “health” from very small or nonexistent risks.&#8221;  If you don&#8217;t work with asbestos without the proper safety equipment, the chances of your getting asbestosis or other diseases from it are virtually nil.  But its fire-resisting characteristics are unmatched.  Nothing could &#8220;fireproof&#8221; against burning jet fuel, but asbestos would have held longer, enabling more people to have gotten out of the World Trade Towers before they collapsed.  But hey, what&#8217;s more important, a mouse getting cancer or people dying in a fire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sergey:

That is all true regarding asbestos-form minerals (ampiboles and possibly some zeolites).  It was argued in the geologial literature in the 1980s when Canadian producers fought the ban on all asbestos because the varieties they produced were, they felt, not carcinogenic.  The &quot;Canadian&quot; argument lost.  So now the optical microscopy test is based on the aspect ratio (length/width) of the fibrous mineral in the sample IIRC.

An example of the small animal carcinogen large animal (human) non carcinogen effect is TCE (trichloroethylene) in groundwater,  IIRC TCE is a carcinogen in mice. but not in rats, and not in humans, but many, many, many groundwater remediation projects have been required to remove TCE from groundwater to &quot;protect&quot; public health.  So even the small animal to large animal approach to environmental toxicology is not without flaws.  In some ways the environmental movement is a affliction of the wealthy, burning other peoples money to protect their &quot;health&quot; from very small or nonexistent risks.  But this is the USA.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sergey:</p>
<p>That is all true regarding asbestos-form minerals (ampiboles and possibly some zeolites).  It was argued in the geologial literature in the 1980s when Canadian producers fought the ban on all asbestos because the varieties they produced were, they felt, not carcinogenic.  The &#8220;Canadian&#8221; argument lost.  So now the optical microscopy test is based on the aspect ratio (length/width) of the fibrous mineral in the sample IIRC.</p>
<p>An example of the small animal carcinogen large animal (human) non carcinogen effect is TCE (trichloroethylene) in groundwater,  IIRC TCE is a carcinogen in mice. but not in rats, and not in humans, but many, many, many groundwater remediation projects have been required to remove TCE from groundwater to &#8220;protect&#8221; public health.  So even the small animal to large animal approach to environmental toxicology is not without flaws.  In some ways the environmental movement is a affliction of the wealthy, burning other peoples money to protect their &#8220;health&#8221; from very small or nonexistent risks.  But this is the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sergey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These health effects are reported in epidemiological studies that do not differentiate chrysotile asbestos from amphibolite asbestos, since many commercially available batches are of the mixed kind. But as was established in experimental studies, residence time of the asbestos fibers in lungs for the latter is about 20-30 times longer than for the former due to the form of the fibers: spiral for amphibolite variety and flat for chrysotile. This is a crucial difference since our lungs have natural mechanisms of cleaning themselves from any particulate matter, and only when these mechanisms get overwhelmed the harmful effects could be expected. Israel also is not the Soviet Union, but asbestos is a very prominent building material there, almost all caravans and temporary dwellings are made from asbestos-derived materials, which makes sense in a very arid and hot climate with high fire hazard, not much different from California.
     I also remind that there is a world of difference between &quot;potentially cancerogenic&quot; as shown in animal experimentation with rats and mice, and actually cancerogenic for humans. There are thousands of potentially cancerogenic substances widely used in industry, farming and even for domestic needs, but only very few of them are actually cancerogenic for humans. But this distinction is completely absent in popular presentation of science, which allows environmentalists to raise the alarm and demand ban on use of perfectly innocuous stuff, like common pesticides and herbicides. The mechanisms of tumorogenesis in humans are totally different from those in short-lived animals, so such extrapolation of animal studies on humans makes no biological sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These health effects are reported in epidemiological studies that do not differentiate chrysotile asbestos from amphibolite asbestos, since many commercially available batches are of the mixed kind. But as was established in experimental studies, residence time of the asbestos fibers in lungs for the latter is about 20-30 times longer than for the former due to the form of the fibers: spiral for amphibolite variety and flat for chrysotile. This is a crucial difference since our lungs have natural mechanisms of cleaning themselves from any particulate matter, and only when these mechanisms get overwhelmed the harmful effects could be expected. Israel also is not the Soviet Union, but asbestos is a very prominent building material there, almost all caravans and temporary dwellings are made from asbestos-derived materials, which makes sense in a very arid and hot climate with high fire hazard, not much different from California.<br />
     I also remind that there is a world of difference between &#8220;potentially cancerogenic&#8221; as shown in animal experimentation with rats and mice, and actually cancerogenic for humans. There are thousands of potentially cancerogenic substances widely used in industry, farming and even for domestic needs, but only very few of them are actually cancerogenic for humans. But this distinction is completely absent in popular presentation of science, which allows environmentalists to raise the alarm and demand ban on use of perfectly innocuous stuff, like common pesticides and herbicides. The mechanisms of tumorogenesis in humans are totally different from those in short-lived animals, so such extrapolation of animal studies on humans makes no biological sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 06:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Asbestos health effects are not all a &quot;scare or hype.&quot;  Regarding asbestos, it is true that the specific mineral involved makes a big difference but that is moot at this point.  You cannot buy or use asbestos in building materials in the USA.  This ain&#039;t the Soviet Union, although California is trying hard to catch up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos health effects are not all a &#8220;scare or hype.&#8221;  Regarding asbestos, it is true that the specific mineral involved makes a big difference but that is moot at this point.  You cannot buy or use asbestos in building materials in the USA.  This ain&#8217;t the Soviet Union, although California is trying hard to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sergey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 06:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists are the most biologically ignorant pressure groups everywhere, but in California they are especially aggressive and vocal and the harm they inflict is especially damaging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmentalists are the most biologically ignorant pressure groups everywhere, but in California they are especially aggressive and vocal and the harm they inflict is especially damaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sergey		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sergey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Asbestos scare is an example of an unreasonable panic and ignorance. White asbestos is not a health hazard, it is widely used in Russia in construction for siding, roof tiles, thermal insulation and many other applications. Quartz is not a carcinogen either. To get a silicosis one need decades of exposure to dust in mines, so these fears are also widely exaggerated. In the Middle East sandstorms happen several times a year, when sand dust is suspended in air for days, but no increase in lung diseases is observed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asbestos scare is an example of an unreasonable panic and ignorance. White asbestos is not a health hazard, it is widely used in Russia in construction for siding, roof tiles, thermal insulation and many other applications. Quartz is not a carcinogen either. To get a silicosis one need decades of exposure to dust in mines, so these fears are also widely exaggerated. In the Middle East sandstorms happen several times a year, when sand dust is suspended in air for days, but no increase in lung diseases is observed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sergey:

In the USA asbestos-based siding (used to be called Transite) is not legal anywhere.    Hardiplank and Hardiboard is a portland cement based siding product that is fire resistant but even that is regulated in California as a potential carcinogen because it contains significant amounts of SiO2 (aka quartz).  You have to use specific techniques/tools to lessen exposure to dust when cutting it (I&#039;ve installed it).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sergey:</p>
<p>In the USA asbestos-based siding (used to be called Transite) is not legal anywhere.    Hardiplank and Hardiboard is a portland cement based siding product that is fire resistant but even that is regulated in California as a potential carcinogen because it contains significant amounts of SiO2 (aka quartz).  You have to use specific techniques/tools to lessen exposure to dust when cutting it (I&#8217;ve installed it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom G		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/11/21/why-did-so-many-of-the-trees-in-paradise-survive-the-fire-when-nearly-all-the-homes-were-incinerated/#comment-2413098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=82630#comment-2413098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[America - long and still the Greatest Country on Earth.
Make America Great Again -- a fine slogan, since the Dems want to denigrate so many Great things about America.
Dems have so much trouble: Is America Great?  Was America Great?  Even with slavery, and Dem Party Jim Crow KKK laws? (They usually leave off the Dem Party part.) If not, how can it be Great again?

So much to be thankful for -- but imperfect America, and Great Americans, still have work to so.  And like so many normal people, are a bit lazy and would rather have fun rather do the hard work like many prior generations did do.

Happy Thanksgiving - please give Thanks for America, for Due Process, for Separation of Church and State, for Separation of Powers, for Federal Laws and State Laws, for Good Judges, for Good Politicians.

In discussions, please focus on the goals: an America where everybody is Free - as long as they&#039;re not physically hurting others. An America that celebrates Life, Human Life, Lives of people who choose to live their dreams -- more than ever in all history.

A Rich America, where those who are responsible and work, and avoid sex outside of marriage, can buy their own homes and raise their families in safety and dignity, whatever race or class they came from

America, with the Greatest Ideals for a country, exceptional among those ever on Earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America &#8211; long and still the Greatest Country on Earth.<br />
Make America Great Again &#8212; a fine slogan, since the Dems want to denigrate so many Great things about America.<br />
Dems have so much trouble: Is America Great?  Was America Great?  Even with slavery, and Dem Party Jim Crow KKK laws? (They usually leave off the Dem Party part.) If not, how can it be Great again?</p>
<p>So much to be thankful for &#8212; but imperfect America, and Great Americans, still have work to so.  And like so many normal people, are a bit lazy and would rather have fun rather do the hard work like many prior generations did do.</p>
<p>Happy Thanksgiving &#8211; please give Thanks for America, for Due Process, for Separation of Church and State, for Separation of Powers, for Federal Laws and State Laws, for Good Judges, for Good Politicians.</p>
<p>In discussions, please focus on the goals: an America where everybody is Free &#8211; as long as they&#8217;re not physically hurting others. An America that celebrates Life, Human Life, Lives of people who choose to live their dreams &#8212; more than ever in all history.</p>
<p>A Rich America, where those who are responsible and work, and avoid sex outside of marriage, can buy their own homes and raise their families in safety and dignity, whatever race or class they came from</p>
<p>America, with the Greatest Ideals for a country, exceptional among those ever on Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
