<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Toxic Sarah Jeong revisited	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/</link>
	<description>A blog about political change, among other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:25:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom G		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roy &quot;If you tell me that political correctness for employment is now a requirement, I guess I have to believe you. But, I will never accept that it is right or just.&quot;

Look up Google&#039;s treatment of James Damore, try this one:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/lawsuit-goes-after-alleged-anti-conservative-bias-at-google/ 

It&#039;s not right, nor just, but it IS part of the on-going culture war.

Today, Sili Valli is strongly anti-Christian, mildly or strongly anti-conservative, and very anti-Republican.   Capitalism &#038; Libertarians (both L &#038; little &quot;l&quot; like me) are not yet shunned &#038; shamed and in the closet. 

It&#039;s very true that we who fight against the monstrous Democrat post-modern PC bullies must be aware that &quot;... the abyss is staring back&quot;, into us.

But we are in a fight, a war, a culture war.  And War Is Hell.
American good guys have been losing.
Trump, very imperfect, perhaps worse than U.S. Grant, is willing and able to fight the Dem PC bullies.  Like Lincoln said of Grant: &quot;I can&#039;t spare this man, he fights.&quot;  
Unlike the (better man?) Romney, or GW Bush (remember, so long ago now, Bush Derangement Syndrome?).  Bush fought Saddam, but not against the Dem PC bullies.  Nor against Obama, but he&#039;s willing to strike a few blows against Trump, stupidly.

McCain IS willing to fight -- against Reps, so as to be a better darling token Rep of the Dem media.  He&#039;s not willing to fight much against the Dem PC bullies.

I liked Cruz, but don&#039;t think he would be as good a fighter as Trump.


War is hell.  I&#039;m glad, glad, glad the USA nuked Hiroshima to end WW II, rather than another bloody invasion, like D-Day plus Okinawa (but 10* worse).  Using nukes is monstrous.  

But losing against the bad guys is worse.  See Democratic Socialism, available for 20 years in Venezuela, and going ... strong? ... or something.

The Dem PC bullies won&#039;t use this quote from Reagan, but they sure act like it on the culture war:  &quot;we win, they lose&quot;.

Free Americans, the &quot;normals&quot;, need to win.  At minimal monstrousnous, but winning is most important.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy &#8220;If you tell me that political correctness for employment is now a requirement, I guess I have to believe you. But, I will never accept that it is right or just.&#8221;</p>
<p>Look up Google&#8217;s treatment of James Damore, try this one:<br />
<a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/lawsuit-goes-after-alleged-anti-conservative-bias-at-google/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/lawsuit-goes-after-alleged-anti-conservative-bias-at-google/</a> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not right, nor just, but it IS part of the on-going culture war.</p>
<p>Today, Sili Valli is strongly anti-Christian, mildly or strongly anti-conservative, and very anti-Republican.   Capitalism &amp; Libertarians (both L &amp; little &#8220;l&#8221; like me) are not yet shunned &amp; shamed and in the closet. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s very true that we who fight against the monstrous Democrat post-modern PC bullies must be aware that &#8220;&#8230; the abyss is staring back&#8221;, into us.</p>
<p>But we are in a fight, a war, a culture war.  And War Is Hell.<br />
American good guys have been losing.<br />
Trump, very imperfect, perhaps worse than U.S. Grant, is willing and able to fight the Dem PC bullies.  Like Lincoln said of Grant: &#8220;I can&#8217;t spare this man, he fights.&#8221;<br />
Unlike the (better man?) Romney, or GW Bush (remember, so long ago now, Bush Derangement Syndrome?).  Bush fought Saddam, but not against the Dem PC bullies.  Nor against Obama, but he&#8217;s willing to strike a few blows against Trump, stupidly.</p>
<p>McCain IS willing to fight &#8212; against Reps, so as to be a better darling token Rep of the Dem media.  He&#8217;s not willing to fight much against the Dem PC bullies.</p>
<p>I liked Cruz, but don&#8217;t think he would be as good a fighter as Trump.</p>
<p>War is hell.  I&#8217;m glad, glad, glad the USA nuked Hiroshima to end WW II, rather than another bloody invasion, like D-Day plus Okinawa (but 10* worse).  Using nukes is monstrous.  </p>
<p>But losing against the bad guys is worse.  See Democratic Socialism, available for 20 years in Venezuela, and going &#8230; strong? &#8230; or something.</p>
<p>The Dem PC bullies won&#8217;t use this quote from Reagan, but they sure act like it on the culture war:  &#8220;we win, they lose&#8221;.</p>
<p>Free Americans, the &#8220;normals&#8221;, need to win.  At minimal monstrousnous, but winning is most important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom G		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393212</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I hate whitey because he&#039;s white... W I T E&quot; ...
That was joking, then.  (SNL, Eddie Murphy?)

For far too long in black majority K-12 schools, this has been implicit and is now becoming explicit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I hate whitey because he&#8217;s white&#8230; W I T E&#8221; &#8230;<br />
That was joking, then.  (SNL, Eddie Murphy?)</p>
<p>For far too long in black majority K-12 schools, this has been implicit and is now becoming explicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Jewett		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Jewett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 04:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The NYT has been vile since at least the 1930s.   Look up the Holodomor and Walter Duranty.   The NYT whitewashed genocide in support of Communism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NYT has been vile since at least the 1930s.   Look up the Holodomor and Walter Duranty.   The NYT whitewashed genocide in support of Communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roy

Given what happened to Candace Owen in Philadephia this morning; assaulted by Antifa in a restaurant, your preening about our &quot;Principles&quot; in response to those who have none, is sounding to me like Concern Trolling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy</p>
<p>Given what happened to Candace Owen in Philadephia this morning; assaulted by Antifa in a restaurant, your preening about our &#8220;Principles&#8221; in response to those who have none, is sounding to me like Concern Trolling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roy Nathanson		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Nathanson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 14:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To the responses above, I am reminded of a quotation:

&quot;Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.&quot;

-- Friedrich Nietzsche]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the responses above, I am reminded of a quotation:</p>
<p>&#8220;Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212; Friedrich Nietzsche</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tatterdemalian		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2393013</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tatterdemalian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 07:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2393013</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Principles matter. Period. Without them, what are we? No better than the barbarians at the gate.&quot;

Principles that you don&#039;t enforce are just whining words not worth the breath and spittle it took to form them. If you want rule of law, you&#039;d better enforce it, because not just the barbarians, but nature itself, will enforce its own law (Might Makes Right) all over so-called civilization if you let it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Principles matter. Period. Without them, what are we? No better than the barbarians at the gate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Principles that you don&#8217;t enforce are just whining words not worth the breath and spittle it took to form them. If you want rule of law, you&#8217;d better enforce it, because not just the barbarians, but nature itself, will enforce its own law (Might Makes Right) all over so-called civilization if you let it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: om		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2392995</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[om]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2392995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roy

Principles matter indeed, except to SJWs, to them Power matters.  You forget that at your peril.  Wishing and hoping that the left believes in free speech or will respect your rights is naive.  Assuming that your social media profile will not be used against you by the SJW mobs or by a SJW working in corporate  &quot;human resources&quot;  is foolish.  That&#039;s the USA of today, not the USA of 1988.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy</p>
<p>Principles matter indeed, except to SJWs, to them Power matters.  You forget that at your peril.  Wishing and hoping that the left believes in free speech or will respect your rights is naive.  Assuming that your social media profile will not be used against you by the SJW mobs or by a SJW working in corporate  &#8220;human resources&#8221;  is foolish.  That&#8217;s the USA of today, not the USA of 1988.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Theo		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2392993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2392993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;As for the rest, it’s improvisation and status games all the way down and merits no deference, respect, or engagement. That’s true whether their discourse aspires to be highbrow (Corey Robin), middlebrow (Paul Krugman), or lowbrow (this ho’).&quot; -Art Deco (above) -- Beautiful parallel structure. Big UPvote.
Huxley - agreed. The agitated leftists are all about category errors - and really crappy metaphors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for the rest, it’s improvisation and status games all the way down and merits no deference, respect, or engagement. That’s true whether their discourse aspires to be highbrow (Corey Robin), middlebrow (Paul Krugman), or lowbrow (this ho’).&#8221; -Art Deco (above) &#8212; Beautiful parallel structure. Big UPvote.<br />
Huxley &#8211; agreed. The agitated leftists are all about category errors &#8211; and really crappy metaphors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: huxley		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2392990</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[huxley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 03:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2392990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Jeong speaks of “code” as if she knows how to program.&lt;/i&gt;

Johann Amadeus Metesky: Speaking as a programmer, I thought she was committing a category error when she used the word, &quot;code.&quot;

Contrary to Jeong&#039;s claims, &quot;code&quot; is as neutral as letters of the alphabet. It&#039;s only when a designer/programmer creates a user interface with code that one encounters issues of social signaling and speech.

A for-loop which counts from 1 to 1000 is perfectly valid and typical &quot;code&quot; but incurs no social issues of such dear concern to the SJW heart. Programmers don&#039;t use the word, &quot;code,&quot; like Jeong does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Jeong speaks of “code” as if she knows how to program.</i></p>
<p>Johann Amadeus Metesky: Speaking as a programmer, I thought she was committing a category error when she used the word, &#8220;code.&#8221;</p>
<p>Contrary to Jeong&#8217;s claims, &#8220;code&#8221; is as neutral as letters of the alphabet. It&#8217;s only when a designer/programmer creates a user interface with code that one encounters issues of social signaling and speech.</p>
<p>A for-loop which counts from 1 to 1000 is perfectly valid and typical &#8220;code&#8221; but incurs no social issues of such dear concern to the SJW heart. Programmers don&#8217;t use the word, &#8220;code,&#8221; like Jeong does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Johann Amadeus Metesky		</title>
		<link>https://thenewneo.com/2018/08/03/toxic-sarah-jeong-revisited/#comment-2392976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johann Amadeus Metesky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2018 00:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thenewneo.com/?p=79472#comment-2392976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;In the meantime I’m looking into Jeong’s tech creds. She was hired on the basis of her alleged tech expertise&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

One suspects that Jeong&#039;s leftist racialist viewpoints were more important factors in  her hiring than her tech credentials. 

Within the last two months I&#039;ve put together a laser engraver and learned how to use related software. I&#039;ve also started designing parts with a CAD program and printed those parts on a 3D printer that I&#039;ve upgraded myself. Could Jeong do the same?

Jeong speaks of &quot;code&quot; as if she knows how to program. My guess is that she wouldn&#039;t be able to tell the difference between G-code and Morse code, let alone the difference between C++ and Fortran.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;In the meantime I’m looking into Jeong’s tech creds. She was hired on the basis of her alleged tech expertise&#8221;</i></p>
<p>One suspects that Jeong&#8217;s leftist racialist viewpoints were more important factors in  her hiring than her tech credentials. </p>
<p>Within the last two months I&#8217;ve put together a laser engraver and learned how to use related software. I&#8217;ve also started designing parts with a CAD program and printed those parts on a 3D printer that I&#8217;ve upgraded myself. Could Jeong do the same?</p>
<p>Jeong speaks of &#8220;code&#8221; as if she knows how to program. My guess is that she wouldn&#8217;t be able to tell the difference between G-code and Morse code, let alone the difference between C++ and Fortran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
