I only mention this because Trump-Putin isn’t the only issue where the left is completely incoherent. Among many others is the Constitution. This is why they expect their appointees to act as unelected politicians in what they consider a superlegislature and rubber stamp their policy preference or simply impose it and then claim it’s in the Constitution when it’s not. And this is why the left is losing its mind over Kavanauigh. They know perfectly well the entire leftist agenda is unconstitutional and a Supreme Court with a majority of originalists scares their pants off.

Where they become incoherent, and therefore give the game away, is that they despise the Constitution and the founders who wrote it. This is why the left, and mindless centrists who couldn’t be bothered to actually listen to what Obama was saying but wanted to prove they weren’t racist, voted for a “fundamental transformation” of this country. What does that mean? It means the very foundation of our country is illegitimate in their eyes. Leftists, including legislators at all levels of government, have openly said that the Constitution was written by a bunch of slave-holding patriarchal white men to uphold a system of white supremacy and and white privilege.

Are we then to believe that they have all kinds of respect for the Constitution when they get on the Supreme Court and deem the leftist agenda Constitutional. And by the way I’m including Roberts and Kennedy as men of the left on certain issues. Roberts on Obamacare (although Scalia said in his dissent that after all the logical gymnastics Roberts had to engage in order to rewrite the law on several occasions while “shamelessly” and obviously falsely claiming he was only interpreting the law it should be called SCOTUScare) and Kennedy on abortion and SSM. Leftists are simply unconcerned about being absurd and incoherent when it comes to imposing their policy preferences. For instance Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote the dissent in both the Masterpiece bakery and Trump Travel Order cases.

In the Trump Travel order case she wrote that this nation was founded on the principle of religious liberty and that Trump was displaying unconstitutional religious bias against Muslims. But the rationale that the majority (Thomas concurred in part in the 7-2 decision but not with the rationale) is that the Colorada Civil Rights Commission demonstrated unconstitutional bias against the baker Jack Philips all of a sudden RBG wasn’t concerned about religious liberty. So foreign nationals with no connection to the US other than perhaps applying for a visa have first amendment rights but American citizens do not, in RBG’s world.

Leftists don’t care about displaying their hypocrisy to the world. They enjoy giving the American people the finger because they simply have the power to do so. And to the post-Modern left everything comes down to power. Judicial activists issue incoherent decisions simply because they can, they have lifetime appointments, and nobody can do anything about it.

“Sometimes, two plus two makes five. Sometimes it makes three. Sometimes it makes all numbers. You must try harder, Winston. It is not easy to become sane.”

– George Orwell, 1984

One of my daughters is also an FBI agent/lawyer. I warned her, early on, that the FBI has often been used by politicians, but she seems largely apolitical. I’m sure she’s conflicted, but we don’t talk politics. She’s assigned to some pretty dangerous street duty, so I leave her alone. Seeing the underside tends to make people conservative.

The oldest is married to a REALLY left wing Psychology professor who is busy messing up their kids. I think he is having some second thoughts.

Two daughters, I don’t talk politics with but one of them senses that she might not be as smart as she thought. A couple of years ago she announced that “I want to make some money.”

The other is an FBI agent/lawyer and has some conflicts.

below:
The Technique of a Coup d’Etat
http://www.idc-europe.org/en/The-Technique-of-a-Coup-d-Etat

2a. Willi Münzenberg

One of the modern masters of such media control was the German Communist from whom Joseph Goebbels learned his trade, Willi Münzenberg.

Münzenberg was not only the inventor of spin, he was also the first person who perfected the art of creating a network of opinion-forming journalists who propagated views which were germane to the needs of the Communist Party in Germany and to the Soviet Union.

oh, so everything you see and the process you see with the news and all that is just a constant extension of willis program, unblocked cause no one remembers willi, they only refer to goebels…

but the student is not the master, are they?

But why learn who the masters are?
thats not very entertaining…

WHY DONT YOU KNOW THE MAN WHO MOLDED YOUR THOUGHTS?

He also made a huge fortune in the process, since he amassed a considerable media empire from which he creamed off the profits.

Münzenberg was intimately involved with the Communist project from the very beginning. He belonged to Lenin’s circle in Zurich, and in 1917 accompanied the future leader of the Bolshevik revolution to the Zurich Hauptbahnhof, from whence Lenin was transported in a sealed train, and with the help of the German imperial authorities, to the Finland Station in St. Petersburg.

The Latvian Rifle men held the country for the above to happen adn later were betrayed for it by stalin… why learn the history of other countries? because you might learn what happened to them happens to YOU…

Lenin then called on Münzenberg to combat the appalling publicity generated in 1921 when 25 million peasants in the Volga region started to suffer from the famine which swept across the newly created Soviet state.

Münzenberg, who had by then returned to Berlin, where he was later elected to the Reichstag as a Communist deputy, was charged with setting up a bogus workers’ charity, the Foreign Committee for the Organisation of Worker Relief for the Hungry in Soviet Russia, whose purpose was to pretend to the world that humanitarian relief was coming from sources other than Herbert Hoover’s American Relief Administration.

want to bet that many of the organizations you will read about when reading his history, do not have any attribution to him on wikipedia? he is a ghost…

put the whole name in, you get few links and know willi
take out foreign, and you get all the media of how the US saved russia from starvation.

How the U.S. saved a starving Soviet Russia: PBS film highlights Stanford scholar’s research on the 1921-23 famine

Nothing prepared the ARA team for what they found in the largest nation in the world, Soviet Russia. The communist state had a transportation system in chaos, a hostile climate, a mistrustful Bolshevik government that spied on the U.S. relief workers and the horrifying magnitude of a catastrophic famine that threatened 16 million with starvation at its height in the winter of 1921.

The famine, exacerbated by government mass requisitioning of grain in the previous years, was killing about 100,000 people a week. Soviet estimates from the 1920s claim 5 million died in the famine, although other estimates range up to 10 million.
https://news.stanford.edu/pr/2011/pr-famine-040411.html

Lenin feared not only that Hoover would use his humanitarian aid project to send spies into the USSR (which he did) but also, perhaps even more importantly, that the world’s first Communist state would be fatally damaged by the negative publicity of seeing capitalist America come to its aid within a few years of the revolution.

After having cut his teeth on “selling” the death of millions of people at the hands of the Bolsheviks, Münzenberg turned his attention to more general propaganda activities.

He amassed a large media empire, known as “the Münzenberg trust”, which owned two mass circulation dailies in Germany, a mass circulation weekly, and which had interests in scores of other publications around the world.

His greatest coups were to mobilise world opinion against America over the Sacco-Vanzetti trial (that of two anarchist Italian immigrants who were sentenced to death for murder in Massachusetts in 1921) and to counteract the Nazis’ claim in 1933 that the Reichstag fire was the result of a Communist conspiracy.

which facts do YOU think you know?

The Nazis, it will be remembered, used the fire to justify mass arrests and executions against Communists, even though it now appears that the fire genuinely was started on his own by the man arrested in the building at the time, the lone arsonist Martinus van der Lubbe.

Münzenberg actually managed to convince large sections of public opinion of the equal but opposite untruth to that peddled by the Nazis, namely that the Nazis had started the fire themselves in order to have a pretext for removing their main enemies.

so good, you attribute all he did and taught to other people and dont even know half of what he did… (or evne worse what his succcessor did that you discuss today, almost every day!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

The key relevance of Münzenberg for our own day is this: he understood the key importance of influencing opinion-formers.

He targeted especially intellectuals, taking the view that intellectuals were especially easy to influence because they were so vain.

His contacts included many of the great literary figures of the 1930s, a large number of whom were encouraged by him to support the Republicans in the Spanish civil war and to make that into a cause-célèbre of Communist anti-fascism.

Münzenberg’s tactics are of primary importance to the manipulation of opinion in today’s New World Order. More then ever before, so-called ‘experts’ constantly pop up on our TV screens to explain what is happening, and they are always vehicles for the official party line. They are controlled in various ways, usually by money or by flattery.

Social democracy is a political, social and economic ideology that supports economic and social interventions to promote social justice within the framework of a liberal democratic polity and capitalist economy. The protocols and norms used to accomplish this involve a commitment to representative and participatory democracy; measures for income redistribution and regulation of the economy in the general interest; and welfare state provisions.

Social democracy originated as a political ideology that advocated an evolutionary and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism using established political processes in contrast to the revolutionary approach to transition associated with orthodox Marxism.

In this period, social democrats embraced a mixed economy based on the predominance of private property, with only a minority of essential utilities and public services under public ownership. As a result, social democracy became associated with Keynesian economics, state interventionism and the welfare state, while abandoning the prior goal of replacing the capitalist system (factor markets, private property and wage labor) with a qualitatively different socialist economic system.

they believe they are and have the people behind the social transition from capitalism to communism and every time someone backs that up, it must be the classic fascists (like germany or more like bukharin) in wanting more economy and less direct control (preferring to use licensing, inspections, dikta of how to do business, etc. (sound familiar, it should)).

so… they leave the word social out…

by doing so, they paint exit on the entrancesigns and entrance on the exit signs and their charges work harder taking the place apart thinking they are making it stronger

I have been explainging the process states use (from the 150-200 years of political papers no one reads but them!!) to do this for a decade..

quite boring we never get past it trying to understand the processes…
cant throw a wrench in a process you dont understand and chatting while everyone gets old and dies out is kind of a waste of good time even if its miserably entertaining for some

I can just imagine the exchange:

Dem to Rep: You’re evil!

Rep, in retort: Yeah, OK, but we’re also stupid! What’s your excuse?

Republicans think Democrats are stupid but Democrats think Republicans are evil?

Democrats do NOT think Republicans are evil. Democrats propagandize that Republicans are stupid and evil.

I believe that Democrats are SMART and EVIL.

A funny article on the place of conservatives and liberals (as those terms are used today) in history can be found here:
http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2016/tle855-20160117-04.html

I believe history is repeating itself. The French Resistance was idolized by US writers though it was far less than representative of French feelings, and really yielded precious little anti-Nazi effect.

We are seeing history repeating itself as farce.

The Resistance, my ass. They are babykillers (see Jason Riley’s WSJ piece today for the black abortion data) and favor all forms of sexual perversion. They will find no sanctuary in my church.