Yet even if “we” only means “we, the good people of this nation” it is still a terrible thing.

What’s completely out of line here is the excessive communication on company time and equipment; particularly by employees whose jobs offer them the power to take life-altering actions against other people because of those opinions; most particularly by people whose paychecks and company equipment are being paid for by all taxpaying citizens. We are paying for these people to spend work time insulting us, and plotting against the elected officials we elected, and we are paying for the computers, servers and mobile devices they are using to communicate these vitriolic and hateful private opinions and plot what are, essentially, extralegal if not actually treasonous actions.

My company would haul me before HR, if not fire me outright, for using company time and equipment in this way, and in my job, I have nothing to do with legal investigations which I can either squash or invent from nothing depending on whether or not I like the politics of the target of the investigation.

To defend the activity described – even if it is not technically “illegal” – is simply not possible in a lawful nation.

Welcome to the age of un-accountability. When you engage in government corruption, a very long, embarrassing report will be written about you, then you can go along on your merry way, claiming your innocence.

To be fair, that’s not an accurate assessment.

Some, not liking what they’ve been seeing (and/or smelling) already have switched.

More will follow.

The question is, of course, how many?

Indeed, there are many who will simply NOT see it (and the MSM is certainly doing its very best, spinning furiously 24/7, to ensure that any “untoward” news does NOT get out).

But others—how many, though?—are thoroughly sick of what they never were able to see (or never wanted to see) between 2009 and 2016.

Once again, the question is, just how many?….

I admire your optimism.

Now the IG describes detailed instances of anti-Trump bias and actions threatened to destroy his candidacy and later, his Presidency. However, the IG could find no “hard evidence” of political bias, just “bad judgement.” The intent is that the bad boys/girls in the FBI will be free as birds also.

Hoo boy, maybe the MSM can sell this narrative to the progs, but I’m betting that the mid terms are going to be less than a blue tide. If you’re not hot to vote for Trump supporters in the mid-terms, you don’t understand the issues. The only solution to this corruption is to provide such majorities to the GOP that they really can clean up the swamp.

When you can conclude racial bias by the percentages of minorities hired, gender discrimination by the relative wages ignoring difference in choices, or any other of the favorite liberal bias tropes, you an conclude bias by the party donations and the favors sought by these people.

Gosh, if one can’t(!) call Strzok “biased” can one at least call him “amazingly incompetent”?

(Moreover, he lied to his lover. Really let her down. Does the FBI ever fire anyone for that level of incompetence? Or for lying so insensitively to one’s amorous co-conspirator?)

And who is this mysterious “we” being referred to?

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/14/blast-thread-on-oig-report-briefings-and-releases-chaff-and-countermeasures/#more-150572