If you can set aside your dogma, maybe you won’t go back into the conspiracy theory argument, GB.

When you constantly talk about how I am worried about being right or wrong, I suspect this is merely a projection to defend your own dogma and doctrines from being challenged. You can’t objectively argue them, so you can’t defend them using reason or arguments. But you can transfer the ego issue over to other people.

That’s so far below your baseline of reasonable argument that it doesn’t take an expert textual analyst to see it.

Ultimately you underestimate the Leftist alliance, the Deep State, and the Islamic Jihad because you believe you have a god on your side powerful enough to Create and thus End these threats. So you aren’t worried. If you were to ever objectively even think that you might have been wrong on the dogma, it all comes crashing down. That’s why you react using projection in talking about other people’s egos. My ego is not in danger here, no matter if I am right or wrong. Your identity is in very much of a danger if your god is not as strong as you thought.

After all, they did the same trick propping up McCain as a Maverick and Hussein won over their selection of the Republican candidate. How can a woman fail to do what a black man did.

My own first thought, my first instinctive reaction, was that she and her lawyers and staff were huddled looking for some way to overturn the result.

Paranoid? Maybe. But that was my first reaction, and I still rather suspect it was the truth. Hillary longs for power, I think, at a level beyond even the usual run of politicians.

Over the next few days, the story surfaced that she didn’t speak because she couldn’t, she was too angry and hysterical and tearful to face the cameras. That too sounded plausible for what we’ve heard of Hillary behind-the-scenes, but I still lean toward the first one.

Good to know you have a nice objective perspective there.

The long-suffering feminist heroine would make history not in a festooned lovefest but in a dreary, mechanical slog.

By late fall, the traveling press – called “the Girls on the Bus” since on any given day, of our cohort of about 20 regular reporters, as many as 18 of us were women – were calling it Hillary’s Death March to Victory.

If I had to identify a single unifying force behind Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, it was her obvious desire to get the whole thing over with.

I think this does touch on something very fundamental about Hillary. I thought it back in the 90s, and everything since has only reinforced my opinion on this: Hillary Clinton hates politics.

This is, she hates ‘retail politics’, the actual, practical process of appealing to voters for their vote, of reaching out to voters whom I suspect she holds in considerable contempt.

(I think the same of Al Gore. But not Bill. He loves it. I think Obama is indifferent to it, he doesn’t enjoy it but he doesn’t hate it.)

To Hillary, actually campaigning is, I suspect, something close to torment, or at best an endurance contest. I believe that she actively dislikes most people, esp. people she considers her social and intellectual inferiors, and probably that she’s one of those people who ‘love humanity but can’t stand humans’.

I could be wrong. I’ve never met her. But that is my firm impression after watching her in action for over 25 years.

Well it’s all relative because the elite are ruled by the Illuminati, who are in turn ruled by the space aliens… right? Oops my mistake, not space aliens, it’s the “Prince of Darkness”, right?

If you can set aside your ego, you might consider that history demonstrates that the elite “rule” at the sufferance of the majority. History is filled with examples. The ice upon which they stand is far thinner than you apparently credit.

It’s really extraordinary – was there not one old-time Democratic ward-heeler or union guy around her? Not one?

Very probably not. That’s one of the key things to understand about today’s politics, and today’s Democratic Party. The Dems are divided into separate wing and factions just like the GOP, and Hillary is very nearly the embodiment of the currently-dominant ‘elite white liberal’ wing.

They’re college-educated, many of the older ones are old hippies or the like, they tend to focus primarily on _social_ issues. Racism, feminism, genderism, gay agenda, whatever. When people say that the Democrats hate America, this is the group that they’re mostly thinking about.

They don’t like working class white America, they like unions as a source of money but tend to despise their rank-and-file membership, often even the public-sector ones. They tend to be ferociously hostile to Christianity and they are the ones going on about ‘toxic masculinity’ and the like.

So it’s hardly surprising that Hillary didn’t have much input from the people who were linked to the white working class vote. I suspect she didn’t even like thinking about them. She’s culturally alienated from them.

Bill Clinton, whatever his faults, is politically astute, and he probably had some idea of the score. But I don’t think Hillary likes listening to Bill, either.

In her heart of hearts, I think she had this in common with McCain: that she wanted to win, but to win _her way_. Her preferred road to victory was feminism, ‘vote for me so I can be the first woman President’. McCain wanted to win with ‘vote for me because I’m a war hero and can work with Democrats’, and his heart wasn’t in anything else.

Hillary tried ‘vote for me because I’m a woman’ in 2008, and the result was a loss to Obama in the primaries. She came close to catching up to him after Super Tuesday by switching over and appealing to the traditional white working class Dems, but I think she hated every minute of it.

In 2016, she went back to ‘vote for me because I’m a woman’, because that’s where her heart is. She wanted to ‘win with feminism’.

If you believe that, AND you believe that you’re on the side of Justice, then you have to believe that you’re on the side of “History”.

You can’t possibly be wrong. Therefore, you have to believe that you’re destined to win. So, if you don’t win, then it can only be because somebody, somewhere, is cheating you out of your rightful victory.

They are about as effective or incorruptible as the FBI/IRS audits, and the audits of Madoff and Enron pyramid schemes.

I am sure you Americans can put your trust in these independent audit bodies, right.

While Audits are to detect embezzlement, when a foreign body controls how much your currency is issued GB, did you ever realize they don’t need to embezzle money. They have more power than Soros did over breaking the British currency markets.

So, those involved in the Federal Reserve’s operations are prohibited from directly profiting from their insider status.

That doesn’t mean anything. The decisions of the Federal Reserve are made without respect to Congress or the President. You have no leverage or power over them. They Rule you, not the other way around.

It is also why the banks are “too big to fail”. Not because of Cruz and his wife working for Gold Man Sachs, btw. But because the DS are the ones propping up and controlling the US currency itself. Congress cannot rule the nation without a stable currency. None of your elected officials determine what happens to the US fiat currency. They could print you into another Weimar Republic great depression, and you would have no say on it.

During the Great Depression, more millionaires were produced than at any other time in the USA, all added up together. You might want to think about looking into how the truly wise rich make their wealth. It’s not in the stock market or through “profit” on bank loans.

You have been given more than enough hints. Still can’t figure it out? And yet Americans think they can “win”, right.