when men win, their testosterone goes up
when they lose, it goes down
its a survival thing
you dont want to be put down and keep fighting till your dead
so the alpha gets more testosterone, and the betas become less

and testosterone is a major thing in fertility
they always put it last after other things, but the numbers dont lie
and nothing but one thing explains all the different items
they refuse that answer, and so they do everything else BUT
they try fertility, freezing, state aid, importing people, making the men take leave, etc.

turns out that making men pick up the womens work makes men into beta males… women dominating makes a society of beta males… beta males smoke more, drink more, sit on the couch more and compete less… the other items on the fertility list..

this has been discussed a lot before, but not anywhere women can hear ya and shut down the conversation, and so on.. or even like with Watson, kick the guys out, so as to hide this effect, the early onset of menses effect, the women baldness effect (that’s gone up a lot too – but when women act masculine THEIR testosterone goes up, becomes another chemical and THAT makes them bald – just like men – along with weight gain… this they spent a lot of money to study why lesbians tend to be fat)… they become meaner too more aggressive.. and lets just say: Mercurial

remember for the men, from radio, to theater, to tv and magainzes and news, there is a constant men are bad, speech going on in which the goal is to make BETA MALES… ie. more like women, more equal… we are dimorphic for a reason, and our survival depended on it, do you think nature didnt build things into the system to help preserve that and keep it down until needed?

pajama boy are beta males, as well as metrosexuals, etc.. all beta models of men
toxic masculinity is the declawing of men into beta males. and funny funny, you do that, you lose, your side loses the stronge fitter side that doesn do that wins…

there is a lot more science you can look up and read on this, you just wont ever hear of it any more than you hear that perimenopause starts early and that even russia knew the link between later births and babies having more mental issues (like we have more mental issues in our society with shooters and others, no?)… the more women who have later babies the more poor mental health outcomes across the population…

Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition.
Booth A1, Shelley G, Mazur A, Tharp G, Kittok R.
Author information
Abstract

Testosterone and cortisol were measured in six university tennis players across six matches during their varsity season. Testosterone rose just before most matches, and players with the highest prematch testosterone had the most positive improvement in mood before their matches. After matches, mean testosterone rose for winners relative to losers, especially for winners with very positive moods after their victories and who evaluated their own performance highly. Winners with rising testosterone had higher testosterone before their next match, in contrast to losers with falling testosterone, who had lower testosterone before their next match. Cortisol was not related to winning or losing, but it was related to seed (top players having low cortisol), and cortisol generally declined as the season progressed.

These results are consistent with a biosocial theory of status.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
how do you prevent counter revolution?
domesticate the men to beta males so no one wants to
the revolt of the docile neer happens

but this is what nature has created to prevent long term slavery
some animals dont breed well in captivity

sperm counts drop when men lose… ie. become beta
this includes home, work, etc… you put your men down, your men have fewer kids
the men who are winners have more.. the group survives better
it doesnt matter if he loses to his wife, his girlfriend, affirmative action, the man, etc.

just as early onset menses start when birth father is gone…
these go back to our primate days…
they ARE known, but who would dare say anything
remember what happened to Watson of DNA fame?
artfldgr

Men’s Sperm Counts Are Dropping, and Scientists Don’t Know Why
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/men-apos-sperm-counts-dropping-074720787.html

The topic of overpopulation has been much discussed over the past few decades, but what if the real issue is a severe decline in population?

It sounds like something straight out of a dystopian nightmare, but new research shows sperm counts are drastically dropping across the Western world.

Researchers from Hebrew University-Hadassah Braun School of Public Health and Community Medicine in Jerusalem announced this week that sperm count in men residing in developed countries has dropped by a whopping 50 percent over the past 40 years. They claim this alarming trend could potentially result in a decline in male health, fertility and possibly even extinction if the trend doesn’t turn around.

“This study is an urgent wake-up call for researchers and health authorities around the world to investigate the causes of the sharp ongoing drop in sperm count,” explained study co-author Hagai Levine.

After data was collected from 185 studies looking at sperm count and concentration in men from North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand from 1973 to 2011, researchers found that total sperm count declined by 59.3 percent and sperm concentration declined by 52.4 percent.

Data from men in South America, Asia and Africa were also examined, however, no serious decline was detected. Researchers did note that not as many studies have been conducted in these regions.

Researchers didn’t look into reasons why the drop in sperm count occurred, but noted that the phenomenon has been previously linked to factors ranging from exposure to chemicals and pesticides to lifestyle choices, including smoking, obesity and stress. They are worried that if things keep heading in this direction, the human race could be doomed.

Daniel Brison, an embryology and stem cell biology specialist at Manchester University who was asked to comment on the findings, told Reuters the study had “major implications not just for fertility, but for male health and wider public health.”

“An unanswered question is whether the impact of whatever is causing declining sperm counts will be seen in future generations of children via epigenetic (gene modifications) or other mechanisms operating in sperm,” Brison said.

The next step is obviously to pinpoint what is causing the sperm count to decrease so dramatically. “Given that we still do not know what lifestyle, dietary or chemical exposures might have caused this decrease, research efforts to identify (them) need to be redoubled and to be nonpresumptive as to cause,” added Edinburgh University’s Richard Sharpe.

In the meantime, if you are concerned about your own declining sperm count you should consider modifying your diet. Here are some foods that can help make your sperm more active, healthy and abundant.

What to do, when TPTB decide that was a mistake? When they see that they NEED military might, along with their economic club, to complete their Globalist plan? And how do they get their “voluntary member countries” to accept such a thing, while memories of two terrible World Wars still remain vivid to the citizens of those member countries?

Maybe-just-maybe they try to engineer “a little something” that will cause those citizens, those countries, to BEG their economic masters to PLEASE DO SOMETHING TO MAKE US SAFE
IN OUR OWN HOMES, IN OUR OWN COUNTRIES.

The Commies and the Nazis and the Chinese –and the Globalist Economic Bureaucrats– all take a “long view of history”, and they all want to set themselves up for a Thousand-Year-Reich (or whatever name they eventually give their Glorious Plan).

But was it a mistake in other respects? That is, what did she actually intend to occur after admitting all the migrants? It wasn’t a mistake if the current conditions are what she wanted.

I couldn’t understand why Merkel et al. continued to persevere long after it became obvious the refugees were mostly young Muslim males with little interest in assimilation, Europe’s capacity for assimilating such males was being exhausted and the refugees were often violent, criminal and terrorist.

I get that virtue-signaling is fun and profitable in the short-term, but it strikes me as blind, arrogant hubris to go as far with it as they have.

Sorta like when the French Revolution and the American Colonial Revolution started around the same time period.

If Europe falls, they can use their warheads against the US or whomever. If the US falls and becomes the Islamic States of America, the warheads will be headed in the other direction.

The Spanish civil war preceded WW2. Civil wars tend to precede a lot of global conflicts.

Peter Singer says the obligation falls to those of us that have the means to care for the less fortunate – we can so we must. Marx phrased it differently but the idea is the same. Merkel, et al, seem to follow this rule. However, my non-expert understanding of Singer’s position indicates that his rule applies so long as the obliged person does no harm to himself by helping the less fortunate, i.e.; you are not obligated to impoverish yourself by helping the poor and impoverished.

Given that the influx of refugees has resulted in serious harm to German society the actions of Essen and others are justified. Merkel’s insistence to the contrary amounts to moral preening.

However, I think this just applies to a different branch.

Source

http://www.dw.com/en/families-and-kids-first-german-food-bank-tafel-says/a-42790324