Comments on: American teens are delaying sex more

By: Ymar Sakar

Ymar Sakar — Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:03:20 +0000

Humans are easy to enslave via orgies. Just look at them.

By: neo-neocon

neo-neocon — Mon, 08 Jan 2018 17:28:20 +0000

Julia:

Good question. I’m not at all sure how they defined sex.

By: Julia

Julia — Mon, 08 Jan 2018 13:30:26 +0000

By sex, do they mean just genital intercourse? Perhaps the youth are still sexually active, but are focused more on oral as opposed to genital.

Why they’d suggest sex ed is the cause is beyond me. It doesn’t meet the standards for ’cause’.

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Mon, 08 Jan 2018 03:07:03 +0000

n.n Says:
January 7th, 2018 at 4:26 pm
Sexual education because biology and morality are hard.
* * *
Indeed.

By: n.n

n.n — Sun, 07 Jan 2018 21:26:14 +0000

Sexual education because biology and morality are hard.

By: William Graves

William Graves — Sun, 07 Jan 2018 18:09:17 +0000

If the function of studies is to engender additional studies, this one will be a great success.

Now STAR testing in California measures the percentage of students at the ‘proficient’ or ‘advanced’ level in multiple subjects at between 44% and 59%. Given that the schools aren’t exactly doing a bang-up job at their basic mission, why are we allowing mission creep to force them into peripheral teaching assignments which they are ill equipped to succeed in? Would that be insufficient opportunity for political indoctrination? Or perhaps insufficient opportunity for graft?

By: AesopFan

AesopFan — Sun, 07 Jan 2018 00:28:37 +0000

I recall to this day, some 40 years plus after reading it, an interview with a HS principle objecting to adding “sex education” to the curriculum, on the grounds that the students already knew far too much about sex.